全面分析现实世界中可用的伤口护理数据。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Lucian G Vlad, Joseph Rolley, Shabnam Vaezzadeh, Lisa Gould, Caroline E Fife, Vickie R Driver, Anokhi J Kapasi, John C Lantis Ii, Sharmila A Kamani, Burak K Pakkal
{"title":"全面分析现实世界中可用的伤口护理数据。","authors":"Lucian G Vlad, Joseph Rolley, Shabnam Vaezzadeh, Lisa Gould, Caroline E Fife, Vickie R Driver, Anokhi J Kapasi, John C Lantis Ii, Sharmila A Kamani, Burak K Pakkal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) aims to assess current usable real-world data (RWD) sources to determine which real-world databases (DBs) are suitable and usable for studying the natural history of chronic wounds. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not fully reflect the complexity of patients with chronic wounds. Using RWD, establishment of a scientifically grounded \"road map\" for RCTs is needed to better navigate the real-world complexity of the patients with chronic wounds. The long-term objectives include identifying patients ineligible to receive evidence-based advanced treatment and diagnostic options, reducing patient suffering, and providing decision support for regulatory bodies, payers, and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify available and usable RWD on US chronic wound care patients, as an early step toward the WCCC's objectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA® methodology, the WCCC conducted a comprehensive RWD landscape analysis and systematically screened 34 potential sources for chronic wounds. Multiple data elements helped determine suitability and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four clinical US DBs have \"high potential\" for elucidating the natural history of chronic wounds; a fifth met the WCCC criteria but has data access restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying suitable, usable real-world DBs for research is complex. Only 1 DB was found that is fit for purpose and matches the goals to study the natural history of patients with chronic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"36 11","pages":"384-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive landscape analysis for usable real-world wound care data.\",\"authors\":\"Lucian G Vlad, Joseph Rolley, Shabnam Vaezzadeh, Lisa Gould, Caroline E Fife, Vickie R Driver, Anokhi J Kapasi, John C Lantis Ii, Sharmila A Kamani, Burak K Pakkal\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) aims to assess current usable real-world data (RWD) sources to determine which real-world databases (DBs) are suitable and usable for studying the natural history of chronic wounds. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not fully reflect the complexity of patients with chronic wounds. Using RWD, establishment of a scientifically grounded \\\"road map\\\" for RCTs is needed to better navigate the real-world complexity of the patients with chronic wounds. The long-term objectives include identifying patients ineligible to receive evidence-based advanced treatment and diagnostic options, reducing patient suffering, and providing decision support for regulatory bodies, payers, and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify available and usable RWD on US chronic wound care patients, as an early step toward the WCCC's objectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA® methodology, the WCCC conducted a comprehensive RWD landscape analysis and systematically screened 34 potential sources for chronic wounds. Multiple data elements helped determine suitability and usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four clinical US DBs have \\\"high potential\\\" for elucidating the natural history of chronic wounds; a fifth met the WCCC criteria but has data access restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying suitable, usable real-world DBs for research is complex. Only 1 DB was found that is fit for purpose and matches the goals to study the natural history of patients with chronic wounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"volume\":\"36 11\",\"pages\":\"384-391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伤口护理协作社区(WCCC)旨在评估当前可用的真实世界数据(RWD)来源,以确定哪些真实世界数据库(db)适合并可用于研究慢性伤口的自然史。随机对照试验(RCTs)不能完全反映慢性伤口患者的复杂性。使用RWD,需要为随机对照试验建立一个有科学依据的“路线图”,以更好地驾驭慢性伤口患者的现实世界复杂性。长期目标包括确定没有资格接受循证高级治疗和诊断方案的患者,减少患者的痛苦,并为监管机构、支付方和临床医生提供决策支持。目的:确定美国慢性伤口护理患者可用和可用的RWD,作为实现WCCC目标的早期步骤。方法:采用B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA®方法,WCCC进行了全面的RWD景观分析,并系统筛选了34个慢性伤口的潜在来源。多个数据元素有助于确定适用性和可用性。结果:4种临床US db在阐明慢性伤口的自然史方面具有“高潜力”;五分之一符合WCCC标准,但有数据访问限制。结论:为研究确定合适的、可用的现实世界db是复杂的。只有1个DB符合目的,符合研究慢性伤口患者自然史的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive landscape analysis for usable real-world wound care data.

Background: The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) aims to assess current usable real-world data (RWD) sources to determine which real-world databases (DBs) are suitable and usable for studying the natural history of chronic wounds. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not fully reflect the complexity of patients with chronic wounds. Using RWD, establishment of a scientifically grounded "road map" for RCTs is needed to better navigate the real-world complexity of the patients with chronic wounds. The long-term objectives include identifying patients ineligible to receive evidence-based advanced treatment and diagnostic options, reducing patient suffering, and providing decision support for regulatory bodies, payers, and clinicians.

Objective: To identify available and usable RWD on US chronic wound care patients, as an early step toward the WCCC's objectives.

Methods: Using B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA® methodology, the WCCC conducted a comprehensive RWD landscape analysis and systematically screened 34 potential sources for chronic wounds. Multiple data elements helped determine suitability and usability.

Results: Four clinical US DBs have "high potential" for elucidating the natural history of chronic wounds; a fifth met the WCCC criteria but has data access restrictions.

Conclusion: Identifying suitable, usable real-world DBs for research is complex. Only 1 DB was found that is fit for purpose and matches the goals to study the natural history of patients with chronic wounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Wounds resulting from intradermal injection of sodium hypochlorite: a case report. Application of clinician support tools to improve wound healing outcomes and simplify treatment selection for effective exudate management. Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement: mechanism of action in the wound environment. A literature review. Collaboration encourages innovation: setting new standards in wound care with the Wound Care Collaborative Community expert panel consensus Recommendations. Effect of introduction of elastic compression bandages on quality of life in patients with lower extremity vascular skin ulcers: a prospective study correlating WOUND-Q patient-reported outcome measures and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1