Holly Walton, Morgan Daniel, Michelle Peter, Hannah McInnes-Dean, Rhiannon Mellis, Stephanie Allen, Naomi J Fulop, Lyn S Chitty, Melissa Hill
{"title":"评估英格兰快速产前外显子组测序(pES)服务的实施情况。","authors":"Holly Walton, Morgan Daniel, Michelle Peter, Hannah McInnes-Dean, Rhiannon Mellis, Stephanie Allen, Naomi J Fulop, Lyn S Chitty, Melissa Hill","doi":"10.1159/000543104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In October 2020, a national rapid prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service was rolled out across the English National Health Service (NHS). This service is delivered by multiple clinical and two laboratory teams. While there was high level national guidance to support implementation, it was unclear how the service had been delivered in practice. This study evaluated pES service implementation across England, using the major system change (MSC) framework to explore links between implementation approaches and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national mixed-methods multi-site study of 17 clinical genomics services, their linked fetal medicine services and two laboratories delivering the pES service. The MSC framework informed the study. Key documents, semi-structured interviews (eight national service developers, 55 staff), and surveys (n = 159 staff) were analysed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Findings were integrated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation was influenced by a range of factors including evidence of benefit, laboratory service reconfiguration, and stakeholder support. Local implementation approaches varied; seven models of service delivery were identified. Key differences between models included leadership, staffing, and multidisciplinary team approaches. Local staff factors (e.g., time, capacity, attitudes), pES service factors (e.g., communication/collaboration, logistics), and organisational factors (e.g., infrastructure and previous experience) influenced implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have identified multiple barriers and facilitators that are associated with implementing a major change to genomic services in a complex national healthcare system. This study highlights which models of pES may work in practice and why. Findings will inform future development of the pES service.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"34-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Implementation of the Rapid Prenatal Exome Sequencing Service in England.\",\"authors\":\"Holly Walton, Morgan Daniel, Michelle Peter, Hannah McInnes-Dean, Rhiannon Mellis, Stephanie Allen, Naomi J Fulop, Lyn S Chitty, Melissa Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In October 2020, a national rapid prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service was rolled out across the English National Health Service (NHS). This service is delivered by multiple clinical and two laboratory teams. While there was high level national guidance to support implementation, it was unclear how the service had been delivered in practice. This study evaluated pES service implementation across England, using the major system change (MSC) framework to explore links between implementation approaches and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national mixed-methods multi-site study of 17 clinical genomics services, their linked fetal medicine services and two laboratories delivering the pES service. The MSC framework informed the study. Key documents, semi-structured interviews (eight national service developers, 55 staff), and surveys (n = 159 staff) were analysed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Findings were integrated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation was influenced by a range of factors including evidence of benefit, laboratory service reconfiguration, and stakeholder support. Local implementation approaches varied; seven models of service delivery were identified. Key differences between models included leadership, staffing, and multidisciplinary team approaches. Local staff factors (e.g., time, capacity, attitudes), pES service factors (e.g., communication/collaboration, logistics), and organisational factors (e.g., infrastructure and previous experience) influenced implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have identified multiple barriers and facilitators that are associated with implementing a major change to genomic services in a complex national healthcare system. This study highlights which models of pES may work in practice and why. Findings will inform future development of the pES service.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言 2020 年 10 月,一项全国性的产前外显子组快速测序(pES)服务在英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)全面铺开。这项服务由多个临床团队和两个实验室团队提供。虽然有高水平的国家指南来支持这项服务的实施,但目前还不清楚这项服务在实践中是如何开展的。本研究评估了英格兰的 pES 服务实施情况,并使用 "重大系统变革框架 "探讨了实施方法与结果之间的联系。方法 我们对 17 家临床基因组学服务机构、与之相关的胎儿医学服务机构以及两家提供 pES 服务的实验室进行了一项全国性的多地点混合方法研究。主要系统变革框架为研究提供了依据。采用归纳和演绎主题分析法以及描述性统计法对关键文件、半结构式访谈(8 位国家服务开发人员、55 位员工)和调查(n=159 位员工)进行了分析。对分析结果进行了整合。结果 实施工作受到一系列因素的影响,包括效益证据、实验室服务重新配置和利益相关者的支持。当地的实施方法各不相同;确定了七种服务提供模式。不同模式之间的主要差异包括领导力、人员配备和多学科小组(MDT)方法。当地员工因素(如时间、能力、态度)、公共健康教育服务因素(如沟通/协作、后勤)和组织因素(如基础设施和以往经验)对实施工作产生了影响。结论 我们发现了在复杂的国家医疗保健系统中实施基因组服务重大变革的多重障碍和促进因素。本研究强调了哪些 pES 模式可能在实践中有效,以及为什么。研究结果将为 pES 服务的未来发展提供参考。
Evaluating the Implementation of the Rapid Prenatal Exome Sequencing Service in England.
Introduction: In October 2020, a national rapid prenatal exome sequencing (pES) service was rolled out across the English National Health Service (NHS). This service is delivered by multiple clinical and two laboratory teams. While there was high level national guidance to support implementation, it was unclear how the service had been delivered in practice. This study evaluated pES service implementation across England, using the major system change (MSC) framework to explore links between implementation approaches and outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a national mixed-methods multi-site study of 17 clinical genomics services, their linked fetal medicine services and two laboratories delivering the pES service. The MSC framework informed the study. Key documents, semi-structured interviews (eight national service developers, 55 staff), and surveys (n = 159 staff) were analysed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Findings were integrated.
Results: Implementation was influenced by a range of factors including evidence of benefit, laboratory service reconfiguration, and stakeholder support. Local implementation approaches varied; seven models of service delivery were identified. Key differences between models included leadership, staffing, and multidisciplinary team approaches. Local staff factors (e.g., time, capacity, attitudes), pES service factors (e.g., communication/collaboration, logistics), and organisational factors (e.g., infrastructure and previous experience) influenced implementation.
Conclusion: We have identified multiple barriers and facilitators that are associated with implementing a major change to genomic services in a complex national healthcare system. This study highlights which models of pES may work in practice and why. Findings will inform future development of the pES service.
期刊介绍:
''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.