迷走神经刺激在中风中的叙事回顾。

IF 2.8 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795735241303069
Yanhong Hu, Ruiqi Xiong, Suyue Pan, Kaibin Huang
{"title":"迷走神经刺激在中风中的叙事回顾。","authors":"Yanhong Hu, Ruiqi Xiong, Suyue Pan, Kaibin Huang","doi":"10.1177/11795735241303069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke is a significant health concern impacting society and the health care system. Reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke and standard rehabilitative therapies may not always be effective at improving post-stroke neurological function, and developing alternative strategies is particularly important. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a treatment option currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for intractable epilepsy, refractory depression, primary headache disorders, obesity, and moderate to severe upper-limb motor dysfunction in chronic ischemic stroke patients. Moreover, VNS has demonstrated potential efficacy in various conditions, including autoimmune diseases, disorders of consciousness, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, stroke, and other diseases. Although the popularity and application of VNS continue to increase rapidly, the field generally lacks a consensus on the optimal stimulation parameters. The stimulation parameters for VNS are directly related to the clinical outcome, and determining the optimal stimulation conditions for VNS has become an essential concern in its clinical application. This review summarizes the current evidence on VNS for stroke in preclinical models and clinical trials in humans, paying attention to the current types and stimulation parameters of VNS, highlighting the mechanistic pathways involved in the beneficial effects of VNS, critically evaluating clinical implementation challenges and proposing some suggestions for its future research directions. Achieving safe and effective clinical transformation of VNS requires further animal and clinical studies to determine the optimal stimulation parameters and therapeutic mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":"16 ","pages":"11795735241303069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A narrative review of vagus nerve stimulation in stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Yanhong Hu, Ruiqi Xiong, Suyue Pan, Kaibin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795735241303069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stroke is a significant health concern impacting society and the health care system. Reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke and standard rehabilitative therapies may not always be effective at improving post-stroke neurological function, and developing alternative strategies is particularly important. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a treatment option currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for intractable epilepsy, refractory depression, primary headache disorders, obesity, and moderate to severe upper-limb motor dysfunction in chronic ischemic stroke patients. Moreover, VNS has demonstrated potential efficacy in various conditions, including autoimmune diseases, disorders of consciousness, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, stroke, and other diseases. Although the popularity and application of VNS continue to increase rapidly, the field generally lacks a consensus on the optimal stimulation parameters. The stimulation parameters for VNS are directly related to the clinical outcome, and determining the optimal stimulation conditions for VNS has become an essential concern in its clinical application. This review summarizes the current evidence on VNS for stroke in preclinical models and clinical trials in humans, paying attention to the current types and stimulation parameters of VNS, highlighting the mechanistic pathways involved in the beneficial effects of VNS, critically evaluating clinical implementation challenges and proposing some suggestions for its future research directions. Achieving safe and effective clinical transformation of VNS requires further animal and clinical studies to determine the optimal stimulation parameters and therapeutic mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"11795735241303069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735241303069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735241303069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中风是影响社会和卫生保健系统的重大健康问题。急性缺血性脑卒中的再灌注治疗和标准康复治疗可能并不总是有效地改善脑卒中后神经功能,制定替代策略尤为重要。迷走神经刺激(VNS)是美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)目前批准的一种治疗方案,用于治疗慢性缺血性卒中患者的难治性癫痫、难治性抑郁、原发性头痛疾病、肥胖和中重度上肢运动功能障碍。此外,VNS已被证明对多种疾病有潜在疗效,包括自身免疫性疾病、意识障碍、阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病、创伤性脑损伤、中风和其他疾病。尽管VNS的普及和应用持续快速增长,但该领域普遍缺乏对最佳增产参数的共识。VNS的刺激参数直接关系到临床疗效,确定VNS的最佳刺激条件已成为其临床应用中必须关注的问题。本文综述了目前VNS治疗脑卒中的临床前模型和人体临床试验的证据,重点介绍了VNS的类型和刺激参数,重点介绍了VNS有益作用的机制途径,批判性地评价了VNS临床实施面临的挑战,并对其未来的研究方向提出了一些建议。实现安全有效的VNS临床转化需要进一步的动物和临床研究来确定最佳刺激参数和治疗机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A narrative review of vagus nerve stimulation in stroke.

Stroke is a significant health concern impacting society and the health care system. Reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke and standard rehabilitative therapies may not always be effective at improving post-stroke neurological function, and developing alternative strategies is particularly important. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a treatment option currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for intractable epilepsy, refractory depression, primary headache disorders, obesity, and moderate to severe upper-limb motor dysfunction in chronic ischemic stroke patients. Moreover, VNS has demonstrated potential efficacy in various conditions, including autoimmune diseases, disorders of consciousness, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, stroke, and other diseases. Although the popularity and application of VNS continue to increase rapidly, the field generally lacks a consensus on the optimal stimulation parameters. The stimulation parameters for VNS are directly related to the clinical outcome, and determining the optimal stimulation conditions for VNS has become an essential concern in its clinical application. This review summarizes the current evidence on VNS for stroke in preclinical models and clinical trials in humans, paying attention to the current types and stimulation parameters of VNS, highlighting the mechanistic pathways involved in the beneficial effects of VNS, critically evaluating clinical implementation challenges and proposing some suggestions for its future research directions. Achieving safe and effective clinical transformation of VNS requires further animal and clinical studies to determine the optimal stimulation parameters and therapeutic mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multiple Sclerosis in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A - A Case Report and Literature Review. Co-Existing Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type II and Parkinson's Disease Linked to a Novel DNAjB2 Pathogenic Variant. Modulation of EEG Background Rhythms in Sturge-Weber Syndrome: Impact of Surgical Timing on the Unaffected Hemisphere. Assessing the Association of the Dietary Inflammatory Index With Stroke Risk and All-Cause Mortality Among Hypertension Patients: A NHANES Cross-Sectional Study (2005-2018). Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Therapy Versus Best Medical Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1