{"title":"电针治疗疼痛:十年(2013-2022 年)文献计量分析和内容回顾更新》。","authors":"Balgis, Selfi Handayani, Nanang Wiyono","doi":"10.1089/acu.2023.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Each year, pain imposes significant economic and social burdens, such as increased physician visits, analgesic use, and decreased productivity. Electroacupuncture (EA) was first used in China and is a potential addition to existing pain-relief approaches. Globally and exponentially, the number of fundamental and clinical studies on EA has increased over the past decade. Most bibliometric studies in this area focus on acupuncture therapy. A prevalent quantitative and qualitative approach, bibliometric analysis scrutinizes published scholarly articles and can be used to assess advancements in specific research domains. Yet, to the best of the current authors' knowledge, no specific bibliometric analysis of EA as a pain therapy has yet been conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Article data were taken from the Scopus<sup>®</sup> database with the key words electroacupuncture or electro-acupuncture or electric acupuncture and pain. The timeframe was set between 2013 and 2022 in all forms, regardless of language barriers, resulting in a total of 1592 documents. The results of the data search were then analyzed with bibliometrics and VOSviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study showed the rapid growth in the study of EA in the last decade. Additionally, <i>Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine</i> is a major journal that frequently publishes articles on EA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite China's substantial publication output on EA, international collaboration is limited, particularly among nations other than the United States and China.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"36 4","pages":"189-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroacupuncture for Pain Therapy: A Bibliometric Analysis and Content Review Update for 1 Decade (2013-2022).\",\"authors\":\"Balgis, Selfi Handayani, Nanang Wiyono\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/acu.2023.0083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Each year, pain imposes significant economic and social burdens, such as increased physician visits, analgesic use, and decreased productivity. Electroacupuncture (EA) was first used in China and is a potential addition to existing pain-relief approaches. Globally and exponentially, the number of fundamental and clinical studies on EA has increased over the past decade. Most bibliometric studies in this area focus on acupuncture therapy. A prevalent quantitative and qualitative approach, bibliometric analysis scrutinizes published scholarly articles and can be used to assess advancements in specific research domains. Yet, to the best of the current authors' knowledge, no specific bibliometric analysis of EA as a pain therapy has yet been conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Article data were taken from the Scopus<sup>®</sup> database with the key words electroacupuncture or electro-acupuncture or electric acupuncture and pain. The timeframe was set between 2013 and 2022 in all forms, regardless of language barriers, resulting in a total of 1592 documents. The results of the data search were then analyzed with bibliometrics and VOSviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study showed the rapid growth in the study of EA in the last decade. Additionally, <i>Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine</i> is a major journal that frequently publishes articles on EA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite China's substantial publication output on EA, international collaboration is limited, particularly among nations other than the United States and China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Acupuncture\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"189-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632150/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Acupuncture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2023.0083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2023.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:每年,疼痛都会带来巨大的经济和社会负担,如就诊次数增加、镇痛药的使用和生产率下降等。电针(EA)最早在中国使用,是对现有止痛方法的一种潜在补充。在过去十年中,全球范围内有关 EA 的基础和临床研究呈指数级增长。这方面的文献计量学研究大多集中于针灸疗法。文献计量分析是一种普遍的定量和定性方法,它对已发表的学术文章进行仔细研究,可用于评估特定研究领域的进展情况。然而,就目前作者所知,还没有人对 EA 作为一种疼痛疗法进行过专门的文献计量分析:文章数据来自 Scopus® 数据库,关键词为 electroacupuncture 或 electro-acupuncture 或 electric acupuncture and pain。时间范围设定在 2013 年至 2022 年之间,不考虑语言障碍,以所有形式进行搜索,共搜索到 1592 篇文献。然后利用文献计量学和 VOSviewer 对数据搜索结果进行了分析:这项研究表明,在过去十年中,EA 研究迅速发展。此外,《循证补充与替代医学》也是经常发表 EA 相关文章的重要期刊:尽管中国在EA方面发表了大量文章,但国际合作却很有限,尤其是在美国和中国以外的国家之间。
Electroacupuncture for Pain Therapy: A Bibliometric Analysis and Content Review Update for 1 Decade (2013-2022).
Background: Each year, pain imposes significant economic and social burdens, such as increased physician visits, analgesic use, and decreased productivity. Electroacupuncture (EA) was first used in China and is a potential addition to existing pain-relief approaches. Globally and exponentially, the number of fundamental and clinical studies on EA has increased over the past decade. Most bibliometric studies in this area focus on acupuncture therapy. A prevalent quantitative and qualitative approach, bibliometric analysis scrutinizes published scholarly articles and can be used to assess advancements in specific research domains. Yet, to the best of the current authors' knowledge, no specific bibliometric analysis of EA as a pain therapy has yet been conducted.
Methods: Article data were taken from the Scopus® database with the key words electroacupuncture or electro-acupuncture or electric acupuncture and pain. The timeframe was set between 2013 and 2022 in all forms, regardless of language barriers, resulting in a total of 1592 documents. The results of the data search were then analyzed with bibliometrics and VOSviewer.
Results: This study showed the rapid growth in the study of EA in the last decade. Additionally, Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine is a major journal that frequently publishes articles on EA.
Conclusions: Despite China's substantial publication output on EA, international collaboration is limited, particularly among nations other than the United States and China.