一种新的CBCT检测根尖周病变的人工智能模型:CBCT- sam。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105526
Ka-Kei Chau , Meilu Zhu , Abeer AlHadidi , Cheng Wang , Kuofeng Hung , Pierre Wohlgemuth , Walter Yu Hang Lam , Weicai Liu , Yixuan Yuan , Hui Chen
{"title":"一种新的CBCT检测根尖周病变的人工智能模型:CBCT- sam。","authors":"Ka-Kei Chau ,&nbsp;Meilu Zhu ,&nbsp;Abeer AlHadidi ,&nbsp;Cheng Wang ,&nbsp;Kuofeng Hung ,&nbsp;Pierre Wohlgemuth ,&nbsp;Walter Yu Hang Lam ,&nbsp;Weicai Liu ,&nbsp;Yixuan Yuan ,&nbsp;Hui Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Periapical lesions are not always evident on radiographic scans. Sometimes, asymptomatic or initial periapical lesions on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) could be missed by inexperienced dentists, especially when the scan has a large field of view and is not for endodontic treatment purposes. Previously, numerous algorithms have been introduced to assist radiographic assessment and diagnosis in the field of endodontics. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of CBCT-SAM, a new artificial intelligence (AI) model, in identifying periapical lesions on CBCT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Model training and validation in this study was performed using 185 CBCT scans with confirmed periapical lesions. Manual segmentation labels were prepared by a trained operator and validated by a maxillofacial radiologist. The diagnostic and segmentation performances of four AI models were evaluated and compared: CBCT-SAM, CBCT-SAM without progressive Prediction Refinement Module (PPR), and two previously developed models: Modified U-Net and PAL-Net. Accuracy was used to evaluated the diagnostic performance of the models, and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) were used to evaluate the models’ segmentation performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CBCT-SAM achieved an average diagnostic accuracy of 98.92% ± 010.37% and an average segmentation accuracy of 99.65% ± 0.66%. The average sensitivity, specificity, precision and DSC were 72.36 ± 21.61%, 99.87% ± 0.11%, 0.73 ± 0.21 and 0.70 ± 0.19. CBCT-SAM and PAL-Net performed significantly better than Modified U-Net in segmentation accuracy (<em>p</em> = 0.023, <em>p</em> = 0.041), sensitivity (<em>p</em> = 0.000, <em>p</em> = 0.002), and DSC (<em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.001, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.004). There is no significant difference between CBCT-SAM, CBCT-SAM without PPR and PAL-Net. However, with PPR incorporated into the model, CBCT-SAM slightly surpassed PAL-Net in the diagnostic and segmentation tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CBCT-SAM is capable of providing expert-level assistance in the identification of periapical lesions on CBCT.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>The application of artificial intelligence could increase dentists' chairside diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. By assisting radiographic assessment, such as periapical lesions on CBCT, it helps reduce the chance of missed diagnosis by human errors and facilitates early detection and treatment of dental pathologies at the early stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 105526"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel AI model for detecting periapical lesion on CBCT: CBCT-SAM\",\"authors\":\"Ka-Kei Chau ,&nbsp;Meilu Zhu ,&nbsp;Abeer AlHadidi ,&nbsp;Cheng Wang ,&nbsp;Kuofeng Hung ,&nbsp;Pierre Wohlgemuth ,&nbsp;Walter Yu Hang Lam ,&nbsp;Weicai Liu ,&nbsp;Yixuan Yuan ,&nbsp;Hui Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Periapical lesions are not always evident on radiographic scans. Sometimes, asymptomatic or initial periapical lesions on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) could be missed by inexperienced dentists, especially when the scan has a large field of view and is not for endodontic treatment purposes. Previously, numerous algorithms have been introduced to assist radiographic assessment and diagnosis in the field of endodontics. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of CBCT-SAM, a new artificial intelligence (AI) model, in identifying periapical lesions on CBCT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Model training and validation in this study was performed using 185 CBCT scans with confirmed periapical lesions. Manual segmentation labels were prepared by a trained operator and validated by a maxillofacial radiologist. The diagnostic and segmentation performances of four AI models were evaluated and compared: CBCT-SAM, CBCT-SAM without progressive Prediction Refinement Module (PPR), and two previously developed models: Modified U-Net and PAL-Net. Accuracy was used to evaluated the diagnostic performance of the models, and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) were used to evaluate the models’ segmentation performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CBCT-SAM achieved an average diagnostic accuracy of 98.92% ± 010.37% and an average segmentation accuracy of 99.65% ± 0.66%. The average sensitivity, specificity, precision and DSC were 72.36 ± 21.61%, 99.87% ± 0.11%, 0.73 ± 0.21 and 0.70 ± 0.19. CBCT-SAM and PAL-Net performed significantly better than Modified U-Net in segmentation accuracy (<em>p</em> = 0.023, <em>p</em> = 0.041), sensitivity (<em>p</em> = 0.000, <em>p</em> = 0.002), and DSC (<em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.001, <em>p</em> <em>=</em> 0.004). There is no significant difference between CBCT-SAM, CBCT-SAM without PPR and PAL-Net. However, with PPR incorporated into the model, CBCT-SAM slightly surpassed PAL-Net in the diagnostic and segmentation tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CBCT-SAM is capable of providing expert-level assistance in the identification of periapical lesions on CBCT.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>The application of artificial intelligence could increase dentists' chairside diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. By assisting radiographic assessment, such as periapical lesions on CBCT, it helps reduce the chance of missed diagnosis by human errors and facilitates early detection and treatment of dental pathologies at the early stage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030057122400695X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030057122400695X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根尖周病变在放射扫描中并不总是很明显。有时,没有经验的牙医可能会漏诊锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)上的无症状或初期根尖周病变,尤其是在扫描视野较大且并非用于牙髓治疗的情况下。在此之前,牙髓病学领域已经引入了许多算法来辅助放射评估和诊断。本研究旨在探讨 CBCT-SAM 这种新型人工智能(AI)模型在识别 CBCT 根尖周病变方面的功效:方法:本研究使用 185 张已确认根尖周病变的 CBCT 扫描图像对模型进行了训练和验证。人工分割标签由一名训练有素的操作员制作,并由一名颌面部放射科医生进行验证。对四种人工智能模型的诊断和分割性能进行了评估和比较:CBCT-SAM、CBCT-SAM(不含渐进式预测细化模块(PPR))和之前开发的两个模型:修改后的 U-Net 和 PAL-Net。准确度用于评估模型的诊断性能,准确性、灵敏度、特异性、精确度和 Dice 相似系数(DSC)用于评估模型的分割性能:CBCT-SAM 的平均诊断准确率为 98.92% ± 010.37%,平均分割准确率为 99.65% ± 0.66%。平均灵敏度、特异性、精确度和 DSC 分别为 72.36 ± 21.61%、99.87% ± 0.11%、0.73 ± 0.21 和 0.70 ± 0.19。CBCT-SAM 和 PAL-Net 在分割准确度(p= 0.023,p= 0.041)、灵敏度(p= 0.000,p= 0.002)和 DSC(p=0.001,p=0.004)方面的表现明显优于 Modified U-Net。CBCT-SAM 与 CBCT-SAM(不含 PPR)和 PAL-Net 之间没有明显差异。然而,将 PPR 纳入模型后,CBCT-SAM 在诊断和分割任务中略微超过了 PAL-Net:CBCT-SAM能够为CBCT根尖周病变的识别提供专家级的帮助:临床意义:人工智能的应用可提高牙医椅旁诊断的准确性和效率。临床意义:人工智能的应用可提高牙医椅旁诊断的准确性和效率,通过辅助 CBCT 上的根尖周病变等放射学评估,有助于减少因人为失误造成的漏诊几率,促进牙科病变的早期发现和早期治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel AI model for detecting periapical lesion on CBCT: CBCT-SAM

Objectives

Periapical lesions are not always evident on radiographic scans. Sometimes, asymptomatic or initial periapical lesions on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) could be missed by inexperienced dentists, especially when the scan has a large field of view and is not for endodontic treatment purposes. Previously, numerous algorithms have been introduced to assist radiographic assessment and diagnosis in the field of endodontics. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of CBCT-SAM, a new artificial intelligence (AI) model, in identifying periapical lesions on CBCT.

Methods

Model training and validation in this study was performed using 185 CBCT scans with confirmed periapical lesions. Manual segmentation labels were prepared by a trained operator and validated by a maxillofacial radiologist. The diagnostic and segmentation performances of four AI models were evaluated and compared: CBCT-SAM, CBCT-SAM without progressive Prediction Refinement Module (PPR), and two previously developed models: Modified U-Net and PAL-Net. Accuracy was used to evaluated the diagnostic performance of the models, and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) were used to evaluate the models’ segmentation performance.

Results

CBCT-SAM achieved an average diagnostic accuracy of 98.92% ± 010.37% and an average segmentation accuracy of 99.65% ± 0.66%. The average sensitivity, specificity, precision and DSC were 72.36 ± 21.61%, 99.87% ± 0.11%, 0.73 ± 0.21 and 0.70 ± 0.19. CBCT-SAM and PAL-Net performed significantly better than Modified U-Net in segmentation accuracy (p = 0.023, p = 0.041), sensitivity (p = 0.000, p = 0.002), and DSC (p = 0.001, p = 0.004). There is no significant difference between CBCT-SAM, CBCT-SAM without PPR and PAL-Net. However, with PPR incorporated into the model, CBCT-SAM slightly surpassed PAL-Net in the diagnostic and segmentation tasks.

Conclusions

CBCT-SAM is capable of providing expert-level assistance in the identification of periapical lesions on CBCT.

Clinical significance

The application of artificial intelligence could increase dentists' chairside diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. By assisting radiographic assessment, such as periapical lesions on CBCT, it helps reduce the chance of missed diagnosis by human errors and facilitates early detection and treatment of dental pathologies at the early stage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Effect of surface conditioning on the adhesive bond strength of 3D-printed resins used in permanent fixed dental prostheses. Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness, precision) and processing time of different 3-dimensional CAD software programs and algorithms for virtual cast alignment. 3D-Printed Clear Aligners: An Emerging Alternative to the Conventional Thermoformed Aligners? - A Systematic Review. Comparative Analysis of Salivary Cytokine Profiles and Oral Microbial Composition in Caries-Active and Caries-Free Children. The complexity of managing oral dryness in general dental care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1