食管腺癌术前治疗反应的简单形态学分析。

Madhurya Ramineni, Rena X Li, Xiaoyan Liao, Yansheng Hao
{"title":"食管腺癌术前治疗反应的简单形态学分析。","authors":"Madhurya Ramineni, Rena X Li, Xiaoyan Liao, Yansheng Hao","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0167-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Histologic assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) on esophagogastrectomy specimens after neoadjuvant therapy is an excellent predictor of local recurrence rate and long-term survival in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Although several grading systems exist globally, the modified Ryan system suggested by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) is widely used in North America. Most systems rely on quantitative percentage estimation of the residual tumor with or without additional qualitative descriptors, which is relatively subjective with poor interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To test a morphometric-based approach using the microscopic objective lens to estimate the size of the largest focus of the residual tumor.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A total of 69 esophageal specimens post neoadjuvant therapy were evaluated. Tumor size was morphometrically determined by the microscopic field, using an Olympus microscope with ×10/×22 eyepieces. Residual viable tumor was categorized into 4 groups, using ×2, ×4, and ×10 objectives: less than or equal to an ×10 field; larger than an ×10 field but less than or equal to an ×4 field; larger than an ×4 field but less than an ×2 field; and larger than or equal to an ×2 field.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Morphometric measurements significantly correlated with the CAP treatment effect scores. There was no significant difference in overall survival between larger than or equal to ×2 and ×2 to ×4 groups; however, a 3-tier system (TRG1: ≤ ×10, TRG2: > ×10 and ≤ ×4, and TRG3: > ×4) showed significant survival differences (P = .01). Significant differences in the percentage of lymphovascular and perineural invasion, advanced TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis were identified among the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The proposed 3-tier morphometric approach based on microscopic field size is a simple and easy-to-use method, which helps stratify patients into 3 groups with distinct histopathologic features and overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simple Morphometric Analysis of Preoperative Therapy Response for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Madhurya Ramineni, Rena X Li, Xiaoyan Liao, Yansheng Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2024-0167-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Histologic assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) on esophagogastrectomy specimens after neoadjuvant therapy is an excellent predictor of local recurrence rate and long-term survival in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Although several grading systems exist globally, the modified Ryan system suggested by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) is widely used in North America. Most systems rely on quantitative percentage estimation of the residual tumor with or without additional qualitative descriptors, which is relatively subjective with poor interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To test a morphometric-based approach using the microscopic objective lens to estimate the size of the largest focus of the residual tumor.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A total of 69 esophageal specimens post neoadjuvant therapy were evaluated. Tumor size was morphometrically determined by the microscopic field, using an Olympus microscope with ×10/×22 eyepieces. Residual viable tumor was categorized into 4 groups, using ×2, ×4, and ×10 objectives: less than or equal to an ×10 field; larger than an ×10 field but less than or equal to an ×4 field; larger than an ×4 field but less than an ×2 field; and larger than or equal to an ×2 field.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Morphometric measurements significantly correlated with the CAP treatment effect scores. There was no significant difference in overall survival between larger than or equal to ×2 and ×2 to ×4 groups; however, a 3-tier system (TRG1: ≤ ×10, TRG2: > ×10 and ≤ ×4, and TRG3: > ×4) showed significant survival differences (P = .01). Significant differences in the percentage of lymphovascular and perineural invasion, advanced TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis were identified among the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The proposed 3-tier morphometric approach based on microscopic field size is a simple and easy-to-use method, which helps stratify patients into 3 groups with distinct histopathologic features and overall survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0167-OA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0167-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上下文。-:食管胃切除术标本新辅助治疗后肿瘤消退等级(TRG)的组织学评估是食管腺癌局部复发率和长期生存率的良好预测指标。虽然全球存在多种分级制度,但北美地区广泛采用的是美国病理学家学会(CAP)提出的改良Ryan分级制度。大多数系统依赖于残留肿瘤的定量百分比估计,有或没有额外的定性描述符,这是相对主观的,观察者之间的一致性很差。-:测试一种基于形态计量学的方法,使用显微物镜来估计残余肿瘤的最大焦点的大小。-:对新辅助治疗后的69例食管标本进行评估。使用Olympus显微镜和×10/×22目镜,通过显微镜视野形态测定肿瘤大小。剩余活肿瘤分为4组,使用×2, ×4和×10目标值:小于或等于×10;大于×10字段但小于或等于×4字段的;大于×4字段但小于×2字段;并且大于或等于×2字段。-:形态计量学测量值与CAP治疗效果评分显著相关。大于等于×2组和×2 ~ ×4组的总生存率无显著差异;而三层系统(TRG1:≤×10, TRG2: > ×10和≤×4, TRG3: > ×4)的生存差异有统计学意义(P = 0.01)。三组患者淋巴血管及神经周围浸润率、TNM晚期分期及淋巴结转移率差异均有统计学意义。-:提出的基于显微视野大小的3层形态测量法是一种简单易行的方法,可以根据不同的组织病理特征和总生存期将患者分为3组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Simple Morphometric Analysis of Preoperative Therapy Response for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Context.—: Histologic assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) on esophagogastrectomy specimens after neoadjuvant therapy is an excellent predictor of local recurrence rate and long-term survival in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Although several grading systems exist globally, the modified Ryan system suggested by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) is widely used in North America. Most systems rely on quantitative percentage estimation of the residual tumor with or without additional qualitative descriptors, which is relatively subjective with poor interobserver agreement.

Objective.—: To test a morphometric-based approach using the microscopic objective lens to estimate the size of the largest focus of the residual tumor.

Design.—: A total of 69 esophageal specimens post neoadjuvant therapy were evaluated. Tumor size was morphometrically determined by the microscopic field, using an Olympus microscope with ×10/×22 eyepieces. Residual viable tumor was categorized into 4 groups, using ×2, ×4, and ×10 objectives: less than or equal to an ×10 field; larger than an ×10 field but less than or equal to an ×4 field; larger than an ×4 field but less than an ×2 field; and larger than or equal to an ×2 field.

Results.—: Morphometric measurements significantly correlated with the CAP treatment effect scores. There was no significant difference in overall survival between larger than or equal to ×2 and ×2 to ×4 groups; however, a 3-tier system (TRG1: ≤ ×10, TRG2: > ×10 and ≤ ×4, and TRG3: > ×4) showed significant survival differences (P = .01). Significant differences in the percentage of lymphovascular and perineural invasion, advanced TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis were identified among the 3 groups.

Conclusions.—: The proposed 3-tier morphometric approach based on microscopic field size is a simple and easy-to-use method, which helps stratify patients into 3 groups with distinct histopathologic features and overall survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative Evaluation of Pediatric Bone and Soft Tissue Lesions: Retrospective Analysis of 595 Frozen Sections With Emphasis on Discrepancy and Diagnostic Pitfalls. The Impact of Scoring Method on Accuracy and Reproducibility of Hans Cell-of-Origin Prediction in Excisional Biopsies of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified. The Pathologic Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Development of a Scoring Rubric Assessing Medical Students' Explanations of Pathology Reports. Localized Urinary Bladder Amyloidosis as Urothelial Cancer Mimicker: A Case Series Examining Cystoscopic, Histologic, and Cytologic Findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1