循环塑料联盟在欧盟向欧洲塑料循环经济过渡中的规范作用。

Circular economy and sustainability Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s43615-024-00380-8
Amy O'Halloran
{"title":"循环塑料联盟在欧盟向欧洲塑料循环经济过渡中的规范作用。","authors":"Amy O'Halloran","doi":"10.1007/s43615-024-00380-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global pollution and waste crisis presents us with environmental and economic challenges which if not properly addressed could destabilise or threaten the survival and welfare of societies. The European Union is responding to the waste and pollution crisis through its circular economy agenda that adopts a broad life-cycle approach to the regulation of plastics from production, consumption, disposal, and recycling. To operationalise its agenda, the European Union seeks to <i>inter alia</i> mobilise all actors towards the objective of improving the economics of plastic recycling. Given the potential for conflicts and disputes to proliferate across a broad range of societal actors and interests, it is perhaps not surprising that when we examine the evolving EU legal and normative framework for a circular plastics economy, we observe a polycentric governance arrangement that includes the EU institutions, the Circular Plastics Alliance (CPA), and European standardisation organisations (i.e. CEN and CENELEC). The normative interactions amongst these governance bodies will not easily be unveiled and understood if we enclose our perspectives and analyses within the limits of traditional legal paradigms that <i>only</i> focus upon the formal law-making processes that flow through the European Parliament, Council, and Commission. However, by applying Karl Llewellyn's law-jobs theory in this article, it is possible to analyse how a multiplicity of governance bodies perform certain <i>legal functions</i> that are contributing to the development of regulatory order for a European circular plastics economy. This article sets out a number of key findings in relation to the evolving legal and normative framework for a European circular plastics economy pertaining to the role of the CPA in framing problems, theorising solutions, and shaping the pathway of normative development towards a European circular plastics economy. To date, the CPA has identified obstacles to the expansion of the European recycled plastics market, and mapped the areas in need of standardisation if such obstacles are to be overcome This work by the CPA has prompted the European Commission to submit a standardisation request to the CEN and CENELEC calling for the development of harmonised standards to facilitate greater plastic recycling. While compliance with CEN and CENELEC standards would be voluntary, such standards could interact with the EU's proposed <i>Ecodesign Regulation</i> and any delegated acts adopted thereto, thereby creating legal obligations for a wide range of actors across plastic value chains.</p>","PeriodicalId":72595,"journal":{"name":"Circular economy and sustainability","volume":"4 4","pages":"2859-2887"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Normative Role of the Circular Plastics Alliance in the EU's Transition towards a European Circular Economy for Plastics.\",\"authors\":\"Amy O'Halloran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43615-024-00380-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The global pollution and waste crisis presents us with environmental and economic challenges which if not properly addressed could destabilise or threaten the survival and welfare of societies. The European Union is responding to the waste and pollution crisis through its circular economy agenda that adopts a broad life-cycle approach to the regulation of plastics from production, consumption, disposal, and recycling. To operationalise its agenda, the European Union seeks to <i>inter alia</i> mobilise all actors towards the objective of improving the economics of plastic recycling. Given the potential for conflicts and disputes to proliferate across a broad range of societal actors and interests, it is perhaps not surprising that when we examine the evolving EU legal and normative framework for a circular plastics economy, we observe a polycentric governance arrangement that includes the EU institutions, the Circular Plastics Alliance (CPA), and European standardisation organisations (i.e. CEN and CENELEC). The normative interactions amongst these governance bodies will not easily be unveiled and understood if we enclose our perspectives and analyses within the limits of traditional legal paradigms that <i>only</i> focus upon the formal law-making processes that flow through the European Parliament, Council, and Commission. However, by applying Karl Llewellyn's law-jobs theory in this article, it is possible to analyse how a multiplicity of governance bodies perform certain <i>legal functions</i> that are contributing to the development of regulatory order for a European circular plastics economy. This article sets out a number of key findings in relation to the evolving legal and normative framework for a European circular plastics economy pertaining to the role of the CPA in framing problems, theorising solutions, and shaping the pathway of normative development towards a European circular plastics economy. To date, the CPA has identified obstacles to the expansion of the European recycled plastics market, and mapped the areas in need of standardisation if such obstacles are to be overcome This work by the CPA has prompted the European Commission to submit a standardisation request to the CEN and CENELEC calling for the development of harmonised standards to facilitate greater plastic recycling. While compliance with CEN and CENELEC standards would be voluntary, such standards could interact with the EU's proposed <i>Ecodesign Regulation</i> and any delegated acts adopted thereto, thereby creating legal obligations for a wide range of actors across plastic value chains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circular economy and sustainability\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"2859-2887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634936/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circular economy and sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00380-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circular economy and sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00380-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球污染和废物危机给我们带来了环境和经济挑战,如果不能妥善解决,可能会破坏社会稳定或威胁社会的生存和福祉。欧洲联盟正在通过其循环经济议程来应对废物和污染危机,该议程采用广泛的生命周期方法来管理塑料的生产、消费、处置和回收。为落实该议程,欧盟除其他外,努力动员所有行为体,以实现改善塑料回收经济性的目标。鉴于冲突和争端有可能在广泛的社会参与者和利益集团之间激化,当我们研究欧盟不断发展的循环塑料经济法律和规范框架时,我们发现了一种多中心治理安排,其中包括欧盟机构、循环塑料联盟(CPA)和欧洲标准化组织(即 CEN 和 CENELEC),这也许并不令人惊讶。如果我们将视角和分析局限于传统的法律范式,只关注欧洲议会、理事会和委员会的正式法律制定过程,就很难揭示和理解这些治理机构之间的规范性互动。然而,通过在本文中应用卡尔-卢埃林的法律-工作理论,我们可以分析多种治理机构如何履行某些法律职能,从而促进欧洲循环塑料经济监管秩序的发展。本文列出了与欧洲循环塑料经济不断发展的法律和规范框架有关的一些重要发现,这些发现涉及《欧洲塑料工业委员会》在提出问题、理论化解决方案和塑造欧洲循环塑料经济规范发展路径方面所发挥的作用。迄今为止,CPA 已确定了扩大欧洲再生塑料市场的障碍,并绘制了需要标准化的领域图,以克服这些障碍。CPA 的这项工作促使欧盟委员会向 CEN 和 CENELEC 提交了一份标准化请求,呼吁制定统一标准,以促进更广泛的塑料循环利用。虽然遵守 CEN 和 CENELEC 标准属于自愿行为,但这些标准可与欧盟拟议的《生态设计法规》及其通过的任何授权法案相互作用,从而为塑料价值链上的众多参与者规定法律义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Normative Role of the Circular Plastics Alliance in the EU's Transition towards a European Circular Economy for Plastics.

The global pollution and waste crisis presents us with environmental and economic challenges which if not properly addressed could destabilise or threaten the survival and welfare of societies. The European Union is responding to the waste and pollution crisis through its circular economy agenda that adopts a broad life-cycle approach to the regulation of plastics from production, consumption, disposal, and recycling. To operationalise its agenda, the European Union seeks to inter alia mobilise all actors towards the objective of improving the economics of plastic recycling. Given the potential for conflicts and disputes to proliferate across a broad range of societal actors and interests, it is perhaps not surprising that when we examine the evolving EU legal and normative framework for a circular plastics economy, we observe a polycentric governance arrangement that includes the EU institutions, the Circular Plastics Alliance (CPA), and European standardisation organisations (i.e. CEN and CENELEC). The normative interactions amongst these governance bodies will not easily be unveiled and understood if we enclose our perspectives and analyses within the limits of traditional legal paradigms that only focus upon the formal law-making processes that flow through the European Parliament, Council, and Commission. However, by applying Karl Llewellyn's law-jobs theory in this article, it is possible to analyse how a multiplicity of governance bodies perform certain legal functions that are contributing to the development of regulatory order for a European circular plastics economy. This article sets out a number of key findings in relation to the evolving legal and normative framework for a European circular plastics economy pertaining to the role of the CPA in framing problems, theorising solutions, and shaping the pathway of normative development towards a European circular plastics economy. To date, the CPA has identified obstacles to the expansion of the European recycled plastics market, and mapped the areas in need of standardisation if such obstacles are to be overcome This work by the CPA has prompted the European Commission to submit a standardisation request to the CEN and CENELEC calling for the development of harmonised standards to facilitate greater plastic recycling. While compliance with CEN and CENELEC standards would be voluntary, such standards could interact with the EU's proposed Ecodesign Regulation and any delegated acts adopted thereto, thereby creating legal obligations for a wide range of actors across plastic value chains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Aquaponic System Sustainability via System Dynamics Modelling – FEW Nexus Approach Striving for Business Sustainability: Understanding the Interplay and Impact of Sustainable Finance, Environmental Social Governance Strategy, and Information Technology Integration on Sustainable Enterprise Performance Product Quality in the Circular Economy: A Systematic Review of its Definition and Contexts in Scientific Literature Exploring the Landscape of Contemporary Sustainability Philosophies: Origins, Synergies and Corporate Applications Economic Policy for  Sustainable Development: Role of Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy and Regulatory Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1