根治性前列腺切除术后复发性膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄的一种修复新方法:使用直肠通路。

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1177/03915603241300877
Antonio Vitarelli, Paolo Minafra, Marco Vulpi, Alberto Piana, Giuseppe Torre, Umberto Carbonara, Lucia Divenuto, Giuseppe Papapicco, Francesco Chiaradia, Stefano Alba, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Michele Battaglia, Pasquale Ditonno
{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术后复发性膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄的一种修复新方法:使用直肠通路。","authors":"Antonio Vitarelli, Paolo Minafra, Marco Vulpi, Alberto Piana, Giuseppe Torre, Umberto Carbonara, Lucia Divenuto, Giuseppe Papapicco, Francesco Chiaradia, Stefano Alba, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Michele Battaglia, Pasquale Ditonno","doi":"10.1177/03915603241300877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) is a well-known complication of prostate cancer treatments, observed in up to 26% of the cases after radical prostatectomy. Conservative management, with single or even repeated transurethral dilation or endoscopic incision of the stenosis, is successful in many cases, but up to 9% of patients are destined to fail after endoscopic treatment. In these cases, a revision of the vesicourethral anastomosis is necessary and can be realized with different surgical approaches. We aim to describe the technique and the outcomes of a new prerectal approach for VUAS repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients with recalcitrant VUAS following radical prostatectomy were enrolled between May 2014 and September 2018 for prerectal transperineal re-anastomosis. The evaluated outcomes were: the rate of successful anatomical repair at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up, postoperative incontinence and complications rate, and the need for further treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No major intraoperative complications occurred. After a median follow-up of 46 months (IQR 36-55), 10 patients (83.3%) achieved a good anatomical repair even if one man required an endoscopic urethrotomy, while two patients (16.67%) with a history of pelvic radiotherapy developed a surgical site infection that required toilette and external urinary diversion. Among the others, nine (75%) developed severe stress urinary incontinence, with resolution of their condition. No patient reported significant postoperative pain or fecal incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prerectal approach to VUAS repair allows direct access to the posterior urethra and the anastomosis, providing a better mobilization of the bladder neck for tension-free anastomosis. However, patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy have a higher risk of complications. Postoperative incontinence is very common, but urinary continence could be restored with subsequent artificial urinary sphincter placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603241300877"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach to repair recurrent vescicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: The use of prerectal access.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Vitarelli, Paolo Minafra, Marco Vulpi, Alberto Piana, Giuseppe Torre, Umberto Carbonara, Lucia Divenuto, Giuseppe Papapicco, Francesco Chiaradia, Stefano Alba, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Michele Battaglia, Pasquale Ditonno\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03915603241300877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) is a well-known complication of prostate cancer treatments, observed in up to 26% of the cases after radical prostatectomy. Conservative management, with single or even repeated transurethral dilation or endoscopic incision of the stenosis, is successful in many cases, but up to 9% of patients are destined to fail after endoscopic treatment. In these cases, a revision of the vesicourethral anastomosis is necessary and can be realized with different surgical approaches. We aim to describe the technique and the outcomes of a new prerectal approach for VUAS repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients with recalcitrant VUAS following radical prostatectomy were enrolled between May 2014 and September 2018 for prerectal transperineal re-anastomosis. The evaluated outcomes were: the rate of successful anatomical repair at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up, postoperative incontinence and complications rate, and the need for further treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No major intraoperative complications occurred. After a median follow-up of 46 months (IQR 36-55), 10 patients (83.3%) achieved a good anatomical repair even if one man required an endoscopic urethrotomy, while two patients (16.67%) with a history of pelvic radiotherapy developed a surgical site infection that required toilette and external urinary diversion. Among the others, nine (75%) developed severe stress urinary incontinence, with resolution of their condition. No patient reported significant postoperative pain or fecal incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prerectal approach to VUAS repair allows direct access to the posterior urethra and the anastomosis, providing a better mobilization of the bladder neck for tension-free anastomosis. However, patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy have a higher risk of complications. Postoperative incontinence is very common, but urinary continence could be restored with subsequent artificial urinary sphincter placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3915603241300877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241300877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241300877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膀胱尿道吻合口狭窄(VUAS)是前列腺癌治疗的一个众所周知的并发症,在根治性前列腺切除术后高达26%的病例中观察到。保守治疗,单次甚至多次经尿道扩张或内镜下切开狭窄,在许多情况下是成功的,但高达9%的患者在内镜下治疗后注定失败。在这种情况下,膀胱输尿管吻合术的改良是必要的,可以通过不同的手术入路来实现。我们的目的是描述技术和结果的一种新的直肠前入路VUAS修复。方法:选取2014年5月至2018年9月根治性前列腺切除术后顽固性vas患者12例进行直肠经会阴再吻合。评估结果为:术后3个月及末次随访解剖修复成功率、术后尿失禁及并发症发生率、进一步治疗的需要。结果:术中无重大并发症发生。中位随访46个月后(IQR 36-55), 10例患者(83.3%)即使需要内镜下尿道切开术也获得了良好的解剖修复,而2例(16.67%)有盆腔放疗史的患者发生手术部位感染,需要上厕所和外尿转移。在其他患者中,9例(75%)出现了严重的压力性尿失禁,但病情得到了缓解。没有患者报告明显的术后疼痛或大便失禁。结论:经直肠入路行VUAS修复可直接进入后尿道及吻合口,可更好地调动膀胱颈进行无张力吻合。然而,有盆腔放疗史的患者有更高的并发症风险。术后尿失禁是非常常见的,但尿失禁可以通过后续人工尿道括约肌置入恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new approach to repair recurrent vescicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: The use of prerectal access.

Background: Vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) is a well-known complication of prostate cancer treatments, observed in up to 26% of the cases after radical prostatectomy. Conservative management, with single or even repeated transurethral dilation or endoscopic incision of the stenosis, is successful in many cases, but up to 9% of patients are destined to fail after endoscopic treatment. In these cases, a revision of the vesicourethral anastomosis is necessary and can be realized with different surgical approaches. We aim to describe the technique and the outcomes of a new prerectal approach for VUAS repair.

Methods: Twelve patients with recalcitrant VUAS following radical prostatectomy were enrolled between May 2014 and September 2018 for prerectal transperineal re-anastomosis. The evaluated outcomes were: the rate of successful anatomical repair at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up, postoperative incontinence and complications rate, and the need for further treatments.

Results: No major intraoperative complications occurred. After a median follow-up of 46 months (IQR 36-55), 10 patients (83.3%) achieved a good anatomical repair even if one man required an endoscopic urethrotomy, while two patients (16.67%) with a history of pelvic radiotherapy developed a surgical site infection that required toilette and external urinary diversion. Among the others, nine (75%) developed severe stress urinary incontinence, with resolution of their condition. No patient reported significant postoperative pain or fecal incontinence.

Conclusions: The prerectal approach to VUAS repair allows direct access to the posterior urethra and the anastomosis, providing a better mobilization of the bladder neck for tension-free anastomosis. However, patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy have a higher risk of complications. Postoperative incontinence is very common, but urinary continence could be restored with subsequent artificial urinary sphincter placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Short-term effect of mirabegron on female sexual function in women with overactive bladder. Thanks to reviewers. "Is oral antioxidant (Vit C & E) helpful in minimizing shock wave induced renal damage? A study from a tertiary care Center from eastern India" A prospective study. "To get to know, to discover, to publish-this is the destiny of a scientist" (Froinçois Arago). Exploring the potential of BOLA3-DT as a diagnostic biomarker in prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1