在急诊科引入Broset暴力检查表:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Australasia Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14546
Biswadev Mitra MBBS, MHSM, PhD, FACEM, Kate Settle CCRN, MHA, Christine Koolstra CCRN, Carly Talarico BA, BHSc, MPH, MHA, De Villiers Smit MBChB, FACEM, Peter A Cameron MBBS, MD, FACEM
{"title":"在急诊科引入Broset暴力检查表:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Biswadev Mitra MBBS, MHSM, PhD, FACEM,&nbsp;Kate Settle CCRN, MHA,&nbsp;Christine Koolstra CCRN,&nbsp;Carly Talarico BA, BHSc, MPH, MHA,&nbsp;De Villiers Smit MBChB, FACEM,&nbsp;Peter A Cameron MBBS, MD, FACEM","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The Broset Violence Checklist (BVC) can stratify the risk of violence and aggression in EDs. The aim of the present study was to report the initial uptake of introducing this checklist and associations with unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence in two EDs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The BVC was recommended in all patient care episodes. This retrospective review included routinely collected data from an adult tertiary referral hospital and a suburban mixed paediatric and adult ED over a 12-month period. The primary outcome variable was completion of at least one BVC score and the secondary outcome was unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence episodes within the EDs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 121 330 presentations, of which 108 274 were included in the present study. The BVC was completed for 42 675 (39.4%) presentations. Using a cut-off score of 3, BVC had a specificity of 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.1–99.2) and a sensitivity of 15.6% (95% CI 12.5–19.3) for unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events. Completion of a BVC was independently associated with more unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events (adjusted odds ratio 1.37; 95% CI 1.12–1.66).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The BVC was highly specific for violence and aggression but had low sensitivity. Completion of the BVC was associated with more frequent unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events, suggesting that high-risk patients might be identified intuitively, without formal scoring. Further exploration of the utility of the BVC in the ED is indicated with a focus on strategies to prevent violence and aggression.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction of the Broset Violence Checklist in the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Biswadev Mitra MBBS, MHSM, PhD, FACEM,&nbsp;Kate Settle CCRN, MHA,&nbsp;Christine Koolstra CCRN,&nbsp;Carly Talarico BA, BHSc, MPH, MHA,&nbsp;De Villiers Smit MBChB, FACEM,&nbsp;Peter A Cameron MBBS, MD, FACEM\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.14546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Broset Violence Checklist (BVC) can stratify the risk of violence and aggression in EDs. The aim of the present study was to report the initial uptake of introducing this checklist and associations with unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence in two EDs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The BVC was recommended in all patient care episodes. This retrospective review included routinely collected data from an adult tertiary referral hospital and a suburban mixed paediatric and adult ED over a 12-month period. The primary outcome variable was completion of at least one BVC score and the secondary outcome was unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence episodes within the EDs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were 121 330 presentations, of which 108 274 were included in the present study. The BVC was completed for 42 675 (39.4%) presentations. Using a cut-off score of 3, BVC had a specificity of 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.1–99.2) and a sensitivity of 15.6% (95% CI 12.5–19.3) for unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events. Completion of a BVC was independently associated with more unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events (adjusted odds ratio 1.37; 95% CI 1.12–1.66).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The BVC was highly specific for violence and aggression but had low sensitivity. Completion of the BVC was associated with more frequent unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events, suggesting that high-risk patients might be identified intuitively, without formal scoring. Further exploration of the utility of the BVC in the ED is indicated with a focus on strategies to prevent violence and aggression.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14546\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:用Broset暴力行为检查表(BVC)对急诊科患者的暴力和攻击行为风险进行分类。本研究的目的是报告在两种急诊科中引入该清单的初步情况以及与潜在或实际暴力的意外警报的联系。方法:推荐BVC在所有患者护理期使用。本回顾性研究包括12个月期间从一家成人三级转诊医院和一家郊区儿科和成人混合急诊科例行收集的数据。主要结局变量是完成至少一个BVC评分,次要结局是对急症室中潜在或实际暴力事件的意外警报。结果:121 330例报告,其中108 274例纳入本研究。BVC完成了42 675份(39.4%)报告。使用截断分数为3分,BVC对潜在或实际暴力事件的意外警报的特异性为99.2%(95%置信区间[CI] 99.1-99.2),敏感性为15.6% (95% CI 12.5-19.3)。BVC的完成与更多潜在或实际暴力事件的意外警报独立相关(调整优势比1.37;95% ci 1.12-1.66)。结论:BVC对暴力和攻击行为具有高度特异性,但敏感性较低。BVC的完成与更频繁的潜在或实际暴力事件的意外警报有关,这表明高风险患者可能是直观地识别的,而不需要正式的评分。本文将进一步探讨BVC在英语教学中的应用,重点是预防暴力和侵略的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction of the Broset Violence Checklist in the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

The Broset Violence Checklist (BVC) can stratify the risk of violence and aggression in EDs. The aim of the present study was to report the initial uptake of introducing this checklist and associations with unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence in two EDs.

Methods

The BVC was recommended in all patient care episodes. This retrospective review included routinely collected data from an adult tertiary referral hospital and a suburban mixed paediatric and adult ED over a 12-month period. The primary outcome variable was completion of at least one BVC score and the secondary outcome was unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence episodes within the EDs.

Results

There were 121 330 presentations, of which 108 274 were included in the present study. The BVC was completed for 42 675 (39.4%) presentations. Using a cut-off score of 3, BVC had a specificity of 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.1–99.2) and a sensitivity of 15.6% (95% CI 12.5–19.3) for unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events. Completion of a BVC was independently associated with more unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events (adjusted odds ratio 1.37; 95% CI 1.12–1.66).

Conclusions

The BVC was highly specific for violence and aggression but had low sensitivity. Completion of the BVC was associated with more frequent unplanned alerts to potential or actual violence events, suggesting that high-risk patients might be identified intuitively, without formal scoring. Further exploration of the utility of the BVC in the ED is indicated with a focus on strategies to prevent violence and aggression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Mental Health Assessments and Models of Care in the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review. Correction to "Acute Suspected Stroke Clinical Pathway Use in Tasmanian Emergency Departments: A Retrospective Study". The Impact of the Geriatric Emergency Department Initiative on Older Community Dwelling Adults Presenting to the Emergency Department With a Completed Delirium Screen. Retrospective Evaluation of the STONE Score and Modified Stone Score for Prediction of Renal Tract Stones Are We Measuring What Matters? Re-Examining National Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcome Indicators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1