家庭医生和肺科医生在慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗中气道清除装置处方实践的观察性研究

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17534666241307066
Saeed Mardy Alghamdi, Abdulaziz A Alzahrani, Mohammad S Dairi, Hassan Alwafi, Abdulelah M Aldhahir, Jaber S Alqahtani, Mohammed M Alqahtani, Abdullah M Alanazi, Abdullah A Alqarni, Rayan A Siraj, Noha Saeed Alghamdi, Hassan A Alzahrani, Abdulghani A Alhindi
{"title":"家庭医生和肺科医生在慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗中气道清除装置处方实践的观察性研究","authors":"Saeed Mardy Alghamdi, Abdulaziz A Alzahrani, Mohammad S Dairi, Hassan Alwafi, Abdulelah M Aldhahir, Jaber S Alqahtani, Mohammed M Alqahtani, Abdullah M Alanazi, Abdullah A Alqarni, Rayan A Siraj, Noha Saeed Alghamdi, Hassan A Alzahrani, Abdulghani A Alhindi","doi":"10.1177/17534666241307066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Productive cough with sputum is a prominent sign generally associated with respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Airway clearance devices are an option for COPD management, but physicians' preferences for and clinical practice with them are not known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore preferences for and clinical practice with airway clearance devices among physicians in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire was conducted between October 2022 and September 2023, which included a review of respiratory medication prescriptions by physicians for patients with COPD. The analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants were 445 physicians. The majority were female, accounting for 64.3% of the sample. Flutter and Acapella were the most commonly preferred airway clearance devices (45.8% and 20.7%, respectively). Among the participants, 12.6% reported unfamiliarity with any of the mentioned devices. Of the participants, 43.6% \"usually\" suggested the devices for patients with daily, difficult-to-clear, thick sputum, while 27% \"sometimes\" recommended them to COPD patients who had experienced four exacerbations or more. In routine clinical practice, physicians prescribe pharmacological therapies as the main treatment. The prescribing data showed that in the last year, there was no record of prescribed airway clearance devices for COPD by physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family and pulmonary physicians prefer Flutter and Acapella devices, but a significant number of physicians are unaware of such devices. Prescribing data showed no record of prescribed airway clearance devices for COPD management. Further initiatives are needed to increase awareness in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22884,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"17534666241307066"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational study on the prescription practices of family and pulmonary physicians for airway clearance devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management.\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Mardy Alghamdi, Abdulaziz A Alzahrani, Mohammad S Dairi, Hassan Alwafi, Abdulelah M Aldhahir, Jaber S Alqahtani, Mohammed M Alqahtani, Abdullah M Alanazi, Abdullah A Alqarni, Rayan A Siraj, Noha Saeed Alghamdi, Hassan A Alzahrani, Abdulghani A Alhindi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17534666241307066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Productive cough with sputum is a prominent sign generally associated with respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Airway clearance devices are an option for COPD management, but physicians' preferences for and clinical practice with them are not known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore preferences for and clinical practice with airway clearance devices among physicians in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire was conducted between October 2022 and September 2023, which included a review of respiratory medication prescriptions by physicians for patients with COPD. The analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants were 445 physicians. The majority were female, accounting for 64.3% of the sample. Flutter and Acapella were the most commonly preferred airway clearance devices (45.8% and 20.7%, respectively). Among the participants, 12.6% reported unfamiliarity with any of the mentioned devices. Of the participants, 43.6% \\\"usually\\\" suggested the devices for patients with daily, difficult-to-clear, thick sputum, while 27% \\\"sometimes\\\" recommended them to COPD patients who had experienced four exacerbations or more. In routine clinical practice, physicians prescribe pharmacological therapies as the main treatment. The prescribing data showed that in the last year, there was no record of prescribed airway clearance devices for COPD by physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family and pulmonary physicians prefer Flutter and Acapella devices, but a significant number of physicians are unaware of such devices. Prescribing data showed no record of prescribed airway clearance devices for COPD management. Further initiatives are needed to increase awareness in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"17534666241307066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666241307066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666241307066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:咳痰是呼吸系统疾病(包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD))的一个显著体征。气道清除装置是COPD治疗的一种选择,但医生对其的偏好和临床实践尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在探讨沙特阿拉伯医生对气道清除装置的偏好和临床实践。设计:观察性横断面调查。方法:在2022年10月至2023年9月期间进行了一项自我管理的问卷调查,其中包括对医生为COPD患者开具的呼吸药物处方的回顾。使用社会科学统计软件包进行分析。结果:共纳入445名医生。以女性居多,占样本的64.3%。扑动和Acapella是最常用的气道清除装置(分别为45.8%和20.7%)。在参与者中,12.6%的人表示不熟悉上述任何一种设备。在参与者中,43.6%的人“通常”建议对日常痰难清、痰厚的患者使用这种设备,而27%的人“有时”建议对经历过四次或更多次急性加重的COPD患者使用这种设备。在常规临床实践中,医生将药物治疗作为主要治疗方法。处方数据显示,在过去的一年里,没有医生为慢性阻塞性肺病开具气道清除设备的记录。结论:家庭医生和肺科医生更喜欢Flutter和Acapella装置,但相当多的医生不知道这类装置。处方数据显示没有用于COPD管理的气道清除装置的记录。需要采取进一步的举措来提高临床实践中的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observational study on the prescription practices of family and pulmonary physicians for airway clearance devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management.

Background: Productive cough with sputum is a prominent sign generally associated with respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Airway clearance devices are an option for COPD management, but physicians' preferences for and clinical practice with them are not known.

Objective: This study aims to explore preferences for and clinical practice with airway clearance devices among physicians in Saudi Arabia.

Design: An observational, cross-sectional survey.

Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was conducted between October 2022 and September 2023, which included a review of respiratory medication prescriptions by physicians for patients with COPD. The analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.

Results: The participants were 445 physicians. The majority were female, accounting for 64.3% of the sample. Flutter and Acapella were the most commonly preferred airway clearance devices (45.8% and 20.7%, respectively). Among the participants, 12.6% reported unfamiliarity with any of the mentioned devices. Of the participants, 43.6% "usually" suggested the devices for patients with daily, difficult-to-clear, thick sputum, while 27% "sometimes" recommended them to COPD patients who had experienced four exacerbations or more. In routine clinical practice, physicians prescribe pharmacological therapies as the main treatment. The prescribing data showed that in the last year, there was no record of prescribed airway clearance devices for COPD by physicians.

Conclusion: Family and pulmonary physicians prefer Flutter and Acapella devices, but a significant number of physicians are unaware of such devices. Prescribing data showed no record of prescribed airway clearance devices for COPD management. Further initiatives are needed to increase awareness in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of respiratory disease.
期刊最新文献
Potential of phosphodiesterase 4B inhibition in the treatment of progressive pulmonary fibrosis. A real-world study to evaluate effectiveness of mepolizumab in treating severe asthma in Taiwan (REMIT). Association between albumin corrected anion gap and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Prone positioning during CPAP therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a concise clinical review. Liver injury due to endothelin receptor antagonists: a real-world study based on post-marketing drug monitoring data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1