Cobas MTB和Logix Smart MTB诊断肺结核和肺外肺结核的诊断性能:诊断试验的横断面研究。

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-12-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361241304516
Miguel Hueda-Zavaleta, Juan Carlos Gomez de la Torre, Diana Minchón-Vizconde, Claudia Barletta-Carrillo, Cesar Copaja-Corzo, Gustavo Tapia-Sequeiros, Cinthya Flores, Cristian Piscoche, Cecilia Miranda, Ada Mendoza, Vicente A Benites-Zapata
{"title":"Cobas MTB和Logix Smart MTB诊断肺结核和肺外肺结核的诊断性能:诊断试验的横断面研究。","authors":"Miguel Hueda-Zavaleta, Juan Carlos Gomez de la Torre, Diana Minchón-Vizconde, Claudia Barletta-Carrillo, Cesar Copaja-Corzo, Gustavo Tapia-Sequeiros, Cinthya Flores, Cristian Piscoche, Cecilia Miranda, Ada Mendoza, Vicente A Benites-Zapata","doi":"10.1177/20499361241304516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molecular tests have contributed to reducing the mortality rate through early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). This is due to their low processing complexity and diagnostic accuracy superior to conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Cobas MTB and Logix Smart MTB compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study of diagnostic tests was carried out in a clinical laboratory in Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples from patients with presumptive TB who had been subjected to smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, Cobas MTB, Logix Smart MTB, and mycobacteria culture were included to determine their diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 samples were included, 102 (58.3%) of pulmonary origin and 73 (41.7%) of extrapulmonary origin. Among the total samples, 19 (10.9%) had positive cultures (all were pulmonary samples), 48 (27.4%) had positive Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra results, 45 (25.7%) had positive Cobas MTB results, and 36 (20.6%) had positive Logix Smart MTB results. The agreement between Cobas MTB and Logix Smart with the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra was 97.1% and 93.8%, respectively. Compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, the area under the curve/receiver operating characteristic and sensitivity of the Cobas MTB and Logix Smart methods were 0.95 and 91.7%, and 0.90 and 81.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cobas MTB and Logix Smart presented adequate performance for diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis comparable to the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20499361241304516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of the Cobas MTB and Logix Smart MTB for diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a cross-sectional study of diagnostic tests.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Hueda-Zavaleta, Juan Carlos Gomez de la Torre, Diana Minchón-Vizconde, Claudia Barletta-Carrillo, Cesar Copaja-Corzo, Gustavo Tapia-Sequeiros, Cinthya Flores, Cristian Piscoche, Cecilia Miranda, Ada Mendoza, Vicente A Benites-Zapata\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20499361241304516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molecular tests have contributed to reducing the mortality rate through early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). This is due to their low processing complexity and diagnostic accuracy superior to conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Cobas MTB and Logix Smart MTB compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study of diagnostic tests was carried out in a clinical laboratory in Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples from patients with presumptive TB who had been subjected to smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, Cobas MTB, Logix Smart MTB, and mycobacteria culture were included to determine their diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 samples were included, 102 (58.3%) of pulmonary origin and 73 (41.7%) of extrapulmonary origin. Among the total samples, 19 (10.9%) had positive cultures (all were pulmonary samples), 48 (27.4%) had positive Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra results, 45 (25.7%) had positive Cobas MTB results, and 36 (20.6%) had positive Logix Smart MTB results. The agreement between Cobas MTB and Logix Smart with the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra was 97.1% and 93.8%, respectively. Compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, the area under the curve/receiver operating characteristic and sensitivity of the Cobas MTB and Logix Smart methods were 0.95 and 91.7%, and 0.90 and 81.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cobas MTB and Logix Smart presented adequate performance for diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis comparable to the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20499361241304516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241304516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241304516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:分子检测通过早期准确诊断结核病(TB),为降低死亡率做出了贡献。这是因为分子检验的处理复杂性低,诊断准确性优于传统方法:与 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 相比,评估 Cobas MTB 和 Logix Smart MTB 对肺结核(PTB)和肺外结核(EPTB)的诊断性能:设计:在秘鲁利马的一家临床实验室开展了一项诊断测试横断面研究:方法:纳入所有经过涂片显微镜检查、Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra、Cobas MTB、Logix Smart MTB 和分枝杆菌培养的推定肺结核患者的肺部和肺外样本,以确定其诊断性能:结果:共纳入 175 份样本,其中 102 份(58.3%)来自肺部,73 份(41.7%)来自肺外。在所有样本中,19 份样本(10.9%)的培养结果呈阳性(均为肺部样本),48 份样本(27.4%)的 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 结果呈阳性,45 份样本(25.7%)的 Cobas MTB 结果呈阳性,36 份样本(20.6%)的 Logix Smart MTB 结果呈阳性。Cobas MTB 和 Logix Smart 与 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 的一致性分别为 97.1%和 93.8%。与 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 相比,Cobas MTB 和 Logix Smart 方法的曲线下面积/接收器工作特征和灵敏度分别为 0.95% 和 91.7%,以及 0.90% 和 81.0%:Cobas MTB 和 Logix Smart 在诊断肺部和肺外结核病方面的性能足以媲美 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic performance of the Cobas MTB and Logix Smart MTB for diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a cross-sectional study of diagnostic tests.

Background: Molecular tests have contributed to reducing the mortality rate through early and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). This is due to their low processing complexity and diagnostic accuracy superior to conventional methods.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Cobas MTB and Logix Smart MTB compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB).

Design: A cross-sectional study of diagnostic tests was carried out in a clinical laboratory in Lima, Peru.

Methods: All pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples from patients with presumptive TB who had been subjected to smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, Cobas MTB, Logix Smart MTB, and mycobacteria culture were included to determine their diagnostic performance.

Results: A total of 175 samples were included, 102 (58.3%) of pulmonary origin and 73 (41.7%) of extrapulmonary origin. Among the total samples, 19 (10.9%) had positive cultures (all were pulmonary samples), 48 (27.4%) had positive Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra results, 45 (25.7%) had positive Cobas MTB results, and 36 (20.6%) had positive Logix Smart MTB results. The agreement between Cobas MTB and Logix Smart with the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra was 97.1% and 93.8%, respectively. Compared to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, the area under the curve/receiver operating characteristic and sensitivity of the Cobas MTB and Logix Smart methods were 0.95 and 91.7%, and 0.90 and 81.0%, respectively.

Conclusion: Cobas MTB and Logix Smart presented adequate performance for diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis comparable to the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of a pilot randomized clinical trial testing brief interventions to increase HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among rural people who inject drugs attending syringe services programs. Phage therapy in the management of respiratory and pulmonary infections: a systematic review. The utilization of microbial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing for the detection of human herpesvirus-8 in a quaternary care center. Infection prevention in the immunocompromised traveler due to conditions other than transplantation: a review. A prospective study to evaluate high dose daptomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Staphylococcus spp. infective endocarditis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1