分享创伤经历的本质:我们何时、如何以及多久与他人分享创伤?

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1177/00332941241301357
Nadine P Hutchison, Emma F Thomas, Melanie K T Takarangi
{"title":"分享创伤经历的本质:我们何时、如何以及多久与他人分享创伤?","authors":"Nadine P Hutchison, Emma F Thomas, Melanie K T Takarangi","doi":"10.1177/00332941241301357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Across two studies, we investigated when, how, and how often people share traumatic events (<i>N</i> = 1008). In Study 1, most participants (78.5%) perceived their most stressful/traumatic event as shared primarily due to knowing others were present during the event (physical sharing), knowing/believing others had experienced or could experience a similar event (relational sharing), discussing the event with others (verbal sharing), or having the same emotions about the event as others (emotional sharing). In Study 2, we assessed the frequency and characteristics of these forms of sharing along with attitudinal sharing (same attitudes/beliefs/opinions about the event) and perpetrator sharing (perpetrator involved in the event). Nearly all participants (98.6%-99.4%) shared their most stressful/traumatic event with others in some way. Our findings demonstrate that people <i>commonly</i> share a <i>range of</i> traumatic events in various <i>unique</i> ways. This framework can inform and guide research addressing the impacts of these diverging forms of sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941241301357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nature of Shared Traumatic Experiences: When, How, and How Often Do We Share Trauma With Others?\",\"authors\":\"Nadine P Hutchison, Emma F Thomas, Melanie K T Takarangi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00332941241301357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Across two studies, we investigated when, how, and how often people share traumatic events (<i>N</i> = 1008). In Study 1, most participants (78.5%) perceived their most stressful/traumatic event as shared primarily due to knowing others were present during the event (physical sharing), knowing/believing others had experienced or could experience a similar event (relational sharing), discussing the event with others (verbal sharing), or having the same emotions about the event as others (emotional sharing). In Study 2, we assessed the frequency and characteristics of these forms of sharing along with attitudinal sharing (same attitudes/beliefs/opinions about the event) and perpetrator sharing (perpetrator involved in the event). Nearly all participants (98.6%-99.4%) shared their most stressful/traumatic event with others in some way. Our findings demonstrate that people <i>commonly</i> share a <i>range of</i> traumatic events in various <i>unique</i> ways. This framework can inform and guide research addressing the impacts of these diverging forms of sharing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332941241301357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241301357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241301357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在两项研究中,我们调查了人们分享创伤性事件的时间、方式和频率(N = 1008)。在研究1中,大多数参与者(78.5%)认为他们最紧张/创伤的事件是共享的,主要是因为知道其他人在事件发生时在场(身体分享),知道/相信其他人经历或可能经历类似的事件(关系分享),与他人讨论事件(言语分享),或者对事件有相同的情绪(情感分享)。在研究2中,我们评估了这些分享形式的频率和特征,以及态度分享(对事件的相同态度/信念/意见)和行为人分享(参与事件的行为人)。几乎所有的参与者(98.6%-99.4%)都以某种方式与他人分享了他们最紧张/创伤的事件。我们的研究结果表明,人们通常以各种独特的方式分享一系列创伤性事件。这个框架可以为解决这些不同的共享形式的影响的研究提供信息和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Nature of Shared Traumatic Experiences: When, How, and How Often Do We Share Trauma With Others?

Across two studies, we investigated when, how, and how often people share traumatic events (N = 1008). In Study 1, most participants (78.5%) perceived their most stressful/traumatic event as shared primarily due to knowing others were present during the event (physical sharing), knowing/believing others had experienced or could experience a similar event (relational sharing), discussing the event with others (verbal sharing), or having the same emotions about the event as others (emotional sharing). In Study 2, we assessed the frequency and characteristics of these forms of sharing along with attitudinal sharing (same attitudes/beliefs/opinions about the event) and perpetrator sharing (perpetrator involved in the event). Nearly all participants (98.6%-99.4%) shared their most stressful/traumatic event with others in some way. Our findings demonstrate that people commonly share a range of traumatic events in various unique ways. This framework can inform and guide research addressing the impacts of these diverging forms of sharing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Examining the Effect of Threatened Masculinity on Gun Violence. Mental Illness, Gun Access and Carrying: A Test of Competing Hypotheses. Gun Owners Views on Gun Control in the United States: A Qualitative Study. Examining the Relation Between Early Violence Exposure and Firearm-Related Experiences in Emerging Adulthood: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Recommendations for the Clinician Role in Reducing Gun Violence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1