Yoav D Piura, Nick Corriveau-Lecavalier, Abd Moain Abu Dabrh, Michael D Geschwind, Tara J Brigham, Gregory S Day
{"title":"超快速进行性痴呆的识别和诊断:来自前瞻性队列研究和系统文献综述的证据。","authors":"Yoav D Piura, Nick Corriveau-Lecavalier, Abd Moain Abu Dabrh, Michael D Geschwind, Tara J Brigham, Gregory S Day","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12845-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The term rapid progressive dementia (RPD) may be applied to patients who develop dementia within 1 year or complete incapacitation within 2 years of the first symptom of impairment. However, in select cases, cognitive impairment may emerge abruptly, with symptoms evolving across hours or days. We sought to determine the frequency, etiologies, and factors that associated with ultra-RPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ultra-RPD was defined as persistent dementia (global Clinical Dementia Rating<sup>®</sup> ≥ 1), developing within 7 days of initial symptoms. Patients with ultra-RPD were identified via case review of patients enrolled in a prospective study of RPD at two tertiary care centers (February 2016-September 2023) followed by a systematic review of multiple English-language databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (completed January 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three of 188 patients with RPD enrolled in our prospective series met the proposed definition for ultra-RPD (frequency = 1.6%). Systematic review yielded 57 additional cases from 47 publications (60 total cases). Ultra-RPD was attributed to vascular (40%), toxic/metabolic (22%), autoimmune/inflammatory (20%), and iatrogenic/structural (12%) causes. Lesions within the Papez circuit were detected in 52/59 (88%) of patients on neuroimaging. Twelve patients (20%) had potentially treatable causes of ultra-RPD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with ultra-RPD were rarely encountered in our prospective series, representing < 2% of cases of RPD, and rarely reported in the extant literature. The evaluation of patients with ultra-RPD should prioritize testing for vascular, toxic/metabolic, and autoimmune/inflammatory conditions that affect neuroanatomical structures or networks critical for memory formation and retrieval.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification and diagnosis of ultra-rapid progressive dementia: evidence from a prospective cohort study and systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Yoav D Piura, Nick Corriveau-Lecavalier, Abd Moain Abu Dabrh, Michael D Geschwind, Tara J Brigham, Gregory S Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-024-12845-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The term rapid progressive dementia (RPD) may be applied to patients who develop dementia within 1 year or complete incapacitation within 2 years of the first symptom of impairment. However, in select cases, cognitive impairment may emerge abruptly, with symptoms evolving across hours or days. We sought to determine the frequency, etiologies, and factors that associated with ultra-RPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ultra-RPD was defined as persistent dementia (global Clinical Dementia Rating<sup>®</sup> ≥ 1), developing within 7 days of initial symptoms. Patients with ultra-RPD were identified via case review of patients enrolled in a prospective study of RPD at two tertiary care centers (February 2016-September 2023) followed by a systematic review of multiple English-language databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (completed January 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three of 188 patients with RPD enrolled in our prospective series met the proposed definition for ultra-RPD (frequency = 1.6%). Systematic review yielded 57 additional cases from 47 publications (60 total cases). Ultra-RPD was attributed to vascular (40%), toxic/metabolic (22%), autoimmune/inflammatory (20%), and iatrogenic/structural (12%) causes. Lesions within the Papez circuit were detected in 52/59 (88%) of patients on neuroimaging. Twelve patients (20%) had potentially treatable causes of ultra-RPD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with ultra-RPD were rarely encountered in our prospective series, representing < 2% of cases of RPD, and rarely reported in the extant literature. The evaluation of patients with ultra-RPD should prioritize testing for vascular, toxic/metabolic, and autoimmune/inflammatory conditions that affect neuroanatomical structures or networks critical for memory formation and retrieval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 1\",\"pages\":\"67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12845-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12845-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identification and diagnosis of ultra-rapid progressive dementia: evidence from a prospective cohort study and systematic literature review.
Background and objectives: The term rapid progressive dementia (RPD) may be applied to patients who develop dementia within 1 year or complete incapacitation within 2 years of the first symptom of impairment. However, in select cases, cognitive impairment may emerge abruptly, with symptoms evolving across hours or days. We sought to determine the frequency, etiologies, and factors that associated with ultra-RPD.
Methods: Ultra-RPD was defined as persistent dementia (global Clinical Dementia Rating® ≥ 1), developing within 7 days of initial symptoms. Patients with ultra-RPD were identified via case review of patients enrolled in a prospective study of RPD at two tertiary care centers (February 2016-September 2023) followed by a systematic review of multiple English-language databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (completed January 2024).
Results: Three of 188 patients with RPD enrolled in our prospective series met the proposed definition for ultra-RPD (frequency = 1.6%). Systematic review yielded 57 additional cases from 47 publications (60 total cases). Ultra-RPD was attributed to vascular (40%), toxic/metabolic (22%), autoimmune/inflammatory (20%), and iatrogenic/structural (12%) causes. Lesions within the Papez circuit were detected in 52/59 (88%) of patients on neuroimaging. Twelve patients (20%) had potentially treatable causes of ultra-RPD.
Discussion: Patients with ultra-RPD were rarely encountered in our prospective series, representing < 2% of cases of RPD, and rarely reported in the extant literature. The evaluation of patients with ultra-RPD should prioritize testing for vascular, toxic/metabolic, and autoimmune/inflammatory conditions that affect neuroanatomical structures or networks critical for memory formation and retrieval.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.