难治性脓毒性休克的早期大剂量血管加压药:一项队列研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of critical care Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155004
Hailey A. Thompson , Hannah M. Brinkman , Kianoush B. Kashani , Kristin C. Cole , Erica D. Wittwer , Patrick M. Wieruszewski
{"title":"难治性脓毒性休克的早期大剂量血管加压药:一项队列研究。","authors":"Hailey A. Thompson ,&nbsp;Hannah M. Brinkman ,&nbsp;Kianoush B. Kashani ,&nbsp;Kristin C. Cole ,&nbsp;Erica D. Wittwer ,&nbsp;Patrick M. Wieruszewski","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into ‘early’ and ‘late’ groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (<em>n</em> = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58–0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17–1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 155004"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early high-dose vasopressors in refractory septic shock: A cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Hailey A. Thompson ,&nbsp;Hannah M. Brinkman ,&nbsp;Kianoush B. Kashani ,&nbsp;Kristin C. Cole ,&nbsp;Erica D. Wittwer ,&nbsp;Patrick M. Wieruszewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into ‘early’ and ‘late’ groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (<em>n</em> = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58–0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17–1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 155004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088394412400491X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088394412400491X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大剂量血管加压药难治性脓毒性休克会导致不可接受的高死亡率,但血管加压药剂量达到峰值的时间对预后的影响尚不清楚:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在脓毒性休克最初 24 小时内需要血管加压药剂量≥0.5 μg/kg/min 去甲肾上腺素当量的成年人。我们使用血管加压药剂量达到峰值的中位时间将患者分为 "早期 "和 "晚期 "两组。采用多变量考克斯比例危险回归评估血管加压药剂量达到峰值的时间对死亡率的影响:血管加压药剂量达到峰值的中位时间为6(3,13)小时,分为早期组(351人)和晚期组(351人)。在严重程度调整后的多变量分析中,早期组在 28 天内死亡的可能性较低(HR 0.76,95 % CI 0.58-0.99)。早期组的存活天数明显更多,且无需接受肾脏替代治疗、血管加压、机械通气,并能更快地脱离血管加压(HR 1.40,95 % CI 1.17-1.69)。肠系膜缺血和心律失常在晚期组更为常见:结论:在血管加压药难治性脓毒性休克患者中,在休克发生后六小时内达到血管加压药峰值与死亡率降低、存活天数增加以及无需器官支持疗法有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early high-dose vasopressors in refractory septic shock: A cohort study

Purpose

Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into ‘early’ and ‘late’ groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.

Results

The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (n = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58–0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17–1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.

Conclusions

In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
期刊最新文献
What every intensivist should know about ciprofol Emergency critical care - life-saving critical care before ICU admission: A consensus statement of a Group of European Experts Electrical impedance tomography to set high pressure in time-controlled adaptive ventilation Editorial Board Target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients and its association with 28-day mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1