老年卵巢癌患者使用奥拉帕利加贝伐单抗维持治疗的安全性和生活质量:PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 的亚组分析。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Oncologist Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae322
Coline Montégut, Claire Falandry, Saverio Cinieri, Claire Cropet, Laure Montane, Frédérique Rousseau, Florence Joly, Malak Moubarak, Anna M Mosconi, Eva M Guerra-Alía, Christian Schauer, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Ignace Vergote, Gabriella Parma, Gabriel Lindahl, Amélie Anota, Ulrich Canzler, Frederik Marmé, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Renaud Sabatier
{"title":"老年卵巢癌患者使用奥拉帕利加贝伐单抗维持治疗的安全性和生活质量:PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 的亚组分析。","authors":"Coline Montégut, Claire Falandry, Saverio Cinieri, Claire Cropet, Laure Montane, Frédérique Rousseau, Florence Joly, Malak Moubarak, Anna M Mosconi, Eva M Guerra-Alía, Christian Schauer, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Ignace Vergote, Gabriella Parma, Gabriel Lindahl, Amélie Anota, Ulrich Canzler, Frederik Marmé, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Renaud Sabatier","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs <70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, -0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [-0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and quality of life with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients with ovarian cancer: subgroup analysis of PAOLA‑1/ENGOT-ov25.\",\"authors\":\"Coline Montégut, Claire Falandry, Saverio Cinieri, Claire Cropet, Laure Montane, Frédérique Rousseau, Florence Joly, Malak Moubarak, Anna M Mosconi, Eva M Guerra-Alía, Christian Schauer, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Ignace Vergote, Gabriella Parma, Gabriel Lindahl, Amélie Anota, Ulrich Canzler, Frederik Marmé, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Renaud Sabatier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyae322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs <70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, -0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [-0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae322\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25中,在贝伐单抗维持治疗中加入奥拉帕尼可提高新诊断的晚期卵巢癌患者的总生存期。我们描述了PAOLA-1中老年患者的安全性和生活质量(QoL)。方法:收集安全性(CTCAE v4.03)和生活质量(EORTC生活质量问卷Core 30和Ovarian 28)数据。我们比较了年龄(≥70岁)和结果:在随机分配的806例患者中,142例年龄≥70岁(含奥拉帕尼组:n = 104;安慰剂组:n = 38)。老年患者接受奥拉帕尼治疗的安全性与年轻患者相似,除了所有级别淋巴细胞减少和≥3级高血压的发生率更高(31.7% vs 21.6%, P =。032和26.9% vs 16.7%, P =。019年,分别)。无血液学恶性肿瘤报告。随机化两年后,奥拉帕尼组的平均全球健康状况和认知功能似乎比单独使用贝伐单抗组更好(调整后的平均差异分别为+4.47点[95% CI, -0.49至9.42]和+4.82点[-0.57至10.21]),两组之间的其他生活质量项目相似。在含奥拉帕尼组中,基线GVS≥1的老年患者(n = 48)比GVS为0的患者(n = 34)表现出更高的毒性和更差的生活质量。结论:在PAOLA-1的老年患者中,奥拉帕尼联合贝伐单抗具有可控的安全性,对生活质量无不良影响。需要更多的数据来在更多的易感患者中证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and quality of life with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients with ovarian cancer: subgroup analysis of PAOLA‑1/ENGOT-ov25.

Background: In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1.

Methods: Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs <70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered.

Results: Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, -0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [-0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34).

Conclusion: Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
期刊最新文献
Updated overall survival in patients with prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the phase III TIVO-3 study. The pathologic and genomic evolution of primary malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective cohort study and case-control genomic analysis. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors Show Activity in Colorectal Cancer With ALK Rearrangements: Case Series and Literature Review. Primary Resistance to RET Inhibition in a RET Fusion-Positive Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Association of opioid use with survival in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: it is time for evidence-based behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1