验证加拿大出院摘要数据库中与早产有关的围产期和新生儿数据,以促进对早产儿的长期预后研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2024-10-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2380
Deepak Louis, Peace Eshemokhai, Chelsea Ruth, Kristene Cheung, Lisa M Lix, Lisa Flaten, Prakesh S Shah, Allan Garland
{"title":"验证加拿大出院摘要数据库中与早产有关的围产期和新生儿数据,以促进对早产儿的长期预后研究。","authors":"Deepak Louis, Peace Eshemokhai, Chelsea Ruth, Kristene Cheung, Lisa M Lix, Lisa Flaten, Prakesh S Shah, Allan Garland","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Canadian Institute of Health Information's (CIHI) Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) contains standardised administrative data on all hospitalisations in Canada, excluding Quebec.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to validate preterm birth related perinatal and neonatal data in DAD by assessing its accuracy against the reference standard of the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked birth hospitalization data between the DAD and CNN databases for all neonates born <33 weeks gestational age (GA) admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Winnipeg, Canada, between 2010 and 2022. A comprehensive list of maternal and neonatal variables relevant to preterm birth was chosen <i>a priori</i> for validation. For categorical variables, we measured correlation using Cohen's weighted kappa (k) and for continuous variables, we measured agreement using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2084 neonates were included (mean GA 29.4 ± 2.4 weeks; birth weight 1430 ± 461g). Baseline continuous maternal and neonatal variables showed excellent accuracy in DAD [Maternal age: LCCC = 0.99 (0.99, 0.99); GA: LCCC = 0.95 (0.95, 0.96); birth weight: LCCC = 0.97 (0.96, 0.97); sex: k = 0.99 (0.98-0.99)]. In contrast, the accuracy of the maternal baseline categorical variables and neonatal outcomes and interventions ranged from very good to poor [e.g., Caesarean section: k = 0.91 (0.89-0.93), pre-gestational diabetes: k = 0.04 (0.03-0.05), neonatal sepsis: k = 0.37 (0.31-0.42), bronchopulmonary dysplasia: k = 0.26 (0.19-0.33), neonatal laparotomy: k = 0.55 (0.43-067)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neonatal variables such as gestational age and birth weight had high accuracy in DAD, while the accuracy of maternal and neonatal morbidities and interventions were variable, with some being poor. Reasons for the inaccuracy of these variables should be identified and measures taken to improve them.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"2380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of preterm birth related perinatal and neonatal data in the Canadian discharge abstract database to facilitate long-term outcomes research of individuals born preterm.\",\"authors\":\"Deepak Louis, Peace Eshemokhai, Chelsea Ruth, Kristene Cheung, Lisa M Lix, Lisa Flaten, Prakesh S Shah, Allan Garland\",\"doi\":\"10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Canadian Institute of Health Information's (CIHI) Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) contains standardised administrative data on all hospitalisations in Canada, excluding Quebec.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to validate preterm birth related perinatal and neonatal data in DAD by assessing its accuracy against the reference standard of the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked birth hospitalization data between the DAD and CNN databases for all neonates born <33 weeks gestational age (GA) admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Winnipeg, Canada, between 2010 and 2022. A comprehensive list of maternal and neonatal variables relevant to preterm birth was chosen <i>a priori</i> for validation. For categorical variables, we measured correlation using Cohen's weighted kappa (k) and for continuous variables, we measured agreement using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2084 neonates were included (mean GA 29.4 ± 2.4 weeks; birth weight 1430 ± 461g). Baseline continuous maternal and neonatal variables showed excellent accuracy in DAD [Maternal age: LCCC = 0.99 (0.99, 0.99); GA: LCCC = 0.95 (0.95, 0.96); birth weight: LCCC = 0.97 (0.96, 0.97); sex: k = 0.99 (0.98-0.99)]. In contrast, the accuracy of the maternal baseline categorical variables and neonatal outcomes and interventions ranged from very good to poor [e.g., Caesarean section: k = 0.91 (0.89-0.93), pre-gestational diabetes: k = 0.04 (0.03-0.05), neonatal sepsis: k = 0.37 (0.31-0.42), bronchopulmonary dysplasia: k = 0.26 (0.19-0.33), neonatal laparotomy: k = 0.55 (0.43-067)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neonatal variables such as gestational age and birth weight had high accuracy in DAD, while the accuracy of maternal and neonatal morbidities and interventions were variable, with some being poor. Reasons for the inaccuracy of these variables should be identified and measures taken to improve them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"2380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636633/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Population Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大卫生信息研究所(CIHI)出院摘要数据库(DAD)包含加拿大除魁北克外所有住院的标准化管理数据。目的:我们旨在通过对比加拿大新生儿网络(CNN)数据库的参考标准来评估DAD中与早产相关的围产期和新生儿数据的准确性。方法:我们将DAD和CNN数据库中所有先天出生的新生儿的出生住院数据联系起来进行验证。对于分类变量,我们使用Cohen的加权kappa (k)来衡量相关性,对于连续变量,我们使用Lin的一致性相关系数(LCCC)来衡量一致性。结果:共纳入新生儿2084例(平均GA 29.4±2.4周;出生体重1430±461g)。基线连续的产妇和新生儿变量显示出极好的DAD准确性[产妇年龄:LCCC = 0.99 (0.99, 0.99);Ga: LCCC = 0.95 (0.95, 0.96);出生体重:LCCC = 0.97 (0.96, 0.97);性别:k = 0.99(0.98-0.99)]。相比之下,产妇基线分类变量和新生儿结局及干预措施的准确性从很好到很差[例如,剖宫产:k = 0.91(0.89-0.93),妊娠前糖尿病:k = 0.04(0.03-0.05),新生儿脓毒症:k = 0.37(0.31-0.42),支气管肺发育不良:k = 0.26(0.19-0.33),新生儿剖腹手术:k = 0.55(0.43-067)]。结论:胎龄、出生体重等新生儿变量在DAD诊断中准确性较高,而孕产妇和新生儿发病率及干预措施的准确性存在差异,有的准确性较差。应查明这些变量不准确的原因,并采取措施加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of preterm birth related perinatal and neonatal data in the Canadian discharge abstract database to facilitate long-term outcomes research of individuals born preterm.

Introduction: The Canadian Institute of Health Information's (CIHI) Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) contains standardised administrative data on all hospitalisations in Canada, excluding Quebec.

Objectives: We aimed to validate preterm birth related perinatal and neonatal data in DAD by assessing its accuracy against the reference standard of the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) database.

Methods: We linked birth hospitalization data between the DAD and CNN databases for all neonates born <33 weeks gestational age (GA) admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Winnipeg, Canada, between 2010 and 2022. A comprehensive list of maternal and neonatal variables relevant to preterm birth was chosen a priori for validation. For categorical variables, we measured correlation using Cohen's weighted kappa (k) and for continuous variables, we measured agreement using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC).

Results: 2084 neonates were included (mean GA 29.4 ± 2.4 weeks; birth weight 1430 ± 461g). Baseline continuous maternal and neonatal variables showed excellent accuracy in DAD [Maternal age: LCCC = 0.99 (0.99, 0.99); GA: LCCC = 0.95 (0.95, 0.96); birth weight: LCCC = 0.97 (0.96, 0.97); sex: k = 0.99 (0.98-0.99)]. In contrast, the accuracy of the maternal baseline categorical variables and neonatal outcomes and interventions ranged from very good to poor [e.g., Caesarean section: k = 0.91 (0.89-0.93), pre-gestational diabetes: k = 0.04 (0.03-0.05), neonatal sepsis: k = 0.37 (0.31-0.42), bronchopulmonary dysplasia: k = 0.26 (0.19-0.33), neonatal laparotomy: k = 0.55 (0.43-067)].

Conclusion: Neonatal variables such as gestational age and birth weight had high accuracy in DAD, while the accuracy of maternal and neonatal morbidities and interventions were variable, with some being poor. Reasons for the inaccuracy of these variables should be identified and measures taken to improve them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Neonates With In-Utero SSRI Exposure (NeoWISE): a retrospective cohort study examining the effect of newborn feeding method on newborn withdrawal. Secondary use of routinely collected administrative health data for epidemiologic research: Answering research questions using data collected for a different purpose. Validity of heart failure diagnoses, treatments, and readmissions in the Danish National Patient Registry. Creating an 11-year longitudinal substance use harm cohort from linked health and census data to analyse social drivers of health. Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1