Meizhu Jiang, Yanan Xu, Li Yang, Yilong Yan, Han Zhou, Wanqing Song, Xinyue Wang, Haiyang Sun, Xuetong Yao, Zhigang Zhao, Cao Li
{"title":"神经外科预防使用抗癫痫药物(asm)的循证建议:指南的系统回顾。","authors":"Meizhu Jiang, Yanan Xu, Li Yang, Yilong Yan, Han Zhou, Wanqing Song, Xinyue Wang, Haiyang Sun, Xuetong Yao, Zhigang Zhao, Cao Li","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12764-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the methodological quality of guidelines concerning the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery and to summarize relevant recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), and other guideline repositories and official organizations were searched from 2004 to 2023 (20 years). The extracted information consisted of the guideline characteristics, relevant recommendations, levels of evidence, and strength of recommendations. Using the Guideline Research and Evaluation Tool II (AGREE II), five reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is used to assess the inter-reviewer consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 27 eligible guidelines, AGREE II scores varied with higher scores in Clarity of Presentation (88.89%), Scope and Purpose (83.33%), and Editorial Independence (72.92%), but lower in Rigor of Development (59.17%), Stakeholder Involvement (46.67%), and Applicability (41.67%). ICC ranged from 0.51 to 0.92. Nine guidelines were recommended, eight with modifications, and ten not recommended. ASMs prophylaxis are recommended for patients with a seizure history, which means secondary prophylaxis, and specific high-risk groups, but not recommended for primary prophylaxis routinely for those without a history of seizure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guidelines in neurosurgical perioperative prophylactic use of ASMs are of moderate quality with domains for enhancement. Guidelines lack detailed guidance on medication initiation, dosage, and duration, highlighting the need for more high-quality clinical trials comparing newer and classical ASMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based recommendations for the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery: a systematic review of guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Meizhu Jiang, Yanan Xu, Li Yang, Yilong Yan, Han Zhou, Wanqing Song, Xinyue Wang, Haiyang Sun, Xuetong Yao, Zhigang Zhao, Cao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-024-12764-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the methodological quality of guidelines concerning the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery and to summarize relevant recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), and other guideline repositories and official organizations were searched from 2004 to 2023 (20 years). The extracted information consisted of the guideline characteristics, relevant recommendations, levels of evidence, and strength of recommendations. Using the Guideline Research and Evaluation Tool II (AGREE II), five reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is used to assess the inter-reviewer consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 27 eligible guidelines, AGREE II scores varied with higher scores in Clarity of Presentation (88.89%), Scope and Purpose (83.33%), and Editorial Independence (72.92%), but lower in Rigor of Development (59.17%), Stakeholder Involvement (46.67%), and Applicability (41.67%). ICC ranged from 0.51 to 0.92. Nine guidelines were recommended, eight with modifications, and ten not recommended. ASMs prophylaxis are recommended for patients with a seizure history, which means secondary prophylaxis, and specific high-risk groups, but not recommended for primary prophylaxis routinely for those without a history of seizure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guidelines in neurosurgical perioperative prophylactic use of ASMs are of moderate quality with domains for enhancement. Guidelines lack detailed guidance on medication initiation, dosage, and duration, highlighting the need for more high-quality clinical trials comparing newer and classical ASMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12764-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12764-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究旨在评估神经外科预防性使用抗癫痫药物(ASMs)指南的方法学质量,并总结相关建议:方法:检索了PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)、国家指南交换中心(NGC)、指南国际网络(GIN)以及其他指南库和官方组织,检索期从2004年至2023年(20年)。提取的信息包括指南特征、相关建议、证据等级和建议强度。五位评审员使用指南研究与评估工具 II(AGREE II)评估指南的方法学质量,并使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估评审员之间的一致性:在 27 份符合条件的指南中,AGREE II 的得分各不相同,在表述清晰度(88.89%)、范围和目的(83.33%)以及编辑独立性(72.92%)方面得分较高,但在开发严谨性(59.17%)、利益相关者参与(46.67%)和适用性(41.67%)方面得分较低。ICC 在 0.51 至 0.92 之间。九份指南被推荐,八份指南被修改,十份指南未被推荐。建议对有癫痫发作史的患者(即二级预防)和特定高危人群进行 ASMs 预防,但不建议对无癫痫发作史的患者常规进行一级预防:神经外科围手术期预防性使用 ASMs 的指南质量中等,有需要改进的地方。指南缺乏关于用药起始、剂量和持续时间的详细指导,因此需要进行更多高质量的临床试验,对新型和传统 ASMs 进行比较。
Evidence-based recommendations for the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery: a systematic review of guidelines.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the methodological quality of guidelines concerning the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery and to summarize relevant recommendations.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), and other guideline repositories and official organizations were searched from 2004 to 2023 (20 years). The extracted information consisted of the guideline characteristics, relevant recommendations, levels of evidence, and strength of recommendations. Using the Guideline Research and Evaluation Tool II (AGREE II), five reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is used to assess the inter-reviewer consistency.
Results: Of 27 eligible guidelines, AGREE II scores varied with higher scores in Clarity of Presentation (88.89%), Scope and Purpose (83.33%), and Editorial Independence (72.92%), but lower in Rigor of Development (59.17%), Stakeholder Involvement (46.67%), and Applicability (41.67%). ICC ranged from 0.51 to 0.92. Nine guidelines were recommended, eight with modifications, and ten not recommended. ASMs prophylaxis are recommended for patients with a seizure history, which means secondary prophylaxis, and specific high-risk groups, but not recommended for primary prophylaxis routinely for those without a history of seizure.
Conclusions: Guidelines in neurosurgical perioperative prophylactic use of ASMs are of moderate quality with domains for enhancement. Guidelines lack detailed guidance on medication initiation, dosage, and duration, highlighting the need for more high-quality clinical trials comparing newer and classical ASMs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.