军队卫生系统综合实践单元工具。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648
Thomas DeGraba, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos, Cathaleen Madsen, Aroon Karra, Michael Dinneen
{"title":"军队卫生系统综合实践单元工具。","authors":"Thomas DeGraba, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos, Cathaleen Madsen, Aroon Karra, Michael Dinneen","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a tool for measuring performance of a coordinated care center against the criteria of an integrated practice unit (IPU) and test it against an established care center in the Military Health System (MHS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Characteristics of 4 patient care coordination models were sorted using the 11 criteria of the IPU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subject matter experts evaluated characteristics and criteria for inclusion or exclusion based on the needs of specialty care in the MHS. The consolidated tool was tested using the example of the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), which provides coordinated, colocated care for patients with traumatic brain injury, using responses of yes, partial, no, not applicable, or incomplete.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final tool contained 7 IPU criteria subdivided into 18 measures. NICoE was found in 2020 to meet 11 measures fully and 6 partially, with 1 deemed not applicable. In 2023 it met 17 of 18 measures, with the remaining (translation services) available as an enterprise-wide resource. The tool was seen to need improvement in clarification of 3 measures and in 1 criterion that is evaluated differently by patients vs providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This IPU assessment tool accurately captures both the strengths and weaknesses of a coordinated care facility within the MHS. Iterative refinement of the tool is expected to inform ongoing discussion of the transformation of care in the MHS and the US and to provide a framework by which to measure the care performance of centers wishing to reorganize as IPUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"30 Spec. No. 13","pages":"SP985-SP998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated practice unit tool for the Military Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas DeGraba, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos, Cathaleen Madsen, Aroon Karra, Michael Dinneen\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a tool for measuring performance of a coordinated care center against the criteria of an integrated practice unit (IPU) and test it against an established care center in the Military Health System (MHS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Characteristics of 4 patient care coordination models were sorted using the 11 criteria of the IPU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subject matter experts evaluated characteristics and criteria for inclusion or exclusion based on the needs of specialty care in the MHS. The consolidated tool was tested using the example of the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), which provides coordinated, colocated care for patients with traumatic brain injury, using responses of yes, partial, no, not applicable, or incomplete.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final tool contained 7 IPU criteria subdivided into 18 measures. NICoE was found in 2020 to meet 11 measures fully and 6 partially, with 1 deemed not applicable. In 2023 it met 17 of 18 measures, with the remaining (translation services) available as an enterprise-wide resource. The tool was seen to need improvement in clarification of 3 measures and in 1 criterion that is evaluated differently by patients vs providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This IPU assessment tool accurately captures both the strengths and weaknesses of a coordinated care facility within the MHS. Iterative refinement of the tool is expected to inform ongoing discussion of the transformation of care in the MHS and the US and to provide a framework by which to measure the care performance of centers wishing to reorganize as IPUs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":\"30 Spec. No. 13\",\"pages\":\"SP985-SP998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:根据综合实践单位(IPU)的标准,开发一种衡量协调护理中心绩效的工具,并与军事医疗系统(MHS)的一个成熟护理中心进行对比测试:根据综合实践单位(IPU)的标准开发一种衡量协调护理中心绩效的工具,并与军事卫生系统(MHS)的一个成熟护理中心进行对比测试:研究设计:使用 IPU 的 11 项标准对 4 种患者护理协调模式的特征进行分类:方法:主题专家根据军事医疗系统专科护理的需求,评估了纳入或排除的特征和标准。综合工具以国家无畏号卓越中心(NICoE)为例进行了测试,该中心为脑外伤患者提供协调的同地医疗服务,测试中使用了 "是"、"部分"、"否"、"不适用 "或 "不完整 "等回答:最终工具包含 7 项 IPU 标准,细分为 18 项措施。2020 年,NICoE 完全符合 11 项标准,部分符合 6 项标准,1 项标准被视为不适用。2023 年,它达到了 18 项措施中的 17 项,其余一项(翻译服务)可作为全企业资源使用。该工具在澄清 3 项衡量标准和 1 项由患者和医疗服务提供者进行不同评价的标准方面有待改进:这个 IPU 评估工具准确地捕捉到了医疗服务体系中协调护理机构的优势和劣势。对该工具的反复改进有望为正在进行的有关医疗服务改革的讨论提供信息,并为希望重组为 IPU 的中心提供一个衡量医疗服务绩效的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An integrated practice unit tool for the Military Health System.

Objectives: To develop a tool for measuring performance of a coordinated care center against the criteria of an integrated practice unit (IPU) and test it against an established care center in the Military Health System (MHS).

Study design: Characteristics of 4 patient care coordination models were sorted using the 11 criteria of the IPU.

Methods: Subject matter experts evaluated characteristics and criteria for inclusion or exclusion based on the needs of specialty care in the MHS. The consolidated tool was tested using the example of the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE), which provides coordinated, colocated care for patients with traumatic brain injury, using responses of yes, partial, no, not applicable, or incomplete.

Results: The final tool contained 7 IPU criteria subdivided into 18 measures. NICoE was found in 2020 to meet 11 measures fully and 6 partially, with 1 deemed not applicable. In 2023 it met 17 of 18 measures, with the remaining (translation services) available as an enterprise-wide resource. The tool was seen to need improvement in clarification of 3 measures and in 1 criterion that is evaluated differently by patients vs providers.

Conclusions: This IPU assessment tool accurately captures both the strengths and weaknesses of a coordinated care facility within the MHS. Iterative refinement of the tool is expected to inform ongoing discussion of the transformation of care in the MHS and the US and to provide a framework by which to measure the care performance of centers wishing to reorganize as IPUs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Association between screening for suspected COVID-19 cases and outcomes of patients revisiting the emergency department. Cancellations in primary care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Collaboration to transition members to preferred formulary dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor. Effects of individualized nurse-led care plans on olaparib treatment duration. High-intensity home-based rehabilitation in a Medicare accountable care organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1