治疗压力与家庭护理的困境:对严重精神疾病患者亲属的基础理论研究》。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Qualitative Health Research Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1177/10497323241300042
Christin Hempeler, Matthé Scholten, Jakov Gather, Georg Juckel, Sarah Potthoff
{"title":"治疗压力与家庭护理的困境:对严重精神疾病患者亲属的基础理论研究》。","authors":"Christin Hempeler, Matthé Scholten, Jakov Gather, Georg Juckel, Sarah Potthoff","doi":"10.1177/10497323241300042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relatives are increasingly recognized as important in the care of people with a serious mental health condition, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Research indicates that in providing care, relatives use so-called treatment pressures, such as persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, or threats, to promote the treatment compliance of their family member. This grounded theory study investigated why relatives use treatment pressures by analyzing the experiences of relatives of people with a serious mental health condition before, during, and after mental health crises of their family member. We conducted 11 semi-structured, problem-centered interviews with such relatives in Germany between October 2019 and January 2020. Our analysis showed that the key category of relatives' experiences is a predicament characterized by feeling responsible to take action while experiencing a limited range of action. Relatives' perceived responsibility to take action had three dimensions: relatives' worries about their family member and other members of the family, societal norms and expectations, and the transfer of responsibility from the mental healthcare system to relatives. The limitation of relatives' scope of action also had three dimensions: their family member's opposition to treatment, legal criteria for involuntary commitment or treatment, and their dependency on mental healthcare professionals and the mental healthcare system. We reconstructed three different ways in which relatives may deal with this predicament: assuming responsibility for their family member's treatment, which involved exerting treatment pressures, staying out of their family member's mental health-related matters, and focusing on their own well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241300042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Pressures and the Predicament of Family Care: A Grounded Theory Study With Relatives of People With a Serious Mental Health Condition.\",\"authors\":\"Christin Hempeler, Matthé Scholten, Jakov Gather, Georg Juckel, Sarah Potthoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10497323241300042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Relatives are increasingly recognized as important in the care of people with a serious mental health condition, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Research indicates that in providing care, relatives use so-called treatment pressures, such as persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, or threats, to promote the treatment compliance of their family member. This grounded theory study investigated why relatives use treatment pressures by analyzing the experiences of relatives of people with a serious mental health condition before, during, and after mental health crises of their family member. We conducted 11 semi-structured, problem-centered interviews with such relatives in Germany between October 2019 and January 2020. Our analysis showed that the key category of relatives' experiences is a predicament characterized by feeling responsible to take action while experiencing a limited range of action. Relatives' perceived responsibility to take action had three dimensions: relatives' worries about their family member and other members of the family, societal norms and expectations, and the transfer of responsibility from the mental healthcare system to relatives. The limitation of relatives' scope of action also had three dimensions: their family member's opposition to treatment, legal criteria for involuntary commitment or treatment, and their dependency on mental healthcare professionals and the mental healthcare system. We reconstructed three different ways in which relatives may deal with this predicament: assuming responsibility for their family member's treatment, which involved exerting treatment pressures, staying out of their family member's mental health-related matters, and focusing on their own well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10497323241300042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241300042\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241300042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment Pressures and the Predicament of Family Care: A Grounded Theory Study With Relatives of People With a Serious Mental Health Condition.

Relatives are increasingly recognized as important in the care of people with a serious mental health condition, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Research indicates that in providing care, relatives use so-called treatment pressures, such as persuasion, interpersonal leverage, inducements, or threats, to promote the treatment compliance of their family member. This grounded theory study investigated why relatives use treatment pressures by analyzing the experiences of relatives of people with a serious mental health condition before, during, and after mental health crises of their family member. We conducted 11 semi-structured, problem-centered interviews with such relatives in Germany between October 2019 and January 2020. Our analysis showed that the key category of relatives' experiences is a predicament characterized by feeling responsible to take action while experiencing a limited range of action. Relatives' perceived responsibility to take action had three dimensions: relatives' worries about their family member and other members of the family, societal norms and expectations, and the transfer of responsibility from the mental healthcare system to relatives. The limitation of relatives' scope of action also had three dimensions: their family member's opposition to treatment, legal criteria for involuntary commitment or treatment, and their dependency on mental healthcare professionals and the mental healthcare system. We reconstructed three different ways in which relatives may deal with this predicament: assuming responsibility for their family member's treatment, which involved exerting treatment pressures, staying out of their family member's mental health-related matters, and focusing on their own well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
期刊最新文献
From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration. The Changing Care of Older Adults With Bipolar Disorder: A Narrative Analysis. Age Melancholy of Older Mizrahi Women Residing in Tel Aviv as a Social Loss: Exploring Intersections of Health and Social Support in an Ethnographic Study. The Emotional Aftermath of Surviving an Attempted Intimate Partner Homicide. Understanding the Experiences and Support Needs of Close Relatives in Psychiatric Euthanasia Trajectories: A Qualitative Exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1