Sean C Clark, Christopher V Nagelli, Xuankang Pan, Karissa N Simon, Rafael J Sierra, Mario Hevesi
{"title":"Is Periacetabular Osteotomy With Hip Arthroscopy Superior to Periacetabular Osteotomy Alone? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sean C Clark, Christopher V Nagelli, Xuankang Pan, Karissa N Simon, Rafael J Sierra, Mario Hevesi","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There remains ongoing controversy regarding the optimal treatment strategy of hip dysplasia, with some advocating for the addition of hip arthroscopy to periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to address concomitant labral tears. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical outcomes, complications, and joint preservation of PAO and PAO with hip arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was done, and studies were included if they reported outcomes of PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy, PAO with staged hip arthroscopy, or compared outcomes of PAO alone versus PAO with hip arthroscopy. A meta-analysis was conducted with respect to studies who compared preoperative to postoperative change in modified Harris Hip Score between PAO and PAO with hip arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies were included in this review. Most patients demonstrated preoperative labral pathology. Pooled analysis of the postoperative change in modified Harris Hip Score showed no difference between PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO alone (P = 0.238). Three of six studies comparing both surgical techniques demonstrated a notable postoperative improvement for select outcome scores for the PAO plus hip arthroscopy group but not for the PAO alone group. Of note, no studies demonstrated a notable improvement in the PAO alone group compared with PAO plus hip arthroscopy. The rates of complications and conversion to total hip arthroplasty for both procedures were notably similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Favorable and comparable clinical outcomes were observed for both PAO alone and PAO with hip arthroscopy. Although PAO with hip arthroscopy demonstrated statistically superior clinical outcomes for some measures, it was never inferior to PAO alone. Randomized controlled studies with extended follow-up are needed to better understand the potential difference in long-term outcomes and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty between these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:关于髋关节发育不良的最佳治疗策略一直存在争议,一些人主张在髋关节周围截骨术(PAO)的基础上增加髋关节镜手术,以解决同时存在的唇裂问题。本系统性综述的目的是比较 PAO 和 PAO 与髋关节镜手术的临床效果、并发症和关节保留情况:方法:进行文献检索,如果研究报告了PAO与同时进行的髋关节镜检查、PAO与分期髋关节镜检查的结果,或比较了单纯PAO与PAO与髋关节镜检查的结果,则纳入研究。对于比较 PAO 与 PAO 同时进行髋关节镜检查术前与术后改良 Harris 髋关节评分变化的研究进行了荟萃分析:本综述纳入了 20 项研究。大多数患者术前都有唇囊病变。对术后改良 Harris 髋关节评分变化的汇总分析显示,同时进行髋关节镜检查的 PAO 与单纯 PAO 之间无差异(P = 0.238)。在对两种手术技术进行比较的六项研究中,有三项研究显示 PAO 加髋关节镜手术组的术后部分结果评分有明显改善,而单纯 PAO 组则没有。值得注意的是,没有研究显示单纯 PAO 组与 PAO 加髋关节镜手术组相比有明显改善。两种手术的并发症发生率和转为全髋关节置换术的比例明显相似:结论:单纯髋关节置换术和髋关节置换术加髋关节镜均可观察到良好且相似的临床结果。虽然 PAO 联合髋关节镜在某些指标上显示出统计学上更优越的临床结果,但它从未逊色于单纯 PAO。为了更好地了解这两种手术在长期疗效和转为全髋关节置换术率方面的潜在差异,需要进行长期随访的随机对照研究。
Is Periacetabular Osteotomy With Hip Arthroscopy Superior to Periacetabular Osteotomy Alone? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Introduction: There remains ongoing controversy regarding the optimal treatment strategy of hip dysplasia, with some advocating for the addition of hip arthroscopy to periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to address concomitant labral tears. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical outcomes, complications, and joint preservation of PAO and PAO with hip arthroscopy.
Methods: A literature search was done, and studies were included if they reported outcomes of PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy, PAO with staged hip arthroscopy, or compared outcomes of PAO alone versus PAO with hip arthroscopy. A meta-analysis was conducted with respect to studies who compared preoperative to postoperative change in modified Harris Hip Score between PAO and PAO with hip arthroscopy.
Results: Twenty studies were included in this review. Most patients demonstrated preoperative labral pathology. Pooled analysis of the postoperative change in modified Harris Hip Score showed no difference between PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO alone (P = 0.238). Three of six studies comparing both surgical techniques demonstrated a notable postoperative improvement for select outcome scores for the PAO plus hip arthroscopy group but not for the PAO alone group. Of note, no studies demonstrated a notable improvement in the PAO alone group compared with PAO plus hip arthroscopy. The rates of complications and conversion to total hip arthroplasty for both procedures were notably similar.
Conclusion: Favorable and comparable clinical outcomes were observed for both PAO alone and PAO with hip arthroscopy. Although PAO with hip arthroscopy demonstrated statistically superior clinical outcomes for some measures, it was never inferior to PAO alone. Randomized controlled studies with extended follow-up are needed to better understand the potential difference in long-term outcomes and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty between these procedures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues.
Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.