Thomas DeGraba, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos, Cathaleen Madsen, Aroon Karra, Michael Dinneen
{"title":"军队卫生系统综合实践单元工具。","authors":"Thomas DeGraba, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos, Cathaleen Madsen, Aroon Karra, Michael Dinneen","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a tool for measuring performance of a coordinated care center against the criteria of an integrated practice unit (IPU) and test it against an established care center in the Military Health System (MHS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Characteristics of 4 patient care coordination models were sorted using the 11 criteria of the IPU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subject matter experts evaluated characteristics and criteria for inclusion or exclusion based on the needs of specialty care in the MHS. The consolidated tool was tested using the example of the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), which provides coordinated, colocated care for patients with traumatic brain injury, using responses of yes, partial, no, not applicable, or incomplete.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final tool contained 7 IPU criteria subdivided into 18 measures. NICoE was found in 2020 to meet 11 measures fully and 6 partially, with 1 deemed not applicable. In 2023 it met 17 of 18 measures, with the remaining (translation services) available as an enterprise-wide resource. The tool was seen to need improvement in clarification of 3 measures and in 1 criterion that is evaluated differently by patients vs providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This IPU assessment tool accurately captures both the strengths and weaknesses of a coordinated care facility within the MHS. Iterative refinement of the tool is expected to inform ongoing discussion of the transformation of care in the MHS and the US and to provide a framework by which to measure the care performance of centers wishing to reorganize as IPUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"30 Spec. No. 13","pages":"SP985-SP998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated practice unit tool for the Military Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas DeGraba, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos, Cathaleen Madsen, Aroon Karra, Michael Dinneen\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a tool for measuring performance of a coordinated care center against the criteria of an integrated practice unit (IPU) and test it against an established care center in the Military Health System (MHS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Characteristics of 4 patient care coordination models were sorted using the 11 criteria of the IPU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subject matter experts evaluated characteristics and criteria for inclusion or exclusion based on the needs of specialty care in the MHS. The consolidated tool was tested using the example of the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), which provides coordinated, colocated care for patients with traumatic brain injury, using responses of yes, partial, no, not applicable, or incomplete.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final tool contained 7 IPU criteria subdivided into 18 measures. NICoE was found in 2020 to meet 11 measures fully and 6 partially, with 1 deemed not applicable. In 2023 it met 17 of 18 measures, with the remaining (translation services) available as an enterprise-wide resource. The tool was seen to need improvement in clarification of 3 measures and in 1 criterion that is evaluated differently by patients vs providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This IPU assessment tool accurately captures both the strengths and weaknesses of a coordinated care facility within the MHS. Iterative refinement of the tool is expected to inform ongoing discussion of the transformation of care in the MHS and the US and to provide a framework by which to measure the care performance of centers wishing to reorganize as IPUs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"30 Spec. No. 13\",\"pages\":\"SP985-SP998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An integrated practice unit tool for the Military Health System.
Objectives: To develop a tool for measuring performance of a coordinated care center against the criteria of an integrated practice unit (IPU) and test it against an established care center in the Military Health System (MHS).
Study design: Characteristics of 4 patient care coordination models were sorted using the 11 criteria of the IPU.
Methods: Subject matter experts evaluated characteristics and criteria for inclusion or exclusion based on the needs of specialty care in the MHS. The consolidated tool was tested using the example of the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), which provides coordinated, colocated care for patients with traumatic brain injury, using responses of yes, partial, no, not applicable, or incomplete.
Results: The final tool contained 7 IPU criteria subdivided into 18 measures. NICoE was found in 2020 to meet 11 measures fully and 6 partially, with 1 deemed not applicable. In 2023 it met 17 of 18 measures, with the remaining (translation services) available as an enterprise-wide resource. The tool was seen to need improvement in clarification of 3 measures and in 1 criterion that is evaluated differently by patients vs providers.
Conclusions: This IPU assessment tool accurately captures both the strengths and weaknesses of a coordinated care facility within the MHS. Iterative refinement of the tool is expected to inform ongoing discussion of the transformation of care in the MHS and the US and to provide a framework by which to measure the care performance of centers wishing to reorganize as IPUs.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.