Ke Liu , Shuyi Wang , Minhui Liu , Siyuan Tang , Qirong Chen
{"title":"提高临床护理实习生核心能力的干预措施：系统综述。","authors":"Ke Liu , Shuyi Wang , Minhui Liu , Siyuan Tang , Qirong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aim</div><div>This systematic review aimed to identify intervention studies on core competencies of clinical nursing preceptors, evaluate their quality using quantitative indicators, and summarize the effectiveness of the intervention programs and limitations of included studies.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Between May 1, 2024 and May 30, 2024, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE and ProQuest (Health & Medical Collection) to get relevant literature published between January 2010 and May 2024. The main search concepts were core competence; preceptor; intervention; nurse. References in all eligible literature were also searched to prevent omissions.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>Articles were screened and then evaluated by two researchers independently. The narrative table was used to summarize the characteristics of the included studies and the details of interventions. The modified Educational Interventions Critical Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of studies; the Kirkpatrick Model was used to assess the interventions. The content analysis method was used to synthesize data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 27 articles were included in this review. Six studies were rated as high quality. The remaining 21 studies were all rated as moderate quality and no studies were rated as low quality. Eight studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 1, all the studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 2, six studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 3, Only one study achieved the Kirkpatrick level 4.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Interventions that covered key content themes, used face-to-face training method, and had shorter intervals may be more effective. Future studies could be improved by involving more representative samples, developing interventions based on theories, evaluating the long-term effects of the interventions. This review provided implications for developing more effective and sustainable educational programs for clinical nursing preceptors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 106536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to enhance the core competencies of clinical nursing preceptors: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Ke Liu , Shuyi Wang , Minhui Liu , Siyuan Tang , Qirong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Aim</div><div>This systematic review aimed to identify intervention studies on core competencies of clinical nursing preceptors, evaluate their quality using quantitative indicators, and summarize the effectiveness of the intervention programs and limitations of included studies.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Between May 1, 2024 and May 30, 2024, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE and ProQuest (Health & Medical Collection) to get relevant literature published between January 2010 and May 2024. The main search concepts were core competence; preceptor; intervention; nurse. References in all eligible literature were also searched to prevent omissions.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>Articles were screened and then evaluated by two researchers independently. The narrative table was used to summarize the characteristics of the included studies and the details of interventions. The modified Educational Interventions Critical Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of studies; the Kirkpatrick Model was used to assess the interventions. The content analysis method was used to synthesize data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 27 articles were included in this review. Six studies were rated as high quality. The remaining 21 studies were all rated as moderate quality and no studies were rated as low quality. Eight studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 1, all the studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 2, six studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 3, Only one study achieved the Kirkpatrick level 4.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Interventions that covered key content themes, used face-to-face training method, and had shorter intervals may be more effective. Future studies could be improved by involving more representative samples, developing interventions based on theories, evaluating the long-term effects of the interventions. This review provided implications for developing more effective and sustainable educational programs for clinical nursing preceptors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724004465\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724004465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interventions to enhance the core competencies of clinical nursing preceptors: A systematic review
Aim
This systematic review aimed to identify intervention studies on core competencies of clinical nursing preceptors, evaluate their quality using quantitative indicators, and summarize the effectiveness of the intervention programs and limitations of included studies.
Design
This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist.
Data sources
Between May 1, 2024 and May 30, 2024, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE and ProQuest (Health & Medical Collection) to get relevant literature published between January 2010 and May 2024. The main search concepts were core competence; preceptor; intervention; nurse. References in all eligible literature were also searched to prevent omissions.
Review methods
Articles were screened and then evaluated by two researchers independently. The narrative table was used to summarize the characteristics of the included studies and the details of interventions. The modified Educational Interventions Critical Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of studies; the Kirkpatrick Model was used to assess the interventions. The content analysis method was used to synthesize data.
Results
A total of 27 articles were included in this review. Six studies were rated as high quality. The remaining 21 studies were all rated as moderate quality and no studies were rated as low quality. Eight studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 1, all the studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 2, six studies achieved the Kirkpatrick level 3, Only one study achieved the Kirkpatrick level 4.
Conclusions
Interventions that covered key content themes, used face-to-face training method, and had shorter intervals may be more effective. Future studies could be improved by involving more representative samples, developing interventions based on theories, evaluating the long-term effects of the interventions. This review provided implications for developing more effective and sustainable educational programs for clinical nursing preceptors.
期刊介绍：
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
