时间型与慢性神经性疼痛敏感性之间的关系:一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心、横断面研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Michael Kim, Yuri C Martins, Kishan Patel, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Mohab Ibrahim, Vasudha Goel, Amol M Patwardhan, Sejal Jain
{"title":"时间型与慢性神经性疼痛敏感性之间的关系:一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心、横断面研究。","authors":"Michael Kim, Yuri C Martins, Kishan Patel, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Mohab Ibrahim, Vasudha Goel, Amol M Patwardhan, Sejal Jain","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronotype defines an organism's biological preference for timing of activity and sleep. Being a morning chronotype (i.e., tending to wake up early and go to bed earlier at night) is associated with protection against chronic musculoskeletal pain and headaches, but the relationship between chronotype and neuropathic pain sensitivity remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this pilot study was to explore the relationship among chronotype, neuropathic pain sensitivity, and pain interference in patients with chronic neuropathic pain disorders.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, single-center, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patients were recruited from pain management clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) was used to evaluate circadian typology. Linear mixed-effects models, principal component analysis, and principal component regression were used to determine the predictors of pain intensity and pain interference evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) scores, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 38 adults who had at least one documented chronic neuropathic pain diagnosis. Morning-chronotype patients reported higher NRS scores over time and lower PROMIS-PI t-scores than did intermediate chronotypes. MEQ, depression, risk of sleep apnea, sleep quality, and body mass index (BMI) were all significant independent predictors of average NRS scores and PROMIS-PI t-scores.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The population was small and homogeneously white, with an average age of 57 years. However, this population was representative of our pain clinic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morning chronotypes are more sensitive to chronic neuropathic pain, reporting higher pain scores than do intermediate chronotypes. However, in this study, morning chronotypes were more resistant to neuropathic pain interference, suggesting that they may experience less disturbance of their physical, mental, and social activities than intermediate chronotypes. Further, larger studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"27 10","pages":"E1097-E1104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Chronotype and Chronic Neuropathic Pain Sensitivity: A Pilot Prospective, Observational, Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Kim, Yuri C Martins, Kishan Patel, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Mohab Ibrahim, Vasudha Goel, Amol M Patwardhan, Sejal Jain\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronotype defines an organism's biological preference for timing of activity and sleep. Being a morning chronotype (i.e., tending to wake up early and go to bed earlier at night) is associated with protection against chronic musculoskeletal pain and headaches, but the relationship between chronotype and neuropathic pain sensitivity remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this pilot study was to explore the relationship among chronotype, neuropathic pain sensitivity, and pain interference in patients with chronic neuropathic pain disorders.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, single-center, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patients were recruited from pain management clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) was used to evaluate circadian typology. Linear mixed-effects models, principal component analysis, and principal component regression were used to determine the predictors of pain intensity and pain interference evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) scores, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 38 adults who had at least one documented chronic neuropathic pain diagnosis. Morning-chronotype patients reported higher NRS scores over time and lower PROMIS-PI t-scores than did intermediate chronotypes. MEQ, depression, risk of sleep apnea, sleep quality, and body mass index (BMI) were all significant independent predictors of average NRS scores and PROMIS-PI t-scores.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The population was small and homogeneously white, with an average age of 57 years. However, this population was representative of our pain clinic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morning chronotypes are more sensitive to chronic neuropathic pain, reporting higher pain scores than do intermediate chronotypes. However, in this study, morning chronotypes were more resistant to neuropathic pain interference, suggesting that they may experience less disturbance of their physical, mental, and social activities than intermediate chronotypes. Further, larger studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"E1097-E1104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物钟定义了生物体对活动和睡眠时间的生物学偏好。早起型睡眠类型(即,倾向于早起,晚上早睡)与预防慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和头痛有关,但睡眠类型与神经性疼痛敏感性之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:本初步研究的目的是探讨慢性神经性疼痛障碍患者的时间型、神经性疼痛敏感性和疼痛干扰之间的关系。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心、横断面研究。环境:患者从疼痛管理诊所招募。方法:采用早晚性问卷(MEQ)对昼夜节律类型进行评价。采用线性混合效应模型、主成分分析和主成分回归来确定疼痛强度和疼痛干扰的预测因子,分别由数字评定量表(NRS)和患者报告结果测量信息系统疼痛干扰(promisi - pi)评分评估。结果:我们分析了38名至少有一种慢性神经性疼痛诊断的成年人。与中间时间型患者相比,晨型患者报告的NRS评分随时间推移较高,promise - pi t评分较低。MEQ、抑郁、睡眠呼吸暂停风险、睡眠质量和体重指数(BMI)均为NRS平均评分和promise - pi t评分的显著独立预测因子。局限性:研究人群数量少且均为白人,平均年龄为57岁。然而,这个人群是我们疼痛诊所的代表。结论:晨型睡眠者对慢性神经性疼痛更敏感,报告的疼痛评分高于中级睡眠者。然而,在这项研究中,晨型睡眠者对神经性疼痛干扰的抵抗力更强,这表明晨型睡眠者的身体、精神和社交活动受到的干扰可能比中型睡眠者要少。此外,还需要更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Chronotype and Chronic Neuropathic Pain Sensitivity: A Pilot Prospective, Observational, Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Chronotype defines an organism's biological preference for timing of activity and sleep. Being a morning chronotype (i.e., tending to wake up early and go to bed earlier at night) is associated with protection against chronic musculoskeletal pain and headaches, but the relationship between chronotype and neuropathic pain sensitivity remains unclear.

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to explore the relationship among chronotype, neuropathic pain sensitivity, and pain interference in patients with chronic neuropathic pain disorders.

Study design: This was a prospective, observational, single-center, cross-sectional study.

Setting: Patients were recruited from pain management clinics.

Methods: The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) was used to evaluate circadian typology. Linear mixed-effects models, principal component analysis, and principal component regression were used to determine the predictors of pain intensity and pain interference evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) scores, respectively.

Results: We analyzed 38 adults who had at least one documented chronic neuropathic pain diagnosis. Morning-chronotype patients reported higher NRS scores over time and lower PROMIS-PI t-scores than did intermediate chronotypes. MEQ, depression, risk of sleep apnea, sleep quality, and body mass index (BMI) were all significant independent predictors of average NRS scores and PROMIS-PI t-scores.

Limitations: The population was small and homogeneously white, with an average age of 57 years. However, this population was representative of our pain clinic.

Conclusions: Morning chronotypes are more sensitive to chronic neuropathic pain, reporting higher pain scores than do intermediate chronotypes. However, in this study, morning chronotypes were more resistant to neuropathic pain interference, suggesting that they may experience less disturbance of their physical, mental, and social activities than intermediate chronotypes. Further, larger studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
期刊最新文献
2024 Indices. A 24% Decline in the Utilization of Epidural Procedure Visits for Chronic Spinal Pain Management in the Medicare Population from 2019 to 2022: Updated Analysis of the Effect of Multiple Factors. Association Between Chronotype and Chronic Neuropathic Pain Sensitivity: A Pilot Prospective, Observational, Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical Response to Joint Infiltration With Bone Marrow Aspirate in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Single-arm Meta-analysis. Comparative Study Between the Analgesic Effect of Prednisolone and Pregabalin in Managing Post Dural Puncture Headache After Lower Limb Surgeries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1