男性体育锻炼与受孕率的前瞻性研究

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1093/humrep/deae275
Lauren A Wise, Tanran R Wang, Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen, Dmitrii Krivorotko, Ellen M Mikkelsen, Andrea S Kuriyama, Anne Sofie Dam Laursen, Marie Dahl Jørgensen, Michael L Eisenberg, Kenneth J Rothman, Henrik Toft Sorensen, Elizabeth E Hatch
{"title":"男性体育锻炼与受孕率的前瞻性研究","authors":"Lauren A Wise, Tanran R Wang, Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen, Dmitrii Krivorotko, Ellen M Mikkelsen, Andrea S Kuriyama, Anne Sofie Dam Laursen, Marie Dahl Jørgensen, Michael L Eisenberg, Kenneth J Rothman, Henrik Toft Sorensen, Elizabeth E Hatch","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deae275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY QUESTION To what extent is male physical activity (PA) associated with fecundability (per-cycle probability of conception)? SUMMARY ANSWER Preconception levels of vigorous, moderate, or total PA were not consistently associated with fecundability across Danish and North American cohorts, but there was suggestive evidence that bicycling with a ‘soft, comfort seat’ was associated with reduced fecundability in both cohorts, especially among males with greater BMI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Among males, some studies indicate that moderate PA might improve fertility, whereas vigorous PA, especially bicycling, might be detrimental. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We assessed the association between male PA and fecundability among couples participating in two preconception cohort studies: SnartForaeldre.dk (SF) in Denmark (2011–2023) and Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) in North America (2013–2024). We restricted analyses to 4921 males (1088 in SF and 3833 in PRESTO) who had been trying to conceive with their partners for ≤6 cycles at enrollment. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS At baseline, male partners reported data on medical history, lifestyle, behavioral, anthropometric factors, and their PA levels using different instruments [SF: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); PRESTO: average annual hours/week and type]. Both cohorts included additional questions on bicycling (frequency, bike seat type). After linking couple data at baseline, the female partner completed follow-up questionnaires to update their pregnancy status every 8 weeks for 12 months or until conception, whichever occurred first. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% CIs, controlling for potential confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Average hours/week of vigorous PA, moderate PA, and total metabolic equivalents of task were generally inversely associated with fecundability in SF, but not PRESTO. While there was little association with bicycling overall in either cohort, we observed an inverse association for bicycling using a ‘soft, comfort seat’ (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.53–1.05; PRESTO: FR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62–1.07) but not a ‘hard, racing-style seat’ (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.95–1.41; PRESTO: FR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89–1.28). Among males with BMI ≥25 kg/m2, associations with bicycling using a ‘soft, comfort seat’ were similar or stronger (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.45–1.24; PRESTO: FR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.52–1.03). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Misclassification of PA was likely the most important study limitation because we ascertained PA only once at enrollment using different instruments in each cohort. We would expect misclassification of PA to be non-differential given the prospective study design. Additional weaknesses include the narrow range of PA levels evaluated, reduced precision when stratifying the data by selected covariates, and limited generalizability due to the large percentage of non-Hispanic White participants and restriction of the cohort to pregnancy planners. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Further evaluation of the potential deleterious effects of bicycling on male fertility, with additional consideration of the influence of bike seat type and BMI, may be warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by NICHD Grants R21-HD072326, R01-HD086742, R01 HD105863, and R03-HD094117. These funding bodies had no involvement in the: study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or decision to submit the article for publication. L.A.W. serves as a paid consultant for AbbVie, Inc. and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. She also receives in-kind donations for primary data collection in Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) from Swiss Precision Diagnostics (home pregnancy tests) and Kindara.com (fertility apps). All of these relationships are for work unrelated to this manuscript. M.L.E. is an advisor for and holds stock in Legacy, Doveras, VSeat, Hannah, Illumicell, HisTurn, & Next. The other authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective study of male physical activity and fecundability\",\"authors\":\"Lauren A Wise, Tanran R Wang, Sinna Pilgaard Ulrichsen, Dmitrii Krivorotko, Ellen M Mikkelsen, Andrea S Kuriyama, Anne Sofie Dam Laursen, Marie Dahl Jørgensen, Michael L Eisenberg, Kenneth J Rothman, Henrik Toft Sorensen, Elizabeth E Hatch\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/humrep/deae275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STUDY QUESTION To what extent is male physical activity (PA) associated with fecundability (per-cycle probability of conception)? SUMMARY ANSWER Preconception levels of vigorous, moderate, or total PA were not consistently associated with fecundability across Danish and North American cohorts, but there was suggestive evidence that bicycling with a ‘soft, comfort seat’ was associated with reduced fecundability in both cohorts, especially among males with greater BMI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Among males, some studies indicate that moderate PA might improve fertility, whereas vigorous PA, especially bicycling, might be detrimental. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We assessed the association between male PA and fecundability among couples participating in two preconception cohort studies: SnartForaeldre.dk (SF) in Denmark (2011–2023) and Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) in North America (2013–2024). We restricted analyses to 4921 males (1088 in SF and 3833 in PRESTO) who had been trying to conceive with their partners for ≤6 cycles at enrollment. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS At baseline, male partners reported data on medical history, lifestyle, behavioral, anthropometric factors, and their PA levels using different instruments [SF: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); PRESTO: average annual hours/week and type]. Both cohorts included additional questions on bicycling (frequency, bike seat type). After linking couple data at baseline, the female partner completed follow-up questionnaires to update their pregnancy status every 8 weeks for 12 months or until conception, whichever occurred first. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% CIs, controlling for potential confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Average hours/week of vigorous PA, moderate PA, and total metabolic equivalents of task were generally inversely associated with fecundability in SF, but not PRESTO. While there was little association with bicycling overall in either cohort, we observed an inverse association for bicycling using a ‘soft, comfort seat’ (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.53–1.05; PRESTO: FR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62–1.07) but not a ‘hard, racing-style seat’ (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.95–1.41; PRESTO: FR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89–1.28). Among males with BMI ≥25 kg/m2, associations with bicycling using a ‘soft, comfort seat’ were similar or stronger (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.45–1.24; PRESTO: FR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.52–1.03). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Misclassification of PA was likely the most important study limitation because we ascertained PA only once at enrollment using different instruments in each cohort. We would expect misclassification of PA to be non-differential given the prospective study design. Additional weaknesses include the narrow range of PA levels evaluated, reduced precision when stratifying the data by selected covariates, and limited generalizability due to the large percentage of non-Hispanic White participants and restriction of the cohort to pregnancy planners. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Further evaluation of the potential deleterious effects of bicycling on male fertility, with additional consideration of the influence of bike seat type and BMI, may be warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by NICHD Grants R21-HD072326, R01-HD086742, R01 HD105863, and R03-HD094117. These funding bodies had no involvement in the: study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or decision to submit the article for publication. L.A.W. serves as a paid consultant for AbbVie, Inc. and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. She also receives in-kind donations for primary data collection in Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) from Swiss Precision Diagnostics (home pregnancy tests) and Kindara.com (fertility apps). All of these relationships are for work unrelated to this manuscript. M.L.E. is an advisor for and holds stock in Legacy, Doveras, VSeat, Hannah, Illumicell, HisTurn, & Next. The other authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae275\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae275","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题 男性体力活动(PA)在多大程度上与受孕率(每周期受孕概率)有关?在丹麦和北美的队列中,受孕前的剧烈、适度或总体体力活动水平与受孕率的关系并不一致,但有提示性证据表明,在这两个队列中,骑 "柔软舒适座椅 "的自行车与受孕率降低有关,尤其是在体重指数(BMI)较大的男性中。在男性中,一些研究表明,适度的体育锻炼可能会提高生育能力,而剧烈的体育锻炼,尤其是骑自行车,可能会对生育能力不利。研究设计、规模、持续时间 我们评估了参与两项孕前队列研究的夫妇中男性运动量与受孕率之间的关系:这两项研究分别是丹麦的 SnartForaeldre.dk(SF)(2011-2023 年)和北美的在线妊娠研究(PRESTO)(2013-2024 年)。我们将分析对象限定为 4921 名男性(SF 为 1088 名,PRESTO 为 3833 名),这些男性在注册时已与伴侣尝试受孕≤6 个周期。参与者/材料、地点、方法 在基线时,男性伴侣使用不同的工具报告有关病史、生活方式、行为、人体测量因素及其 PA 水平的数据[SF:国际体力活动问卷 (IPAQ);PRESTO:年平均小时/周和类型]。两个队列都包括有关骑自行车(频率、自行车座椅类型)的附加问题。在连接基线时的夫妻数据后,女性伴侣每 8 周填写一次随访问卷,以更新其怀孕状况,持续 12 个月或直到受孕,以先发生者为准。在控制潜在混杂因素的情况下,我们使用比例概率回归模型来估算受孕率(FRs)和 95% CIs。主要结果和偶然性的作用 在 SF 中,每周平均剧烈运动时间、中等运动时间和任务总代谢当量一般与受孕率成反比,但在 PRESTO 中并非如此。虽然在这两个队列中,骑自行车与受孕率的总体关系不大,但我们观察到,使用 "柔软舒适的座椅 "骑自行车与受孕率呈反比关系(≥3 小时/周 vs 0 小时/周):SF:FR = 0.75,95% CI:0.53-1.05;PRESTO:FR = 0.81,95% CI:0.62-1.07),但与 "硬质赛车式座椅 "无关(≥3 vs 0 小时/周:SF:FR = 1.16,95% CI:0.62-1.07):SF:FR = 1.16,95% CI:0.95-1.41;Presto:FR = 1.06,95% CI:0.89-1.28)。在体重指数(BMI)≥25 kg/m2 的男性中,使用 "柔软舒适的座椅 "与骑自行车的相关性相似或更强(≥3 小时 vs 0 小时/周:SF:FR = 0.75,95% CI:0.45-1.24;Presto:FR = 0.73,95% CI:0.52-1.03)。局限性、注意事项 PA 的误分类可能是最重要的研究局限性,因为我们只在每个队列中使用不同的工具在注册时确定 PA 一次。鉴于前瞻性研究的设计,我们预计 PA 的误分类是无差别的。其他不足之处还包括:所评估的 PA 水平范围较窄;根据选定的协变量对数据进行分层时,精度有所降低;由于非西班牙裔白人参与者所占比例较大,且队列仅限于怀孕计划者,因此可推广性有限。研究结果的广泛意义 可能有必要进一步评估骑自行车对男性生育能力的潜在有害影响,并进一步考虑自行车座椅类型和体重指数的影响。研究经费/合作利益 本研究得到了美国国家卫生与健康研究所(NICHD)R21-HD072326、R01-HD086742、R01 HD105863 和 R03-HD094117 号基金的资助。这些资助机构没有参与研究设计、数据收集、分析和解释、报告撰写或文章发表的决定。L.A.W. 是艾伯维公司(AbbVie, Inc.她还接受了瑞士精密诊断公司(家用妊娠测试)和 Kindara.com(生育应用程序)的实物捐赠,用于在线妊娠研究(PRESTO)的原始数据收集。所有这些关系均用于与本手稿无关的工作。M.L.E.是Legacy、Doveras、VSeat、Hannah、Illumicell、HisTurn和Next的顾问,并持有这些公司的股票。其他作者无利益冲突需要声明。试验注册号为 n/a。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A prospective study of male physical activity and fecundability
STUDY QUESTION To what extent is male physical activity (PA) associated with fecundability (per-cycle probability of conception)? SUMMARY ANSWER Preconception levels of vigorous, moderate, or total PA were not consistently associated with fecundability across Danish and North American cohorts, but there was suggestive evidence that bicycling with a ‘soft, comfort seat’ was associated with reduced fecundability in both cohorts, especially among males with greater BMI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Among males, some studies indicate that moderate PA might improve fertility, whereas vigorous PA, especially bicycling, might be detrimental. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We assessed the association between male PA and fecundability among couples participating in two preconception cohort studies: SnartForaeldre.dk (SF) in Denmark (2011–2023) and Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) in North America (2013–2024). We restricted analyses to 4921 males (1088 in SF and 3833 in PRESTO) who had been trying to conceive with their partners for ≤6 cycles at enrollment. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS At baseline, male partners reported data on medical history, lifestyle, behavioral, anthropometric factors, and their PA levels using different instruments [SF: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); PRESTO: average annual hours/week and type]. Both cohorts included additional questions on bicycling (frequency, bike seat type). After linking couple data at baseline, the female partner completed follow-up questionnaires to update their pregnancy status every 8 weeks for 12 months or until conception, whichever occurred first. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% CIs, controlling for potential confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Average hours/week of vigorous PA, moderate PA, and total metabolic equivalents of task were generally inversely associated with fecundability in SF, but not PRESTO. While there was little association with bicycling overall in either cohort, we observed an inverse association for bicycling using a ‘soft, comfort seat’ (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.53–1.05; PRESTO: FR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62–1.07) but not a ‘hard, racing-style seat’ (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.95–1.41; PRESTO: FR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89–1.28). Among males with BMI ≥25 kg/m2, associations with bicycling using a ‘soft, comfort seat’ were similar or stronger (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.45–1.24; PRESTO: FR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.52–1.03). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Misclassification of PA was likely the most important study limitation because we ascertained PA only once at enrollment using different instruments in each cohort. We would expect misclassification of PA to be non-differential given the prospective study design. Additional weaknesses include the narrow range of PA levels evaluated, reduced precision when stratifying the data by selected covariates, and limited generalizability due to the large percentage of non-Hispanic White participants and restriction of the cohort to pregnancy planners. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Further evaluation of the potential deleterious effects of bicycling on male fertility, with additional consideration of the influence of bike seat type and BMI, may be warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by NICHD Grants R21-HD072326, R01-HD086742, R01 HD105863, and R03-HD094117. These funding bodies had no involvement in the: study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or decision to submit the article for publication. L.A.W. serves as a paid consultant for AbbVie, Inc. and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. She also receives in-kind donations for primary data collection in Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) from Swiss Precision Diagnostics (home pregnancy tests) and Kindara.com (fertility apps). All of these relationships are for work unrelated to this manuscript. M.L.E. is an advisor for and holds stock in Legacy, Doveras, VSeat, Hannah, Illumicell, HisTurn, & Next. The other authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
期刊最新文献
Ethical considerations on surrogacy†. Recurrent implantation failure: science or fiction? A randomized controlled trial comparing embryo vitrification with slush nitrogen to liquid nitrogen in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer: embryology and clinical outcomes Beyond the disclosure debate in donor-conception: how do we help families to discuss origin stories with their children? Endometriosis and risk of depression among oral contraceptive users: a pooled analysis of cohort studies from 13 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1