认知障碍在人类疾病中的普遍性:Meta 分析的系统性回顾。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae113
David J Schretlen, John-Christopher A Finley, Victor A Del Bene, Mark Varvaris
{"title":"认知障碍在人类疾病中的普遍性:Meta 分析的系统性回顾。","authors":"David J Schretlen, John-Christopher A Finley, Victor A Del Bene, Mark Varvaris","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction occurs in many neurological, psychiatric, and other health conditions. This review aimed to characterize the breadth and degree of cognitive morbidity associated with varied health conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically reviewed Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for meta-analyses of cognitive dysfunction associated with any health condition. Meta-analyses were eligible if they reviewed studies that compared patients with health conditions to healthy controls on cognitive testing and provided effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 91 meta-analyses for 94 health conditions. Among >800,297 participants, healthy controls out-performed clinical participants in every condition on cognitive testing. Mean effect sizes ranged from -2.02 to -0.00 across conditions and were ≤ -0.5 on average, denoting moderate to very severe dysfunction for 41% of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction is ubiquitous in medicine. Both primary care and specialist physicians likely treat patients with cognitive dysfunction. Depending on its severity, cognitive dysfunction can affect treatment adherence, everyday functioning, quality of life, and the capacity to provide informed consent for treatment. These findings highlight the transdiagnostic nature of cognitive symptoms and the potential value of establishing collaborations between physicians and clinical neuropsychologists to integrate cognitive assessment into patient care. Even brief assessments can identify cognitive deficits that likely affect treatment adherence and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ubiquity of Cognitive Impairment in Human Illness: a Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"David J Schretlen, John-Christopher A Finley, Victor A Del Bene, Mark Varvaris\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acae113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction occurs in many neurological, psychiatric, and other health conditions. This review aimed to characterize the breadth and degree of cognitive morbidity associated with varied health conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically reviewed Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for meta-analyses of cognitive dysfunction associated with any health condition. Meta-analyses were eligible if they reviewed studies that compared patients with health conditions to healthy controls on cognitive testing and provided effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 91 meta-analyses for 94 health conditions. Among >800,297 participants, healthy controls out-performed clinical participants in every condition on cognitive testing. Mean effect sizes ranged from -2.02 to -0.00 across conditions and were ≤ -0.5 on average, denoting moderate to very severe dysfunction for 41% of them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction is ubiquitous in medicine. Both primary care and specialist physicians likely treat patients with cognitive dysfunction. Depending on its severity, cognitive dysfunction can affect treatment adherence, everyday functioning, quality of life, and the capacity to provide informed consent for treatment. These findings highlight the transdiagnostic nature of cognitive symptoms and the potential value of establishing collaborations between physicians and clinical neuropsychologists to integrate cognitive assessment into patient care. Even brief assessments can identify cognitive deficits that likely affect treatment adherence and functional outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:认知功能障碍发生在许多神经、精神和其他健康状况中。本综述旨在描述与不同健康状况相关的认知疾病的广度和程度。方法:我们系统地回顾了Medline、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,对与任何健康状况相关的认知功能障碍进行meta分析。如果荟萃分析回顾了在认知测试中将健康状况患者与健康对照组进行比较的研究,并提供了效应量,则荟萃分析是合格的。结果:我们发现了94种健康状况的91项荟萃分析。在bb800,297名参与者中,健康对照组在认知测试的各个条件下都优于临床参与者。不同条件下的平均效应值范围为-2.02至-0.00,平均≤-0.5,表明41%的患者存在中度至非常严重的功能障碍。结论:认知功能障碍在医学中普遍存在。初级保健和专科医生都可能治疗认知功能障碍患者。根据其严重程度,认知功能障碍可影响治疗依从性、日常功能、生活质量和提供治疗知情同意的能力。这些发现强调了认知症状的跨诊断性质,以及在医生和临床神经心理学家之间建立合作,将认知评估整合到患者护理中的潜在价值。即使是简短的评估也可以识别可能影响治疗依从性和功能结果的认知缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ubiquity of Cognitive Impairment in Human Illness: a Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.

Objective: Cognitive dysfunction occurs in many neurological, psychiatric, and other health conditions. This review aimed to characterize the breadth and degree of cognitive morbidity associated with varied health conditions.

Method: We systematically reviewed Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for meta-analyses of cognitive dysfunction associated with any health condition. Meta-analyses were eligible if they reviewed studies that compared patients with health conditions to healthy controls on cognitive testing and provided effect sizes.

Results: We found 91 meta-analyses for 94 health conditions. Among >800,297 participants, healthy controls out-performed clinical participants in every condition on cognitive testing. Mean effect sizes ranged from -2.02 to -0.00 across conditions and were ≤ -0.5 on average, denoting moderate to very severe dysfunction for 41% of them.

Conclusions: Cognitive dysfunction is ubiquitous in medicine. Both primary care and specialist physicians likely treat patients with cognitive dysfunction. Depending on its severity, cognitive dysfunction can affect treatment adherence, everyday functioning, quality of life, and the capacity to provide informed consent for treatment. These findings highlight the transdiagnostic nature of cognitive symptoms and the potential value of establishing collaborations between physicians and clinical neuropsychologists to integrate cognitive assessment into patient care. Even brief assessments can identify cognitive deficits that likely affect treatment adherence and functional outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Neurocognitive Impairment in Long COVID: A Systematic Review. Factors Influencing Objective and Subjective Prospective Memory Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury. Multidimensional ADHD Symptom Profiles: Associations with Adverse Childhood Experiences. The Utility of a Novel Neuropsychological Measurement to Analyze Event-Related Attentional Behaviors among Young Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-a Pilot Study. Correction to: Long-Term Effects of Intensive Rehabilitation on Memory Functions in Acquired Brain-Damaged Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1