Diego José Gómez, Santiago Ávila Posada, Nadia Gabotto, Gonzalo Viollaz, Álvaro Muratore, Nicolás Nohad Altamirano, Daniel Moya
{"title":"肱二头肌长头自体移植物与跟腱异体移植物的肩关节上囊重建术：两年对比研究","authors":"Diego José Gómez, Santiago Ávila Posada, Nadia Gabotto, Gonzalo Viollaz, Álvaro Muratore, Nicolás Nohad Altamirano, Daniel Moya","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrospectively evaluate the clinical-functional outcomes, healing rates, complications, and surgical time in patients treated with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using long head of the biceps autograft (LHB) and Achilles allograft (AA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 24 patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, treated with SCR. Two treatment groups were formed: one with 12 cases using AA and another with 12 cases using LHB. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SSV was 73.7 ± 25.3 vs. 86.0 ± 8.7 (p=0.26), the Constant score was 76.8 ± 20.1 vs. 83.7 ± 4.6 (p=0.12), and the VAS was 1.6 ± 2.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 (p=0.9) for the LHB and AA groups, respectively. Tendon healing was 66.7% in AA and 100% in LHB (p=0.001). Complications were 50% in AA and 0% in LHB. The average surgical time was 127.7 ± 37.6 minutes for AA and 84.3 ± 14.3 minutes for LHB (p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SCR with LHB showed better results in terms of tendon healing, fewer complications, and reduced surgical time compared to the use of AA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder with Long Head of Biceps Autograft vs. Achilles Tendon Allograft: A 2-Year Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Diego José Gómez, Santiago Ávila Posada, Nadia Gabotto, Gonzalo Viollaz, Álvaro Muratore, Nicolás Nohad Altamirano, Daniel Moya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrospectively evaluate the clinical-functional outcomes, healing rates, complications, and surgical time in patients treated with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using long head of the biceps autograft (LHB) and Achilles allograft (AA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 24 patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, treated with SCR. Two treatment groups were formed: one with 12 cases using AA and another with 12 cases using LHB. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SSV was 73.7 ± 25.3 vs. 86.0 ± 8.7 (p=0.26), the Constant score was 76.8 ± 20.1 vs. 83.7 ± 4.6 (p=0.12), and the VAS was 1.6 ± 2.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 (p=0.9) for the LHB and AA groups, respectively. Tendon healing was 66.7% in AA and 100% in LHB (p=0.001). Complications were 50% in AA and 0% in LHB. The average surgical time was 127.7 ± 37.6 minutes for AA and 84.3 ± 14.3 minutes for LHB (p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SCR with LHB showed better results in terms of tendon healing, fewer complications, and reduced surgical time compared to the use of AA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.11.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder with Long Head of Biceps Autograft vs. Achilles Tendon Allograft: A 2-Year Comparative Study.
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical-functional outcomes, healing rates, complications, and surgical time in patients treated with superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using long head of the biceps autograft (LHB) and Achilles allograft (AA).
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 24 patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, treated with SCR. Two treatment groups were formed: one with 12 cases using AA and another with 12 cases using LHB. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years.
Results: The SSV was 73.7 ± 25.3 vs. 86.0 ± 8.7 (p=0.26), the Constant score was 76.8 ± 20.1 vs. 83.7 ± 4.6 (p=0.12), and the VAS was 1.6 ± 2.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 (p=0.9) for the LHB and AA groups, respectively. Tendon healing was 66.7% in AA and 100% in LHB (p=0.001). Complications were 50% in AA and 0% in LHB. The average surgical time was 127.7 ± 37.6 minutes for AA and 84.3 ± 14.3 minutes for LHB (p=0.01).
Conclusions: SCR with LHB showed better results in terms of tendon healing, fewer complications, and reduced surgical time compared to the use of AA.
期刊介绍：
Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
