胸膜浸润对病理T3-4N0M0非小细胞肺癌患者生存的影响:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的倾向评分匹配研究

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-860
Wenqiang Zhang, Ziming Wang, Luyu Huang, Lara Sarigul, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Harun Badakhshi, Zhuangshi Huang, Jens-C Rueckert, Mahmoud Ismail
{"title":"胸膜浸润对病理T3-4N0M0非小细胞肺癌患者生存的影响:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的倾向评分匹配研究","authors":"Wenqiang Zhang, Ziming Wang, Luyu Huang, Lara Sarigul, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Harun Badakhshi, Zhuangshi Huang, Jens-C Rueckert, Mahmoud Ismail","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pleural invasion (PI) is considered to be an adverse prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic roles of PI in pathologic (p)T3-4N0M0 NSCLC remain controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of PI in patients with pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study selected 9,185 patients with resected pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC from 2010 to 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. PL0 was defined as lack of PI; PL1 and PL2 as invasion of the elastic layer and of the surface of the visceral pleural invasion (VPI), respectively; and PL3 as the parietal pleura invasion (PPI). Patients were divided into six groups according to PI status and T categories. This study used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce baseline differences. The risk factors were statistically analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by T category showed worse OS in patients with PI (P<0.001). In multivariable Cox analysis of OS, patients with T3 and VPI had a significantly worse prognosis than did those with T3 but not PI (after PSM: P=0.001). There was no difference between those with T3 and VPI and those with T3 and PPI (after PSM: P=0.12) or between those with T3 PI and those with T4 but not PI (after PSM: P=0.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PI is a factor of poor prognosis in patients with pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC. Our results recommend future studies exploring the prognostic value of various T3-4 subcategories to allow PI to be separated from other T descriptors and confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"13 11","pages":"3214-3223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of pleural invasion on survival in pathologic T3-4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.\",\"authors\":\"Wenqiang Zhang, Ziming Wang, Luyu Huang, Lara Sarigul, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas, Harun Badakhshi, Zhuangshi Huang, Jens-C Rueckert, Mahmoud Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tlcr-24-860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pleural invasion (PI) is considered to be an adverse prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic roles of PI in pathologic (p)T3-4N0M0 NSCLC remain controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of PI in patients with pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study selected 9,185 patients with resected pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC from 2010 to 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. PL0 was defined as lack of PI; PL1 and PL2 as invasion of the elastic layer and of the surface of the visceral pleural invasion (VPI), respectively; and PL3 as the parietal pleura invasion (PPI). Patients were divided into six groups according to PI status and T categories. This study used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce baseline differences. The risk factors were statistically analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by T category showed worse OS in patients with PI (P<0.001). In multivariable Cox analysis of OS, patients with T3 and VPI had a significantly worse prognosis than did those with T3 but not PI (after PSM: P=0.001). There was no difference between those with T3 and VPI and those with T3 and PPI (after PSM: P=0.12) or between those with T3 PI and those with T4 but not PI (after PSM: P=0.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PI is a factor of poor prognosis in patients with pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC. Our results recommend future studies exploring the prognostic value of various T3-4 subcategories to allow PI to be separated from other T descriptors and confounders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"volume\":\"13 11\",\"pages\":\"3214-3223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632439/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-860\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸膜侵犯(PI)被认为是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一个不良预后因素。然而,PI在病理性(p)T3-4N0M0 NSCLC中的预后作用仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在评估PI在pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC患者中的预测价值。方法:本研究从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中选择2010年至2019年9,185例切除的pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC患者。PL0定义为缺乏PI;PL1和PL2分别为弹性层侵犯和内脏胸膜表面侵犯(VPI);PL3为胸膜壁层浸润(壁层浸润)。根据PI状态和T分类将患者分为6组。本研究使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来减少基线差异。采用Cox比例风险模型对危险因素进行统计学分析。采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验评估总生存期(OS)。结果:按T分类分层的Kaplan-Meier分析显示PI患者的OS较差(p)。结论:PI是pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC患者预后不良的一个因素。我们的结果建议未来研究探索各种T3-4亚类别的预后价值,以使PI与其他T描述符和混杂因素区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of pleural invasion on survival in pathologic T3-4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Background: Pleural invasion (PI) is considered to be an adverse prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic roles of PI in pathologic (p)T3-4N0M0 NSCLC remain controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of PI in patients with pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC.

Methods: This study selected 9,185 patients with resected pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC from 2010 to 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. PL0 was defined as lack of PI; PL1 and PL2 as invasion of the elastic layer and of the surface of the visceral pleural invasion (VPI), respectively; and PL3 as the parietal pleura invasion (PPI). Patients were divided into six groups according to PI status and T categories. This study used propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce baseline differences. The risk factors were statistically analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis stratified by T category showed worse OS in patients with PI (P<0.001). In multivariable Cox analysis of OS, patients with T3 and VPI had a significantly worse prognosis than did those with T3 but not PI (after PSM: P=0.001). There was no difference between those with T3 and VPI and those with T3 and PPI (after PSM: P=0.12) or between those with T3 PI and those with T4 but not PI (after PSM: P=0.30).

Conclusions: PI is a factor of poor prognosis in patients with pT3-4N0M0 NSCLC. Our results recommend future studies exploring the prognostic value of various T3-4 subcategories to allow PI to be separated from other T descriptors and confounders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
期刊最新文献
Identification and validation of pyroptosis patterns with a novel quantification system for the prediction of prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Impact of lymph node involvement in pulmonary carcinoids: a narrative review. Inhibition of miR-9-3p facilitates ferroptosis by activating SAT1/p53 pathway in lung adenocarcinoma. Long-term high fat diet aggravates the risk of lung fibrosis and lung cancer: transcriptomic analysis in the lung tissues of obese mice. Long-term survival after combination therapy with atezolizumab in a patient with small-cell lung cancer: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1