肺动脉高压和慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压的右心室卒中工作指数:一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pulmonary Circulation Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/pul2.12433
Györgyi Csósza, Luca Valkó, Elek Dinya, György Losonczy, Veronika Müller, Zsófia Lázár, Kristóf Karlócai
{"title":"肺动脉高压和慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压的右心室卒中工作指数:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Györgyi Csósza, Luca Valkó, Elek Dinya, György Losonczy, Veronika Müller, Zsófia Lázár, Kristóf Karlócai","doi":"10.1002/pul2.12433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) reflects the active work of the right ventricle (RV), but its clinical usefulness is not yet fully known in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We aimed to evaluate the correlation of RVSWI to clinical parameters, the presence of comorbidities and response to therapy. We performed a retrospective observational study of 54 patients (PAH: <i>N</i> = 30, CTEPH: <i>N</i> = 24) and control patients (<i>N</i> = 11), and collected clinical data including RVSWI and comorbidities at baseline. We also compared changes in the parameters of the four-strata mortality risk score at follow-up (median time of 12 months) after the initiation of therapy between patients with low- (<1450 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>N</i> = 18) and high-RVSWI values (≥1450 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>N</i> = 19). RVSWI at diagnosis was higher in PAH/CTEPH compared to control subjects (1408 ± 391 vs. 704 ± 140 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001, mean ± standard deviation, <i>t</i>-test), but did not differ between PAH and CTEPH patients (1406 ± 342 vs. 1409 ± 470 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.98). Patients without comorbidities had higher RVSWI than those with comorbidities (<i>N</i> = 23: 1522 ± 400 vs. <i>N</i> = 31: 1323 ± 384 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.04), which was also found in PAH (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but not in CTEPH (<i>p</i> = 0.37). A greater improvement in the four-strata mortality risk score (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and a trend for a larger reduction in N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide concentration (<i>p</i> = 0.06) were observed in the high-RVSWI subgroup than in the low-RVSWI patients at follow-up. In PAH and CTEPH, RVSWI provides additional information on RV function in comorbidities, and it may predict response to specific therapy. Regular monitoring of RVSWI may aid in optimizing therapy selection and timing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":"14 4","pages":"e12433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right ventricular stroke work index in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Györgyi Csósza, Luca Valkó, Elek Dinya, György Losonczy, Veronika Müller, Zsófia Lázár, Kristóf Karlócai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pul2.12433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) reflects the active work of the right ventricle (RV), but its clinical usefulness is not yet fully known in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We aimed to evaluate the correlation of RVSWI to clinical parameters, the presence of comorbidities and response to therapy. We performed a retrospective observational study of 54 patients (PAH: <i>N</i> = 30, CTEPH: <i>N</i> = 24) and control patients (<i>N</i> = 11), and collected clinical data including RVSWI and comorbidities at baseline. We also compared changes in the parameters of the four-strata mortality risk score at follow-up (median time of 12 months) after the initiation of therapy between patients with low- (<1450 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>N</i> = 18) and high-RVSWI values (≥1450 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>N</i> = 19). RVSWI at diagnosis was higher in PAH/CTEPH compared to control subjects (1408 ± 391 vs. 704 ± 140 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001, mean ± standard deviation, <i>t</i>-test), but did not differ between PAH and CTEPH patients (1406 ± 342 vs. 1409 ± 470 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.98). Patients without comorbidities had higher RVSWI than those with comorbidities (<i>N</i> = 23: 1522 ± 400 vs. <i>N</i> = 31: 1323 ± 384 mmHg*mL/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.04), which was also found in PAH (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but not in CTEPH (<i>p</i> = 0.37). A greater improvement in the four-strata mortality risk score (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and a trend for a larger reduction in N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide concentration (<i>p</i> = 0.06) were observed in the high-RVSWI subgroup than in the low-RVSWI patients at follow-up. In PAH and CTEPH, RVSWI provides additional information on RV function in comorbidities, and it may predict response to specific therapy. Regular monitoring of RVSWI may aid in optimizing therapy selection and timing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"e12433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645440/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12433\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

右心室卒中工作指数(RVSWI)反映了右心室(RV)的活跃工作,但其在肺动脉高压(PAH)和慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)中的临床应用尚不完全清楚。我们的目的是评估RVSWI与临床参数、合并症的存在和对治疗的反应的相关性。我们对54例患者(PAH: N = 30, CTEPH: N = 24)和对照患者(N = 11)进行了回顾性观察研究,收集了包括RVSWI和基线合并症在内的临床数据。我们还比较了低rvswi值(2例,N = 18)和高rvswi值(≥1450 mmHg*mL/m2, N = 19)患者开始治疗后随访时(中位时间为12个月)四层死亡风险评分参数的变化。PAH/CTEPH患者诊断时RVSWI高于对照组(1408±391比704±140 mmHg*mL/m2, p t检验),但PAH和CTEPH患者之间无差异(1406±342比1409±470 mmHg*mL/m2, p = 0.98)。无合并症患者RVSWI高于有合并症患者(N = 23:1522±400 vs. N = 31:1323±384 mmHg*mL/m2, p = 0.04), PAH患者RVSWI高于无合并症患者(p = 0.37)。随访时,高rvswi亚组的四层死亡风险评分比低rvswi患者有更大的改善(p p = 0.06)。在PAH和CTEPH中,RVSWI提供了合并症中RV功能的额外信息,并且可以预测对特定治疗的反应。定期监测RVSWI可能有助于优化治疗选择和时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Right ventricular stroke work index in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A retrospective observational study.

The right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) reflects the active work of the right ventricle (RV), but its clinical usefulness is not yet fully known in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We aimed to evaluate the correlation of RVSWI to clinical parameters, the presence of comorbidities and response to therapy. We performed a retrospective observational study of 54 patients (PAH: N = 30, CTEPH: N = 24) and control patients (N = 11), and collected clinical data including RVSWI and comorbidities at baseline. We also compared changes in the parameters of the four-strata mortality risk score at follow-up (median time of 12 months) after the initiation of therapy between patients with low- (<1450 mmHg*mL/m2, N = 18) and high-RVSWI values (≥1450 mmHg*mL/m2, N = 19). RVSWI at diagnosis was higher in PAH/CTEPH compared to control subjects (1408 ± 391 vs. 704 ± 140 mmHg*mL/m2, p < 0.001, mean ± standard deviation, t-test), but did not differ between PAH and CTEPH patients (1406 ± 342 vs. 1409 ± 470 mmHg*mL/m2, p = 0.98). Patients without comorbidities had higher RVSWI than those with comorbidities (N = 23: 1522 ± 400 vs. N = 31: 1323 ± 384 mmHg*mL/m2, p = 0.04), which was also found in PAH (p < 0.001), but not in CTEPH (p = 0.37). A greater improvement in the four-strata mortality risk score (p < 0.05) and a trend for a larger reduction in N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide concentration (p = 0.06) were observed in the high-RVSWI subgroup than in the low-RVSWI patients at follow-up. In PAH and CTEPH, RVSWI provides additional information on RV function in comorbidities, and it may predict response to specific therapy. Regular monitoring of RVSWI may aid in optimizing therapy selection and timing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Circulation
Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Heart Rate Variability in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing With Simultaneous Echocardiography After Pulmonary Embolism. Treatment pathways in Finnish patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Pulmonary Hypertension: A Personal Journey. Revised Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension Criteria and Their Prognostic Value in IPF Transplant Waitlist Survival.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1