在背根神经节脉冲射频治疗中加入经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇是否会提高疗效?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-26 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.5606/tftrd.2024.13479
Gokhan Yildiz, Hamit Goksu, Erkan Yavuz Akcaboy, Seref Celik, Mustafa Yemliha Ayhan, Samet Sancar Kaya
{"title":"在背根神经节脉冲射频治疗中加入经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇是否会提高疗效?","authors":"Gokhan Yildiz, Hamit Goksu, Erkan Yavuz Akcaboy, Seref Celik, Mustafa Yemliha Ayhan, Samet Sancar Kaya","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.13479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and DRG PRF plus transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty-one patients (39 males, 42 females; mean age: 57.5±11.9 years; range 18 to 65 years) who underwent DRG PRF (Group 1) and 59 patients (34 males, 25 females; mean age: 58.7±12.3 years; range 18 to 65 years) who underwent DRG PRF plus TFESI (Group 2) between February 2021 and June 2022 were enrolled in the retrospective study. A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain severity. Patients in both groups were evaluated before treatment and at four weeks and six months after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-week and six-month VAS scores were significantly lower than the baseline VAS scores in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the VAS scores at baseline, four weeks, and six months. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the rate of pain reduction of 50% or more at either measurement point. The presence or absence of a previous lumbar surgery had no effect on achieving a significant decrease in pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although DRG PRF and TFESI are easy to apply together, adding corticosteroids to DRG PRF treatment for patients with chronic radicular pain did not improve long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 3","pages":"390-396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does transforaminal epidural steroid injection added to dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment increase efficacy?\",\"authors\":\"Gokhan Yildiz, Hamit Goksu, Erkan Yavuz Akcaboy, Seref Celik, Mustafa Yemliha Ayhan, Samet Sancar Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tftrd.2024.13479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and DRG PRF plus transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty-one patients (39 males, 42 females; mean age: 57.5±11.9 years; range 18 to 65 years) who underwent DRG PRF (Group 1) and 59 patients (34 males, 25 females; mean age: 58.7±12.3 years; range 18 to 65 years) who underwent DRG PRF plus TFESI (Group 2) between February 2021 and June 2022 were enrolled in the retrospective study. A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain severity. Patients in both groups were evaluated before treatment and at four weeks and six months after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-week and six-month VAS scores were significantly lower than the baseline VAS scores in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the VAS scores at baseline, four weeks, and six months. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the rate of pain reduction of 50% or more at either measurement point. The presence or absence of a previous lumbar surgery had no effect on achieving a significant decrease in pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although DRG PRF and TFESI are easy to apply together, adding corticosteroids to DRG PRF treatment for patients with chronic radicular pain did not improve long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"70 3\",\"pages\":\"390-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639494/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.13479\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.13479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在比较背根神经节(DRG)脉冲射频(PRF)和DRG PRF加经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)对慢性腰骶根性疼痛患者的治疗效果:在2021年2月至2022年6月期间,81名患者(39名男性,42名女性;平均年龄:57.5±11.9岁;18至65岁不等)接受了DRG PRF(第1组),59名患者(34名男性,25名女性;平均年龄:58.7±12.3岁;18至65岁不等)接受了DRG PRF加TFESI(第2组)。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛严重程度。两组患者均在治疗前、治疗后四周和六个月接受了评估:结果:两组患者在治疗后四周和六个月的 VAS 评分均明显低于基线 VAS 评分。两组患者在基线、四周和六个月的 VAS 评分无明显差异。两组患者在任何一个测量点的疼痛减轻率达到或超过 50%,均无明显差异。曾否进行过腰部手术对疼痛是否明显减轻没有影响:结论:虽然 DRG PRF 和 TFESI 很容易同时使用,但在 DRG PRF 治疗慢性根性疼痛患者的同时使用皮质类固醇并不能改善长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does transforaminal epidural steroid injection added to dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment increase efficacy?

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and DRG PRF plus transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain.

Patients and methods: Eighty-one patients (39 males, 42 females; mean age: 57.5±11.9 years; range 18 to 65 years) who underwent DRG PRF (Group 1) and 59 patients (34 males, 25 females; mean age: 58.7±12.3 years; range 18 to 65 years) who underwent DRG PRF plus TFESI (Group 2) between February 2021 and June 2022 were enrolled in the retrospective study. A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain severity. Patients in both groups were evaluated before treatment and at four weeks and six months after treatment.

Results: The four-week and six-month VAS scores were significantly lower than the baseline VAS scores in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the VAS scores at baseline, four weeks, and six months. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the rate of pain reduction of 50% or more at either measurement point. The presence or absence of a previous lumbar surgery had no effect on achieving a significant decrease in pain.

Conclusion: Although DRG PRF and TFESI are easy to apply together, adding corticosteroids to DRG PRF treatment for patients with chronic radicular pain did not improve long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
期刊最新文献
Robot-assisted gait training in stroke. Short-term effectiveness of epidermis dermis fascia kinesiotaping technique in myofascial pain syndrome on upper trapezius: A multi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical study. Comparison of the effect of separate and simultaneous application of Tecar therapy and low-level laser therapy on the neurological symptoms of type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy of lower limbs. Effect of low-frequency repetitive magnetic transcranial stimulation in hemichorea-hemiballismus with ipsilateral basal ganglia hemorrhage: A case report. Effectiveness of static, dynamic and combined dry needling techniques in the management of myofascial pain syndrome: A three-group study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1