M. V. Dubovichenko, V. Nnanyereugo, G. A. Bobkov, A. A. ElDeeb, D. M. Kolpashchikov
{"title":"比较反义寡核苷酸、DNA 酶及其双价形式在 RNAse H 依赖性裂解折叠 RNA 中的作用","authors":"M. V. Dubovichenko, V. Nnanyereugo, G. A. Bobkov, A. A. ElDeeb, D. M. Kolpashchikov","doi":"10.1134/S1068162024060219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) and DNAzyme (Dz) agents have been suggested for suppression specific mRNA <i>in vivo</i>. It was reported that Dz agents are more selective in recognition their targets than ASO. However, Dz failed to produce therapeutically significant drugs due to their low efficiency. Here we compared the performance of the two types of agents in cleavage a folded RNA fragment in reconstituted system containing RNase H. <b>Methods:</b> Thermodynamic parameters and predicted 2D-structure of the RNA fragments were obtained using RNAFold application in UNAFold web server. To perform the experiments with RNA cleavage by enzymes we used commercial Mg<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup>-containing reaction 10X RNAse H Buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 150 mM DTT, 1 M KCl, 45 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>). Results of RNA cleavage were visualized with 20% denaturing PAGE (AA : BA (29 : 1), 7 M Urea, 1× TBE) running 150 min at 80 V. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> Individual ASO agents were ~3–6 times more active in RNA cleaving than the equivalent Dz agents. Both agents demonstrated low selectivity toward RNA cleavage. Combining two Dz complementary to the abutting position of the RNA target bivalent (BDD) agent improved RNA cleavage to the level of the most active ASO agent. <b>Conclusions:</b> Comparing the obtained data with published earlier for RNase H—free system suggests that RNase H stabilizes the Dz:RNA complex and reduces its selectivity but significantly increase RNA cleavage efficiency. The contribution of RNase H effects on the performance of Dz agents in cell culture and <i>in vivo</i> should be taken in account.</p>","PeriodicalId":758,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry","volume":"50 6","pages":"2558 - 2566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Antisense Oligonucleotides, DNAzymes, and Their Bivalent Forms in RNAse H Dependent Cleavage of Folded RNA\",\"authors\":\"M. V. Dubovichenko, V. Nnanyereugo, G. A. Bobkov, A. A. ElDeeb, D. M. Kolpashchikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1068162024060219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Objective:</b> Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) and DNAzyme (Dz) agents have been suggested for suppression specific mRNA <i>in vivo</i>. It was reported that Dz agents are more selective in recognition their targets than ASO. However, Dz failed to produce therapeutically significant drugs due to their low efficiency. Here we compared the performance of the two types of agents in cleavage a folded RNA fragment in reconstituted system containing RNase H. <b>Methods:</b> Thermodynamic parameters and predicted 2D-structure of the RNA fragments were obtained using RNAFold application in UNAFold web server. To perform the experiments with RNA cleavage by enzymes we used commercial Mg<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup>-containing reaction 10X RNAse H Buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 150 mM DTT, 1 M KCl, 45 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>). Results of RNA cleavage were visualized with 20% denaturing PAGE (AA : BA (29 : 1), 7 M Urea, 1× TBE) running 150 min at 80 V. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> Individual ASO agents were ~3–6 times more active in RNA cleaving than the equivalent Dz agents. Both agents demonstrated low selectivity toward RNA cleavage. Combining two Dz complementary to the abutting position of the RNA target bivalent (BDD) agent improved RNA cleavage to the level of the most active ASO agent. <b>Conclusions:</b> Comparing the obtained data with published earlier for RNase H—free system suggests that RNase H stabilizes the Dz:RNA complex and reduces its selectivity but significantly increase RNA cleavage efficiency. The contribution of RNase H effects on the performance of Dz agents in cell culture and <i>in vivo</i> should be taken in account.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"2558 - 2566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1068162024060219\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1068162024060219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究反义寡核苷酸(ASO)和DNAzyme (Dz)在体内抑制特异性mRNA的作用。据报道,Dz制剂在识别目标方面比ASO具有更强的选择性。然而,由于效率低,Dz未能生产出具有治疗意义的药物。本文比较了两种试剂在含RNase h的重构体系中切割折叠RNA片段的性能。方法:在UNAFold web服务器上使用RNAFold应用程序获得RNA片段的热力学参数和预测的二维结构。为了进行酶裂解RNA的实验,我们使用含Mg2+的商业反应10X RNAse H缓冲液(200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 150 mM DTT, 1 M KCl, 45 mM MgCl2)。用20%变性的PAGE (AA: BA (29: 1), 7 M尿素,1× TBE)在80 V下运行150 min,观察RNA裂解结果。结果和讨论:单个ASO药物的RNA切割活性是等效Dz药物的3 - 6倍。这两种试剂对RNA切割的选择性都很低。将两个互补的Dz结合到RNA靶二价(BDD)剂的邻近位置,将RNA切割提高到最活跃的ASO剂的水平。结论:将获得的数据与先前发表的RNase H - free系统的数据进行比较,表明RNase H稳定了Dz:RNA复合物,降低了其选择性,但显著提高了RNA切割效率。应考虑RNase H对Dz制剂在细胞培养和体内性能的影响。
Comparison of Antisense Oligonucleotides, DNAzymes, and Their Bivalent Forms in RNAse H Dependent Cleavage of Folded RNA
Objective: Antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) and DNAzyme (Dz) agents have been suggested for suppression specific mRNA in vivo. It was reported that Dz agents are more selective in recognition their targets than ASO. However, Dz failed to produce therapeutically significant drugs due to their low efficiency. Here we compared the performance of the two types of agents in cleavage a folded RNA fragment in reconstituted system containing RNase H. Methods: Thermodynamic parameters and predicted 2D-structure of the RNA fragments were obtained using RNAFold application in UNAFold web server. To perform the experiments with RNA cleavage by enzymes we used commercial Mg2+-containing reaction 10X RNAse H Buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 150 mM DTT, 1 M KCl, 45 mM MgCl2). Results of RNA cleavage were visualized with 20% denaturing PAGE (AA : BA (29 : 1), 7 M Urea, 1× TBE) running 150 min at 80 V. Results and Discussion: Individual ASO agents were ~3–6 times more active in RNA cleaving than the equivalent Dz agents. Both agents demonstrated low selectivity toward RNA cleavage. Combining two Dz complementary to the abutting position of the RNA target bivalent (BDD) agent improved RNA cleavage to the level of the most active ASO agent. Conclusions: Comparing the obtained data with published earlier for RNase H—free system suggests that RNase H stabilizes the Dz:RNA complex and reduces its selectivity but significantly increase RNA cleavage efficiency. The contribution of RNase H effects on the performance of Dz agents in cell culture and in vivo should be taken in account.
期刊介绍:
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry publishes reviews and original experimental and theoretical studies on the structure, function, structure–activity relationships, and synthesis of biopolymers, such as proteins, nucleic acids, polysaccharides, mixed biopolymers, and their complexes, and low-molecular-weight biologically active compounds (peptides, sugars, lipids, antibiotics, etc.). The journal also covers selected aspects of neuro- and immunochemistry, biotechnology, and ecology.