Hailey A. Thompson , Hannah M. Brinkman , Kianoush B. Kashani , Kristin C. Cole , Erica D. Wittwer , Patrick M. Wieruszewski
{"title":"难治性脓毒性休克的早期大剂量血管加压药:一项队列研究。","authors":"Hailey A. Thompson , Hannah M. Brinkman , Kianoush B. Kashani , Kristin C. Cole , Erica D. Wittwer , Patrick M. Wieruszewski","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into ‘early’ and ‘late’ groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (<em>n</em> = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58–0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17–1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 155004"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early high-dose vasopressors in refractory septic shock: A cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Hailey A. Thompson , Hannah M. Brinkman , Kianoush B. Kashani , Kristin C. Cole , Erica D. Wittwer , Patrick M. Wieruszewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.155004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into ‘early’ and ‘late’ groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (<em>n</em> = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58–0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17–1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 155004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088394412400491X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088394412400491X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:大剂量血管加压药难治性脓毒性休克会导致不可接受的高死亡率,但血管加压药剂量达到峰值的时间对预后的影响尚不清楚:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在脓毒性休克最初 24 小时内需要血管加压药剂量≥0.5 μg/kg/min 去甲肾上腺素当量的成年人。我们使用血管加压药剂量达到峰值的中位时间将患者分为 "早期 "和 "晚期 "两组。采用多变量考克斯比例危险回归评估血管加压药剂量达到峰值的时间对死亡率的影响:血管加压药剂量达到峰值的中位时间为6(3,13)小时,分为早期组(351人)和晚期组(351人)。在严重程度调整后的多变量分析中,早期组在 28 天内死亡的可能性较低(HR 0.76,95 % CI 0.58-0.99)。早期组的存活天数明显更多,且无需接受肾脏替代治疗、血管加压、机械通气,并能更快地脱离血管加压(HR 1.40,95 % CI 1.17-1.69)。肠系膜缺血和心律失常在晚期组更为常见:结论:在血管加压药难治性脓毒性休克患者中,在休克发生后六小时内达到血管加压药峰值与死亡率降低、存活天数增加以及无需器官支持疗法有关。
Early high-dose vasopressors in refractory septic shock: A cohort study
Purpose
Septic shock refractory to high-dose vasopressors confers unacceptably high mortality, however, the impact of timing of peak vasopressor dose exposure on outcomes is unknown.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included adults who required a vasopressor dose ≥0.5 μg/kg/min norepinephrine-equivalents in the first 24 h of septic shock. We used the median time to peak vasopressor dose to stratify patients into ‘early’ and ‘late’ groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of time to peak vasopressor exposure on mortality.
Results
The median time to peak vasopressor dose exposure was 6 (3,13) hours, defining the early (n = 351) and late (n = 351) groups. In the severity-adjusted multivariable analysis, the early group was less likely to die within 28 days (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.58–0.99). The early group experienced significantly more days alive and free from renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, and quicker independence from vasopressors (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.17–1.69). Mesenteric ischemia and arrhythmias were more frequent in the late group.
Conclusions
In vasopressor-refractory septic shock, achieving the peak vasopressor dose within the first six hours of shock onset was associated with reduced mortality and more days alive and free from organ-support therapies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.