2型糖尿病患者中SGLT2抑制剂与DPP4抑制剂相关的肾结石风险:一项目标试验模拟研究

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1652
Anna Shin, Ju-Young Shin, Eun Ha Kang
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者中SGLT2抑制剂与DPP4抑制剂相关的肾结石风险:一项目标试验模拟研究","authors":"Anna Shin, Ju-Young Shin, Eun Ha Kang","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE We aim to compare the risk of nephrolithiasis among type 2 diabetes patients who initiated sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), individually within stone never- and ever-formers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using the 2010–2021 Korea National Health Insurance Service database, we conducted a population-based cohort study, comparing initiators of SGLT2is versus DPP4is. The primary outcome was incident nephrolithiasis. Osteoarthritis encounters served as a negative control outcome. After 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching in stone never- and ever-formers, pooled and individual hazard ratios (HRs), incidence rate difference (IRD), and 95% CIs were reported. Subgroup analyses by sex, age, thiazide co-use, and baseline cardiovascular risk were done. RESULTS The 17,006 PS-matched pairs of SGLT2i and DPP4i initiators were pooled from stone never- (105,378 pairs) and ever-formers (11,628 pairs). Over a mean of 654 days, the risk of nephrolithiasis was lower in SGLT2i initiators than in DPP4i: 0.65 vs. 1.12 events per 100 person-years, HR 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50–0.57), IRD −0.46 (95% CI,−0.21 to −0.52). Among never-formers, the HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.39–0.48) and IRD was −0.32 (95% CI,−0.27 to −0.36). Among ever-formers, the HR was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.59–0.69) and IRD was −2.26 (95% CI,−1.77 to −2.76). Near-null associations were found for osteoarthritis encounters. Results were consistent across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS We found a lower risk of nephrolithiasis associated with SGLT2is versus DPP4is in stone never- and ever-formers. Despite a greater relative risk reduction in the former, the absolute risk reduction was greater in the latter.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Nephrolithiasis Associated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Target Trial Emulation Study\",\"authors\":\"Anna Shin, Ju-Young Shin, Eun Ha Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/dc24-1652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE We aim to compare the risk of nephrolithiasis among type 2 diabetes patients who initiated sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), individually within stone never- and ever-formers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using the 2010–2021 Korea National Health Insurance Service database, we conducted a population-based cohort study, comparing initiators of SGLT2is versus DPP4is. The primary outcome was incident nephrolithiasis. Osteoarthritis encounters served as a negative control outcome. After 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching in stone never- and ever-formers, pooled and individual hazard ratios (HRs), incidence rate difference (IRD), and 95% CIs were reported. Subgroup analyses by sex, age, thiazide co-use, and baseline cardiovascular risk were done. RESULTS The 17,006 PS-matched pairs of SGLT2i and DPP4i initiators were pooled from stone never- (105,378 pairs) and ever-formers (11,628 pairs). Over a mean of 654 days, the risk of nephrolithiasis was lower in SGLT2i initiators than in DPP4i: 0.65 vs. 1.12 events per 100 person-years, HR 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50–0.57), IRD −0.46 (95% CI,−0.21 to −0.52). Among never-formers, the HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.39–0.48) and IRD was −0.32 (95% CI,−0.27 to −0.36). Among ever-formers, the HR was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.59–0.69) and IRD was −2.26 (95% CI,−1.77 to −2.76). Near-null associations were found for osteoarthritis encounters. Results were consistent across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS We found a lower risk of nephrolithiasis associated with SGLT2is versus DPP4is in stone never- and ever-formers. Despite a greater relative risk reduction in the former, the absolute risk reduction was greater in the latter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Care\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1652\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1652","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是比较2型糖尿病患者开始使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2is)和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4is)的肾结石风险,分别在从未和曾经形成的结石中进行。研究设计和方法使用2010-2021年韩国国民健康保险服务数据库,我们进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,比较SGLT2is和DPP4is的启动者。主要结局是偶发肾结石。遭遇骨关节炎作为阴性对照结果。在1:1倾向评分(PS)匹配从未和曾经形成的结石后,报告了合并和个体风险比(hr)、发病率差异(IRD)和95% ci。按性别、年龄、噻嗪类药物共同使用情况和基线心血管风险进行亚组分析。结果:17006对ps匹配的SGLT2i和DPP4i启动子来自无源(105378对)和无源(11628对)。在平均654天内,SGLT2i启动者肾结石的风险低于DPP4i组:0.65 vs. 1.12事件/ 100人年,HR 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50-0.57), IRD - 0.46 (95% CI, - 0.21 - - 0.52)。在未形成者中,HR为0.43 (95% CI, 0.39-0.48), IRD为- 0.32 (95% CI, - 0.27至- 0.36)。在既往患者中,HR为0.64 (95% CI, 0.59-0.69), IRD为- 2.26 (95% CI, - 1.77 - - 2.76)。与骨关节炎的相关性几乎为零。各亚组的结果一致。结论:我们发现,与从未形成和曾经形成的肾结石患者相比,SGLT2is患者发生肾结石的风险较低。尽管前者的相对风险降低幅度较大,但后者的绝对风险降低幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of Nephrolithiasis Associated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Target Trial Emulation Study
OBJECTIVE We aim to compare the risk of nephrolithiasis among type 2 diabetes patients who initiated sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), individually within stone never- and ever-formers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using the 2010–2021 Korea National Health Insurance Service database, we conducted a population-based cohort study, comparing initiators of SGLT2is versus DPP4is. The primary outcome was incident nephrolithiasis. Osteoarthritis encounters served as a negative control outcome. After 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching in stone never- and ever-formers, pooled and individual hazard ratios (HRs), incidence rate difference (IRD), and 95% CIs were reported. Subgroup analyses by sex, age, thiazide co-use, and baseline cardiovascular risk were done. RESULTS The 17,006 PS-matched pairs of SGLT2i and DPP4i initiators were pooled from stone never- (105,378 pairs) and ever-formers (11,628 pairs). Over a mean of 654 days, the risk of nephrolithiasis was lower in SGLT2i initiators than in DPP4i: 0.65 vs. 1.12 events per 100 person-years, HR 0.54 (95% CI, 0.50–0.57), IRD −0.46 (95% CI,−0.21 to −0.52). Among never-formers, the HR was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.39–0.48) and IRD was −0.32 (95% CI,−0.27 to −0.36). Among ever-formers, the HR was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.59–0.69) and IRD was −2.26 (95% CI,−1.77 to −2.76). Near-null associations were found for osteoarthritis encounters. Results were consistent across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS We found a lower risk of nephrolithiasis associated with SGLT2is versus DPP4is in stone never- and ever-formers. Despite a greater relative risk reduction in the former, the absolute risk reduction was greater in the latter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Asian Versus White Populations: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials of Populations With or Without Type 2 Diabetes and/or Overweight or Obesity Alcohol Intake, Drinking Pattern, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Three Prospective Cohorts of U.S. Women and Men Association of Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Onset, Diabetes Technology Uptake, and Clinical Outcomes After 1 and 2 Years of Follow-up: A Collaborative Analysis of Pediatric Registries Involving 9,269 Children With Type 1 Diabetes From Nine Countries Lung Function Impairment and Risks of Incident Cardiovascular Diseases and Mortality Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study The Burden of Diabetes Mortality by County, Race, and Ethnicity in the U.S., 2000–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1