下呼吸道微生物组与肺癌患者的检查点抑制剂肺炎有关。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-853
Dongming Zhang, Junping Fan, Xiaoyan Liu, Xiaoxing Gao, Qing Zhou, Jing Zhao, Yan Xu, Wei Zhong, In-Jae Oh, Minjiang Chen, Mengzhao Wang
{"title":"下呼吸道微生物组与肺癌患者的检查点抑制剂肺炎有关。","authors":"Dongming Zhang, Junping Fan, Xiaoyan Liu, Xiaoxing Gao, Qing Zhou, Jing Zhao, Yan Xu, Wei Zhong, In-Jae Oh, Minjiang Chen, Mengzhao Wang","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gut microbiome is associated with the occurrence and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy. However, the relationship between the lower respiratory tract (LRT) microbiome and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) in lung cancer patients who underwent immunotherapy is unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between the LRT microbiome and CIP in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included lung cancer patients who received immunotherapy and had metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) results of LRT specimens [bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)]. Based on their final diagnosis, the patients were allocated to either the CIP group or the non-CIP group. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the LRT microbiome in the CIP and non-CIP patients, delineating the microbial composition, and comparing the differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 52 lung patients were included in the study, of whom 33 were allocated to the CIP group and 19 to the non-CIP group. The alpha- and beta-diversity analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups. In the CIP group, the dominant phyla were <i>Firmicutes</i> (41.7%), <i>Acinetobacter</i> (18.2%), and <i>Proteobacteria</i> (16.3%). In the non-CIP group, the dominant phyla were <i>Firmicutes</i> (38.2%), <i>Acinetobacter</i> (18.4%), and <i>Proteobacteria</i> (17.8%). Notably, the relative abundance of the <i>Proteobacteria</i> phylum (P<0.001) and <i>Firmicutes</i> phylum (P=0.01) was significantly higher in the CIP group than the non-CIP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The elevated relative abundance of the <i>Proteobacteria</i> and <i>Firmicutes</i> phyla in the LRT samples is associated with CIP in lung cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"13 11","pages":"3189-3201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower respiratory tract microbiome is associated with checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Dongming Zhang, Junping Fan, Xiaoyan Liu, Xiaoxing Gao, Qing Zhou, Jing Zhao, Yan Xu, Wei Zhong, In-Jae Oh, Minjiang Chen, Mengzhao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tlcr-24-853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gut microbiome is associated with the occurrence and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy. However, the relationship between the lower respiratory tract (LRT) microbiome and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) in lung cancer patients who underwent immunotherapy is unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between the LRT microbiome and CIP in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included lung cancer patients who received immunotherapy and had metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) results of LRT specimens [bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)]. Based on their final diagnosis, the patients were allocated to either the CIP group or the non-CIP group. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the LRT microbiome in the CIP and non-CIP patients, delineating the microbial composition, and comparing the differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 52 lung patients were included in the study, of whom 33 were allocated to the CIP group and 19 to the non-CIP group. The alpha- and beta-diversity analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups. In the CIP group, the dominant phyla were <i>Firmicutes</i> (41.7%), <i>Acinetobacter</i> (18.2%), and <i>Proteobacteria</i> (16.3%). In the non-CIP group, the dominant phyla were <i>Firmicutes</i> (38.2%), <i>Acinetobacter</i> (18.4%), and <i>Proteobacteria</i> (17.8%). Notably, the relative abundance of the <i>Proteobacteria</i> phylum (P<0.001) and <i>Firmicutes</i> phylum (P=0.01) was significantly higher in the CIP group than the non-CIP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The elevated relative abundance of the <i>Proteobacteria</i> and <i>Firmicutes</i> phyla in the LRT samples is associated with CIP in lung cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"volume\":\"13 11\",\"pages\":\"3189-3201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-853\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在接受免疫治疗的癌症患者中,肠道微生物组与免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的发生和严重程度有关。然而,在接受免疫治疗的肺癌患者中,下呼吸道(LRT)微生物组与检查点抑制剂肺炎(CIP)之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨接受免疫治疗的肺癌患者LRT微生物组与CIP之间的关系。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了接受免疫治疗且LRT标本[支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)]宏基因组新一代测序(mNGS)结果的肺癌患者。根据最终诊断结果,将患者分为CIP组和非CIP组。我们对CIP和非CIP患者的LRT微生物组进行了探索性分析,描绘了微生物组成,并比较了两组之间的差异。结果:共纳入52例肺患者,其中CIP组33例,非CIP组19例。α和β多样性分析显示两组之间没有显著差异。CIP组优势菌门为厚壁菌门(41.7%)、不动杆菌门(18.2%)和变形杆菌门(16.3%)。在非cip组中,优势门为厚壁菌门(38.2%)、不动杆菌门(18.4%)和变形杆菌门(17.8%)。值得注意的是,CIP组的变形菌门(PFirmicutes门)的相对丰度显著高于非CIP组(P=0.01)。结论:LRT样本中变形菌门和厚壁菌门的相对丰度升高与肺癌患者的CIP有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lower respiratory tract microbiome is associated with checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer patients.

Background: The gut microbiome is associated with the occurrence and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy. However, the relationship between the lower respiratory tract (LRT) microbiome and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) in lung cancer patients who underwent immunotherapy is unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between the LRT microbiome and CIP in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.

Methods: This retrospective study included lung cancer patients who received immunotherapy and had metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) results of LRT specimens [bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)]. Based on their final diagnosis, the patients were allocated to either the CIP group or the non-CIP group. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the LRT microbiome in the CIP and non-CIP patients, delineating the microbial composition, and comparing the differences between the two groups.

Results: In total, 52 lung patients were included in the study, of whom 33 were allocated to the CIP group and 19 to the non-CIP group. The alpha- and beta-diversity analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups. In the CIP group, the dominant phyla were Firmicutes (41.7%), Acinetobacter (18.2%), and Proteobacteria (16.3%). In the non-CIP group, the dominant phyla were Firmicutes (38.2%), Acinetobacter (18.4%), and Proteobacteria (17.8%). Notably, the relative abundance of the Proteobacteria phylum (P<0.001) and Firmicutes phylum (P=0.01) was significantly higher in the CIP group than the non-CIP group.

Conclusions: The elevated relative abundance of the Proteobacteria and Firmicutes phyla in the LRT samples is associated with CIP in lung cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
期刊最新文献
Identification and validation of pyroptosis patterns with a novel quantification system for the prediction of prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Impact of lymph node involvement in pulmonary carcinoids: a narrative review. Inhibition of miR-9-3p facilitates ferroptosis by activating SAT1/p53 pathway in lung adenocarcinoma. Long-term high fat diet aggravates the risk of lung fibrosis and lung cancer: transcriptomic analysis in the lung tissues of obese mice. Long-term survival after combination therapy with atezolizumab in a patient with small-cell lung cancer: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1