咨询为改进变异分类中功能证据使用的策略提供信息。

Rehan M Villani, Bronwyn Terrill, Emma Tudini, Maddison E McKenzie, Corrina C Cliffe, Christopher N Hahn, Ben Lundie, Tessa Mattiske, Ebony Matotek, Abbye E McEwen, Sarah L Nickerson, James Breen, Douglas M Fowler, John Christodoulou, Lea Starita, Alan F Rubin, Amanda B Spurdle
{"title":"咨询为改进变异分类中功能证据使用的策略提供信息。","authors":"Rehan M Villani, Bronwyn Terrill, Emma Tudini, Maddison E McKenzie, Corrina C Cliffe, Christopher N Hahn, Ben Lundie, Tessa Mattiske, Ebony Matotek, Abbye E McEwen, Sarah L Nickerson, James Breen, Douglas M Fowler, John Christodoulou, Lea Starita, Alan F Rubin, Amanda B Spurdle","doi":"10.1101/2024.12.04.24318523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine if a variant identified by diagnostic genetic testing is causal for disease, applied genetics professionals evaluate all available evidence to assign a clinical classification. Experimental assay data can provide strong functional evidence for or against pathogenicity in variant classification, but appears to be underutilised. We surveyed genetic diagnostic professionals in Australasia to assess their application of functional evidence in clinical practice. Results indicated that survey respondents are not confident to apply functional evidence, mainly due to uncertainty around practice recommendations. Respondents also identified need for support resources, educational opportunities, and in particular requested expert recommendations and updated practice guidelines to improve translation of experimental data to curation evidence. As an initial step, we have collated a list of functional assays recommended by 19 ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels as a source of international expert opinion on functional evidence evaluation. Additional support resources for diagnostic practice are in development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consultation informs strategies to improve functional evidence use in variant classification.\",\"authors\":\"Rehan M Villani, Bronwyn Terrill, Emma Tudini, Maddison E McKenzie, Corrina C Cliffe, Christopher N Hahn, Ben Lundie, Tessa Mattiske, Ebony Matotek, Abbye E McEwen, Sarah L Nickerson, James Breen, Douglas M Fowler, John Christodoulou, Lea Starita, Alan F Rubin, Amanda B Spurdle\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.12.04.24318523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine if a variant identified by diagnostic genetic testing is causal for disease, applied genetics professionals evaluate all available evidence to assign a clinical classification. Experimental assay data can provide strong functional evidence for or against pathogenicity in variant classification, but appears to be underutilised. We surveyed genetic diagnostic professionals in Australasia to assess their application of functional evidence in clinical practice. Results indicated that survey respondents are not confident to apply functional evidence, mainly due to uncertainty around practice recommendations. Respondents also identified need for support resources, educational opportunities, and in particular requested expert recommendations and updated practice guidelines to improve translation of experimental data to curation evidence. As an initial step, we have collated a list of functional assays recommended by 19 ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels as a source of international expert opinion on functional evidence evaluation. Additional support resources for diagnostic practice are in development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.04.24318523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.04.24318523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了确定通过基因诊断检测发现的变异体是否是疾病的致病因素,应用遗传学专业人员会评估所有可用的证据,以进行临床分类。实验检测数据可为变异分类中的致病性提供有力的功能证据,但似乎未得到充分利用。我们对澳大拉西亚的遗传诊断专业人员进行了调查,以评估他们在临床实践中对功能证据的应用。结果显示,调查对象对应用功能证据缺乏信心,主要原因是实践建议的不确定性。受访者还指出需要支持资源和教育机会,特别是需要专家建议和更新实践指南,以改善将实验数据转化为整理证据的工作。作为第一步,我们整理了一份由 19 个 ClinGen 变异库专家小组推荐的功能检测列表,作为功能证据评估的国际专家意见来源。用于诊断实践的其他支持资源正在开发中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consultation informs strategies to improve functional evidence use in variant classification.

To determine if a variant identified by diagnostic genetic testing is causal for disease, applied genetics professionals evaluate all available evidence to assign a clinical classification. Experimental assay data can provide strong functional evidence for or against pathogenicity in variant classification, but appears to be underutilised. We surveyed genetic diagnostic professionals in Australasia to assess their application of functional evidence in clinical practice. Results indicated that survey respondents are not confident to apply functional evidence, mainly due to uncertainty around practice recommendations. Respondents also identified need for support resources, educational opportunities, and in particular requested expert recommendations and updated practice guidelines to improve translation of experimental data to curation evidence. As an initial step, we have collated a list of functional assays recommended by 19 ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels as a source of international expert opinion on functional evidence evaluation. Additional support resources for diagnostic practice are in development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Direct Prosthesis Force Control with Tactile Feedback May Connect with the Internal Model. Effects of commonly used antibiotics on children's developing gut microbiomes and resistomes in peri-urban Lima, Peru. Greater lesion damage is bidirectionally related with accelerated brain aging after stroke. Pallidal and motor cortical interactions determine gait initiation dynamics in Parkinson's disease. Prioritizing Parkinson's disease risk genes in genome-wide association loci.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1