公众对医疗创新研发的贡献:分析框架。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105235
Claudia Wild, Ozren Sehic, Louise Schmidt, Daniel Fabian
{"title":"公众对医疗创新研发的贡献:分析框架。","authors":"Claudia Wild,&nbsp;Ozren Sehic,&nbsp;Louise Schmidt,&nbsp;Daniel Fabian","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Article 57 of the proposed European Union (EU) Pharmaceutical Legislation (PL, Directive) will require market authorization applicants to publicly declare any direct financial support for R&amp;D received from public authorities. Our research aims to identify the categories needed to capture direct or indirect public contributions to R&amp;D, provide a framework for standardized reporting of public contributions, and reduce ambiguity in the interpretation of “direct” and “indirect” public contributions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An iterative mixed-methods approach is applied: a targeted literature review was conducted, complemented by interviews with representatives of different stakeholder groups to identify categories of public contributions to R&amp;D, followed by searches for relevant data sources.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>26 publications on primary data relevant to analyses of public contributions were identified, finding that between half of all drugs approved and &gt;90 % of drug targets are associated with public sector institutions and/ or their spin-outs. Eight categories of public contributions to medical innovations were identified along the value chain (from basic research to post-market surveillance).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>The framework offers a structured and systematic approach for identifying data on public and philanthropic contributions to developing medical products (medicines and devices). This information is often not comprehensively documented. Therefore, aligned public policies enforcing transparent and standardized reporting in sufficient granularity on R&amp;D investments and conditions are key.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 105235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public contributions to R&D of medical innovations: A framework for analysis\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Wild,&nbsp;Ozren Sehic,&nbsp;Louise Schmidt,&nbsp;Daniel Fabian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Article 57 of the proposed European Union (EU) Pharmaceutical Legislation (PL, Directive) will require market authorization applicants to publicly declare any direct financial support for R&amp;D received from public authorities. Our research aims to identify the categories needed to capture direct or indirect public contributions to R&amp;D, provide a framework for standardized reporting of public contributions, and reduce ambiguity in the interpretation of “direct” and “indirect” public contributions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An iterative mixed-methods approach is applied: a targeted literature review was conducted, complemented by interviews with representatives of different stakeholder groups to identify categories of public contributions to R&amp;D, followed by searches for relevant data sources.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>26 publications on primary data relevant to analyses of public contributions were identified, finding that between half of all drugs approved and &gt;90 % of drug targets are associated with public sector institutions and/ or their spin-outs. Eight categories of public contributions to medical innovations were identified along the value chain (from basic research to post-market surveillance).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>The framework offers a structured and systematic approach for identifying data on public and philanthropic contributions to developing medical products (medicines and devices). This information is often not comprehensively documented. Therefore, aligned public policies enforcing transparent and standardized reporting in sufficient granularity on R&amp;D investments and conditions are key.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024002458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024002458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:拟议的欧盟(EU)药品立法(PL,指令)第57条将要求市场授权申请人公开声明从公共当局获得的任何对研发的直接财政支持。我们的研究旨在确定捕获对研发的直接或间接公共贡献所需的类别,为公共贡献的标准化报告提供框架,并减少对“直接”和“间接”公共贡献的模糊解释。方法:采用迭代混合方法:进行有针对性的文献综述,辅以与不同利益相关者群体代表的访谈,以确定公共对研发的贡献类别,然后搜索相关数据源。结果:确定了26份关于与公共贡献分析相关的原始数据的出版物,发现在所有批准的药物中有一半到50%之间,90%的药物靶标与公共部门机构和/或其衍生产品有关。确定了沿着价值链(从基础研究到上市后监测)对医疗创新的八类公共贡献。讨论和结论:该框架提供了一种结构化和系统的方法,用于确定有关公共和慈善机构对开发医疗产品(药品和器械)的捐款的数据。这些信息通常没有完整的文档。因此,协调一致的公共政策对研发投资和条件进行足够粒度的透明和标准化报告是关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public contributions to R&D of medical innovations: A framework for analysis

Background and Objective

Article 57 of the proposed European Union (EU) Pharmaceutical Legislation (PL, Directive) will require market authorization applicants to publicly declare any direct financial support for R&D received from public authorities. Our research aims to identify the categories needed to capture direct or indirect public contributions to R&D, provide a framework for standardized reporting of public contributions, and reduce ambiguity in the interpretation of “direct” and “indirect” public contributions.

Methods

An iterative mixed-methods approach is applied: a targeted literature review was conducted, complemented by interviews with representatives of different stakeholder groups to identify categories of public contributions to R&D, followed by searches for relevant data sources.

Results

26 publications on primary data relevant to analyses of public contributions were identified, finding that between half of all drugs approved and >90 % of drug targets are associated with public sector institutions and/ or their spin-outs. Eight categories of public contributions to medical innovations were identified along the value chain (from basic research to post-market surveillance).

Discussion and conclusion

The framework offers a structured and systematic approach for identifying data on public and philanthropic contributions to developing medical products (medicines and devices). This information is often not comprehensively documented. Therefore, aligned public policies enforcing transparent and standardized reporting in sufficient granularity on R&D investments and conditions are key.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Development of an organizational typology of interprofessional primary care teams in Quebec, Canada: A multivariate analysis A good start for all children: Integrating early-life course medical and social care through Solid Start, the Netherlands’ nationwide action programme Caregiver preferences and willingness-to-pay for home care services for older people with dementia: A discrete choice experiment in the Milan metropolitan area How beliefs and policy characteristics shape the public acceptability of nutritional policies—A survey study in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1