患者对初级医疗中使用决策辅助工具进行主动戒烟咨询的反应:定性研究。

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X241304271
Anne Boesch, Marie-Anne Durand, Ines Habfast-Robertson, Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski, Ivan Berlin, Kevin Selby
{"title":"患者对初级医疗中使用决策辅助工具进行主动戒烟咨询的反应:定性研究。","authors":"Anne Boesch, Marie-Anne Durand, Ines Habfast-Robertson, Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski, Ivan Berlin, Kevin Selby","doi":"10.1177/1179173X241304271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medications for smoking cessation can double quit rates but are underused in primary care. This qualitative study aimed to explore: (1) patients' perspectives regarding having their general practitioner (GP) use a proactive approach to smoking cessation treatment using an encounter decision aid (DA), and (2) their expectations regarding their GP's role. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants of the FIRST randomized trial (adults who smoke daily with any level of motivation for tobacco quitting). In the FIRST study, the intervention was a half-day course teaching GPs to use a proactive approach using a DA. Control GPs received a 1-h refresher training. Phone interviews were run 5-16 weeks after a routine visit with their GP. A thematic data analysis was performed with 20% double independent coding. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews (mean age 49 years, 55% female). In the intervention group (n = 12), 7 participants appreciated the DA, saw it as useful, usable, and valuable. Two participants did not find it helpful and 3 did not recall having used it. Participants felt their GP provided moral support, more than from a specialist (cardiologist or pulmonologist) because their GP knows them better and has more time during the visit. They felt that the most important factor influencing smoking cessation was their own motivation, not treatment. Most participants appreciated the DA. Most participants did not perceive medications as part of quitting. They thought quitting was a matter of motivation. A DA could be an acceptable way to encourage use of treatments to aid with tobacco cessation. An early presentation of treatment options to all persons who smokes may encourage them to request a treatment when ready to quit smoking. Patient perceptions of the role of GPs and treatments for smoking cessation may be a barrier to seeking help to quit.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"17 ","pages":"1179173X241304271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient reactions to proactive tobacco cessation counseling using a decision aid in primary care: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Boesch, Marie-Anne Durand, Ines Habfast-Robertson, Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski, Ivan Berlin, Kevin Selby\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179173X241304271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medications for smoking cessation can double quit rates but are underused in primary care. This qualitative study aimed to explore: (1) patients' perspectives regarding having their general practitioner (GP) use a proactive approach to smoking cessation treatment using an encounter decision aid (DA), and (2) their expectations regarding their GP's role. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants of the FIRST randomized trial (adults who smoke daily with any level of motivation for tobacco quitting). In the FIRST study, the intervention was a half-day course teaching GPs to use a proactive approach using a DA. Control GPs received a 1-h refresher training. Phone interviews were run 5-16 weeks after a routine visit with their GP. A thematic data analysis was performed with 20% double independent coding. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews (mean age 49 years, 55% female). In the intervention group (n = 12), 7 participants appreciated the DA, saw it as useful, usable, and valuable. Two participants did not find it helpful and 3 did not recall having used it. Participants felt their GP provided moral support, more than from a specialist (cardiologist or pulmonologist) because their GP knows them better and has more time during the visit. They felt that the most important factor influencing smoking cessation was their own motivation, not treatment. Most participants appreciated the DA. Most participants did not perceive medications as part of quitting. They thought quitting was a matter of motivation. A DA could be an acceptable way to encourage use of treatments to aid with tobacco cessation. An early presentation of treatment options to all persons who smokes may encourage them to request a treatment when ready to quit smoking. Patient perceptions of the role of GPs and treatments for smoking cessation may be a barrier to seeking help to quit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Use Insights\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1179173X241304271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635857/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Use Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X241304271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X241304271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

戒烟药物可使戒烟率提高一倍,但在全科医疗中的使用率却很低。本定性研究旨在探讨:(1)患者对其全科医生(GP)使用会诊辅助决策系统(DA)进行主动戒烟治疗的看法;(2)患者对全科医生角色的期望。我们对 FIRST 随机试验的参与者(每天吸烟且有任何戒烟动机的成年人)进行了半结构化定性访谈。在FIRST研究中,干预措施是通过为期半天的课程,教导全科医生使用DA主动戒烟法。对照组全科医生接受了 1 小时的复习培训。在全科医生例行就诊 5-16 周后进行电话访谈。我们对数据进行了专题分析,并进行了 20% 的双重独立编码。我们进行了 20 次半结构化访谈(平均年龄 49 岁,55% 为女性)。在干预组(n = 12)中,7 名参与者对诊断书表示赞赏,认为诊断书有用、可用且有价值。两名参与者认为它没有帮助,3 名参与者不记得使用过它。参与者认为全科医生提供的精神支持多于专科医生(心脏病专家或肺病专家)提供的精神支持,因为全科医生更了解他们,在就诊时有更多的时间。他们认为影响戒烟的最重要因素是自己的动机,而不是治疗。大多数参与者对DA表示赞赏。大多数参与者并不认为药物治疗是戒烟的一部分。他们认为戒烟是一个动机问题。戒烟咨询可能是鼓励使用戒烟治疗的一种可接受的方式。及早向所有吸烟者介绍治疗方案可能会鼓励他们在准备戒烟时申请治疗。患者对全科医生的角色和戒烟治疗的看法可能会阻碍他们寻求戒烟帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient reactions to proactive tobacco cessation counseling using a decision aid in primary care: A qualitative study.

Medications for smoking cessation can double quit rates but are underused in primary care. This qualitative study aimed to explore: (1) patients' perspectives regarding having their general practitioner (GP) use a proactive approach to smoking cessation treatment using an encounter decision aid (DA), and (2) their expectations regarding their GP's role. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants of the FIRST randomized trial (adults who smoke daily with any level of motivation for tobacco quitting). In the FIRST study, the intervention was a half-day course teaching GPs to use a proactive approach using a DA. Control GPs received a 1-h refresher training. Phone interviews were run 5-16 weeks after a routine visit with their GP. A thematic data analysis was performed with 20% double independent coding. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews (mean age 49 years, 55% female). In the intervention group (n = 12), 7 participants appreciated the DA, saw it as useful, usable, and valuable. Two participants did not find it helpful and 3 did not recall having used it. Participants felt their GP provided moral support, more than from a specialist (cardiologist or pulmonologist) because their GP knows them better and has more time during the visit. They felt that the most important factor influencing smoking cessation was their own motivation, not treatment. Most participants appreciated the DA. Most participants did not perceive medications as part of quitting. They thought quitting was a matter of motivation. A DA could be an acceptable way to encourage use of treatments to aid with tobacco cessation. An early presentation of treatment options to all persons who smokes may encourage them to request a treatment when ready to quit smoking. Patient perceptions of the role of GPs and treatments for smoking cessation may be a barrier to seeking help to quit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Smoking Attitudes and Behaviors Among Adolescents in the Gaza Strip: Findings From the 2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Corrigendum to "Prospective Association Between Tobacco Use and at-Risk Alcohol Consumption Among Swedish Adolescents: Outlining the Influence of Tobacco Product, Frequency of Use and Gender in the LoRDIA Cohort". Marketing Strategies and Consumer and Sellers Perception About Oral Nicotine Pouches in Karachi, Pakistan. Patient reactions to proactive tobacco cessation counseling using a decision aid in primary care: A qualitative study. Predictors of Enrollment and Adherence in a Randomized Tobacco Cessation Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1