老年人的联想记忆:联想记忆缺陷和过度结合效应的意义。

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1037/pag0000851
Joanna Hwang, Kathrine Whitman, Sharda Umanath
{"title":"老年人的联想记忆:联想记忆缺陷和过度结合效应的意义。","authors":"Joanna Hwang, Kathrine Whitman, Sharda Umanath","doi":"10.1037/pag0000851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aging is generally associated with differences in associative memory, which is memory for relationships between arbitrary pieces of information. There are two predominant explanations for age-related declines in associative memory: (a) the associative deficit hypothesis, which posits that older adults decline in their ability to form and retrieve associations, and (b) the inhibitory deficit hypothesis, which suggests that older adults bind more information together than intended-that is, they form and then struggle to ignore too many irrelevant associations, rather than bind too few appropriate associations. We sought to reconcile these two seemingly conflicting theories. First, we provide overviews of the two theoretical frameworks and their standard associated experimental paradigms. We then synthesize the existing literature in order to reach a resolution for the associative deficit hypothesis and inhibitory deficit hypothesis frameworks together: Evidence supporting both frameworks points to changes in effortful, controlled processing that lead to differential effects in associative memory function in aging. In revisiting the explanatory contribution of this long-standing theory of cognitive aging, we raise areas of interest and key considerations to advance future work on associative memory in older adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":"39 8","pages":"871-883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associative memory in older adults: Making sense of associative memory deficits and hyperbinding effects.\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Hwang, Kathrine Whitman, Sharda Umanath\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pag0000851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aging is generally associated with differences in associative memory, which is memory for relationships between arbitrary pieces of information. There are two predominant explanations for age-related declines in associative memory: (a) the associative deficit hypothesis, which posits that older adults decline in their ability to form and retrieve associations, and (b) the inhibitory deficit hypothesis, which suggests that older adults bind more information together than intended-that is, they form and then struggle to ignore too many irrelevant associations, rather than bind too few appropriate associations. We sought to reconcile these two seemingly conflicting theories. First, we provide overviews of the two theoretical frameworks and their standard associated experimental paradigms. We then synthesize the existing literature in order to reach a resolution for the associative deficit hypothesis and inhibitory deficit hypothesis frameworks together: Evidence supporting both frameworks points to changes in effortful, controlled processing that lead to differential effects in associative memory function in aging. In revisiting the explanatory contribution of this long-standing theory of cognitive aging, we raise areas of interest and key considerations to advance future work on associative memory in older adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"871-883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000851\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000851","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

衰老通常与联想记忆的差异有关,联想记忆是对任意信息之间关系的记忆。对于与年龄相关的联想记忆力下降,有两种主要的解释:(a)联想缺陷假说,即老年人形成和检索联想的能力下降;(b)抑制缺陷假说,即老年人将更多的信息绑定在一起,而不是将更多的信息绑定在一起。我们试图调和这两种看似矛盾的理论。首先,我们概述了这两种理论框架及其标准的相关实验范式。然后,我们对现有文献进行了综合,以共同解决联想缺失假说和抑制缺失假说框架的问题:支持这两个框架的证据都表明,在老龄化过程中,费力的、有控制的加工过程的变化会导致联想记忆功能的不同效果。在重新审视这一长期存在的认知老化理论的解释性贡献时,我们提出了一些值得关注的领域和关键考虑因素,以推动未来有关老年人联想记忆的工作。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associative memory in older adults: Making sense of associative memory deficits and hyperbinding effects.

Aging is generally associated with differences in associative memory, which is memory for relationships between arbitrary pieces of information. There are two predominant explanations for age-related declines in associative memory: (a) the associative deficit hypothesis, which posits that older adults decline in their ability to form and retrieve associations, and (b) the inhibitory deficit hypothesis, which suggests that older adults bind more information together than intended-that is, they form and then struggle to ignore too many irrelevant associations, rather than bind too few appropriate associations. We sought to reconcile these two seemingly conflicting theories. First, we provide overviews of the two theoretical frameworks and their standard associated experimental paradigms. We then synthesize the existing literature in order to reach a resolution for the associative deficit hypothesis and inhibitory deficit hypothesis frameworks together: Evidence supporting both frameworks points to changes in effortful, controlled processing that lead to differential effects in associative memory function in aging. In revisiting the explanatory contribution of this long-standing theory of cognitive aging, we raise areas of interest and key considerations to advance future work on associative memory in older adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
期刊最新文献
Can goal reminders reduce the Stroop effect in older adults? Emotion regulation success in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Neural biomarkers of age-related memory change. Advancing with age: Older adults excel in comprehension of novel metaphors. Age and sex differences in emotion perception are influenced by emotional category and communication channel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1