采用自适应 k 空间重排技术的呼吸门控四维血流磁共振成像在健康对照组和主动脉夹层中的表现:再现性以及与二维相衬磁共振成像的一致性。

Qingdi Wang, Xiaojing Guo, Emma Hornsey, Lucy McKenna, Leonid Churilov, Mark Brooks, George Matalanis, Jason Chuen, Eric Poon, Daniel Staeb, Ning Jin, Andrew Ooi, Ruth P Lim
{"title":"采用自适应 k 空间重排技术的呼吸门控四维血流磁共振成像在健康对照组和主动脉夹层中的表现:再现性以及与二维相衬磁共振成像的一致性。","authors":"Qingdi Wang, Xiaojing Guo, Emma Hornsey, Lucy McKenna, Leonid Churilov, Mark Brooks, George Matalanis, Jason Chuen, Eric Poon, Daniel Staeb, Ning Jin, Andrew Ooi, Ruth P Lim","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03298-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequence with respiratory-controlled adaptive k-space reordering (ReCAR-4DPC) offers potential benefits of improved scan efficiency and motion robustness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of flow measurement using this technique and to compare hemodynamic metrics obtained to two-dimensional phase contrast MRI (2DPC)-derived metrics of the thoracic aorta. ReCAR-4DPC was performed with identical scan parameters in 15 healthy volunteers (6M,9F, mean [range] 37 [23-47] years) and 11 patients with thoracic aortic dissection (6M,5F, 56 [31-81] years) and acquisition time was recorded. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), average flow (AF) and net forward volume (NFV) were quantified by two readers for ReCAR-4DPC at ascending, descending and diaphragmatic aorta levels. Reference standard 2DPC measurements at the same levels were performed by a separate experienced cardiovascular radiologist. ReCAR-4DPC intra-reader agreement, inter-reader agreement, inter-scan repeatability and concordance with 2DPC-derived metrics (all segments combined) were evaluated with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) and reduced major axis regression. The overall average ± SD MRI acquisition time of all subjects was 11:59 ± 3:57 min, with shorter average times (9:37 ± 1:57 min) in healthy volunteers compared to patients (15:13 ± 3:44 min). There was near-perfect intra-reader, inter-reader and inter-scan concordance (LCCC for all metrics > 0.97, > 0.98 and > 0.92 respectively) for ReCAR-4DPC. Concordance with 2DPC was also high (LCCC all > 0.89), with overall minimally lower PSV, AF and NFV values derived from ReCAR-4DPC compared to reference 2DPC derived metrics. ReCAR-4DPC is a reproducible and relatively fast approach for comprehensive measurement of thoracic aortic flow metrics, with robust correlation to conventional 2DPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of respiratory gated 4D flow MRI with adaptive k-space reordering in healthy controls and aortic dissection: reproducibility and agreement with 2D phase contrast MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Qingdi Wang, Xiaojing Guo, Emma Hornsey, Lucy McKenna, Leonid Churilov, Mark Brooks, George Matalanis, Jason Chuen, Eric Poon, Daniel Staeb, Ning Jin, Andrew Ooi, Ruth P Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-024-03298-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequence with respiratory-controlled adaptive k-space reordering (ReCAR-4DPC) offers potential benefits of improved scan efficiency and motion robustness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of flow measurement using this technique and to compare hemodynamic metrics obtained to two-dimensional phase contrast MRI (2DPC)-derived metrics of the thoracic aorta. ReCAR-4DPC was performed with identical scan parameters in 15 healthy volunteers (6M,9F, mean [range] 37 [23-47] years) and 11 patients with thoracic aortic dissection (6M,5F, 56 [31-81] years) and acquisition time was recorded. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), average flow (AF) and net forward volume (NFV) were quantified by two readers for ReCAR-4DPC at ascending, descending and diaphragmatic aorta levels. Reference standard 2DPC measurements at the same levels were performed by a separate experienced cardiovascular radiologist. ReCAR-4DPC intra-reader agreement, inter-reader agreement, inter-scan repeatability and concordance with 2DPC-derived metrics (all segments combined) were evaluated with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) and reduced major axis regression. The overall average ± SD MRI acquisition time of all subjects was 11:59 ± 3:57 min, with shorter average times (9:37 ± 1:57 min) in healthy volunteers compared to patients (15:13 ± 3:44 min). There was near-perfect intra-reader, inter-reader and inter-scan concordance (LCCC for all metrics > 0.97, > 0.98 and > 0.92 respectively) for ReCAR-4DPC. Concordance with 2DPC was also high (LCCC all > 0.89), with overall minimally lower PSV, AF and NFV values derived from ReCAR-4DPC compared to reference 2DPC derived metrics. ReCAR-4DPC is a reproducible and relatively fast approach for comprehensive measurement of thoracic aortic flow metrics, with robust correlation to conventional 2DPC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03298-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03298-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

四维相位对比磁共振成像序列具有呼吸控制自适应 k 空间重新排序(ReCAR-4DPC)的潜在优势,可提高扫描效率和运动鲁棒性。本研究旨在评估使用该技术测量血流的可重复性,并将获得的血流动力学指标与二维相位对比磁共振成像(2DPC)得出的胸主动脉指标进行比较。对 15 名健康志愿者(6 名男性,9 名女性,平均[范围] 37 [23-47] 岁)和 11 名胸主动脉夹层患者(6 名男性,5 名女性,平均[范围] 56 [31-81] 岁)使用相同的扫描参数进行了 ReCAR-4DPC 扫描,并记录了采集时间。ReCAR-4DPC 的升主动脉、降主动脉和膈主动脉水平的峰值收缩速度(PSV)、平均流量(AF)和净前向容积(NFV)由两名读数员进行量化。由另一名经验丰富的心血管放射科医生在相同层面进行参考标准 2DPC 测量。使用林氏一致性相关系数(LCCC)和还原主轴回归法评估了 ReCAR-4DPC 的读片机内一致性、读片机间一致性、扫描间重复性以及与 2DPC 派生指标(所有节段合并)的一致性。所有受试者的总体平均(± SD)磁共振成像采集时间为 11:59 ± 3:57 分钟,与患者(15:13 ± 3:44 分钟)相比,健康志愿者的平均时间更短(9:37 ± 1:57 分钟)。ReCAR-4DPC 的读取器内、读取器间和扫描间一致性接近完美(所有指标的 LCCC 分别大于 0.97、大于 0.98 和大于 0.92)。与 2DPC 的一致性也很高(LCCC 均大于 0.89),与参考 2DPC 得出的指标相比,ReCAR-4DPC 得出的 PSV、AF 和 NFV 值总体上略低。ReCAR-4DPC 是一种可重复、相对快速的胸主动脉血流指标综合测量方法,与传统的 2DPC 具有很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of respiratory gated 4D flow MRI with adaptive k-space reordering in healthy controls and aortic dissection: reproducibility and agreement with 2D phase contrast MRI.

A four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequence with respiratory-controlled adaptive k-space reordering (ReCAR-4DPC) offers potential benefits of improved scan efficiency and motion robustness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of flow measurement using this technique and to compare hemodynamic metrics obtained to two-dimensional phase contrast MRI (2DPC)-derived metrics of the thoracic aorta. ReCAR-4DPC was performed with identical scan parameters in 15 healthy volunteers (6M,9F, mean [range] 37 [23-47] years) and 11 patients with thoracic aortic dissection (6M,5F, 56 [31-81] years) and acquisition time was recorded. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), average flow (AF) and net forward volume (NFV) were quantified by two readers for ReCAR-4DPC at ascending, descending and diaphragmatic aorta levels. Reference standard 2DPC measurements at the same levels were performed by a separate experienced cardiovascular radiologist. ReCAR-4DPC intra-reader agreement, inter-reader agreement, inter-scan repeatability and concordance with 2DPC-derived metrics (all segments combined) were evaluated with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) and reduced major axis regression. The overall average ± SD MRI acquisition time of all subjects was 11:59 ± 3:57 min, with shorter average times (9:37 ± 1:57 min) in healthy volunteers compared to patients (15:13 ± 3:44 min). There was near-perfect intra-reader, inter-reader and inter-scan concordance (LCCC for all metrics > 0.97, > 0.98 and > 0.92 respectively) for ReCAR-4DPC. Concordance with 2DPC was also high (LCCC all > 0.89), with overall minimally lower PSV, AF and NFV values derived from ReCAR-4DPC compared to reference 2DPC derived metrics. ReCAR-4DPC is a reproducible and relatively fast approach for comprehensive measurement of thoracic aortic flow metrics, with robust correlation to conventional 2DPC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and structure by ultrasound radiomics in acute and chronic coronary patients. Redundant and aneurysmal interatrial septum motion: a commentary on anatomical factors and clinical implications. Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR. When a common sore throat unmasks a rare disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1