Lucian G Vlad, Joseph Rolley, Shabnam Vaezzadeh, Lisa Gould, Caroline E Fife, Vickie R Driver, Anokhi J Kapasi, John C Lantis Ii, Sharmila A Kamani, Burak K Pakkal
{"title":"全面分析现实世界中可用的伤口护理数据。","authors":"Lucian G Vlad, Joseph Rolley, Shabnam Vaezzadeh, Lisa Gould, Caroline E Fife, Vickie R Driver, Anokhi J Kapasi, John C Lantis Ii, Sharmila A Kamani, Burak K Pakkal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) aims to assess current usable real-world data (RWD) sources to determine which real-world databases (DBs) are suitable and usable for studying the natural history of chronic wounds. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not fully reflect the complexity of patients with chronic wounds. Using RWD, establishment of a scientifically grounded \"road map\" for RCTs is needed to better navigate the real-world complexity of the patients with chronic wounds. The long-term objectives include identifying patients ineligible to receive evidence-based advanced treatment and diagnostic options, reducing patient suffering, and providing decision support for regulatory bodies, payers, and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify available and usable RWD on US chronic wound care patients, as an early step toward the WCCC's objectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA® methodology, the WCCC conducted a comprehensive RWD landscape analysis and systematically screened 34 potential sources for chronic wounds. Multiple data elements helped determine suitability and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four clinical US DBs have \"high potential\" for elucidating the natural history of chronic wounds; a fifth met the WCCC criteria but has data access restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying suitable, usable real-world DBs for research is complex. Only 1 DB was found that is fit for purpose and matches the goals to study the natural history of patients with chronic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"36 11","pages":"384-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive landscape analysis for usable real-world wound care data.\",\"authors\":\"Lucian G Vlad, Joseph Rolley, Shabnam Vaezzadeh, Lisa Gould, Caroline E Fife, Vickie R Driver, Anokhi J Kapasi, John C Lantis Ii, Sharmila A Kamani, Burak K Pakkal\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) aims to assess current usable real-world data (RWD) sources to determine which real-world databases (DBs) are suitable and usable for studying the natural history of chronic wounds. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not fully reflect the complexity of patients with chronic wounds. Using RWD, establishment of a scientifically grounded \\\"road map\\\" for RCTs is needed to better navigate the real-world complexity of the patients with chronic wounds. The long-term objectives include identifying patients ineligible to receive evidence-based advanced treatment and diagnostic options, reducing patient suffering, and providing decision support for regulatory bodies, payers, and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify available and usable RWD on US chronic wound care patients, as an early step toward the WCCC's objectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA® methodology, the WCCC conducted a comprehensive RWD landscape analysis and systematically screened 34 potential sources for chronic wounds. Multiple data elements helped determine suitability and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four clinical US DBs have \\\"high potential\\\" for elucidating the natural history of chronic wounds; a fifth met the WCCC criteria but has data access restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying suitable, usable real-world DBs for research is complex. Only 1 DB was found that is fit for purpose and matches the goals to study the natural history of patients with chronic wounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"volume\":\"36 11\",\"pages\":\"384-391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:伤口护理协作社区(WCCC)旨在评估当前可用的真实世界数据(RWD)来源,以确定哪些真实世界数据库(db)适合并可用于研究慢性伤口的自然史。随机对照试验(RCTs)不能完全反映慢性伤口患者的复杂性。使用RWD,需要为随机对照试验建立一个有科学依据的“路线图”,以更好地驾驭慢性伤口患者的现实世界复杂性。长期目标包括确定没有资格接受循证高级治疗和诊断方案的患者,减少患者的痛苦,并为监管机构、支付方和临床医生提供决策支持。目的:确定美国慢性伤口护理患者可用和可用的RWD,作为实现WCCC目标的早期步骤。方法:采用B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA®方法,WCCC进行了全面的RWD景观分析,并系统筛选了34个慢性伤口的潜在来源。多个数据元素有助于确定适用性和可用性。结果:4种临床US db在阐明慢性伤口的自然史方面具有“高潜力”;五分之一符合WCCC标准,但有数据访问限制。结论:为研究确定合适的、可用的现实世界db是复杂的。只有1个DB符合目的,符合研究慢性伤口患者自然史的目标。
Comprehensive landscape analysis for usable real-world wound care data.
Background: The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) aims to assess current usable real-world data (RWD) sources to determine which real-world databases (DBs) are suitable and usable for studying the natural history of chronic wounds. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not fully reflect the complexity of patients with chronic wounds. Using RWD, establishment of a scientifically grounded "road map" for RCTs is needed to better navigate the real-world complexity of the patients with chronic wounds. The long-term objectives include identifying patients ineligible to receive evidence-based advanced treatment and diagnostic options, reducing patient suffering, and providing decision support for regulatory bodies, payers, and clinicians.
Objective: To identify available and usable RWD on US chronic wound care patients, as an early step toward the WCCC's objectives.
Methods: Using B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA® methodology, the WCCC conducted a comprehensive RWD landscape analysis and systematically screened 34 potential sources for chronic wounds. Multiple data elements helped determine suitability and usability.
Results: Four clinical US DBs have "high potential" for elucidating the natural history of chronic wounds; a fifth met the WCCC criteria but has data access restrictions.
Conclusion: Identifying suitable, usable real-world DBs for research is complex. Only 1 DB was found that is fit for purpose and matches the goals to study the natural history of patients with chronic wounds.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.