预谵妄模型和e -预谵妄模型预测心脏手术后患者谵妄的性别特异性有效性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000001166
Eun Joo Cho Msn, Myoung Soo Kim, Jiwon Park Msn
{"title":"预谵妄模型和e -预谵妄模型预测心脏手术后患者谵妄的性别特异性有效性。","authors":"Eun Joo Cho Msn, Myoung Soo Kim, Jiwon Park Msn","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several risk prediction models are used in intensive care units (ICUs) to detect delirium risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the sex-specific validity of the Prediction of Delirium in ICU patients (PRE-DELIRIC) and Early Prediction of Delirium in ICU patients (E-PRE-DELIRIC) models for predicting delirium in ICU patients after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from electronic medical records of ICU patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2019 and December 2022 were examined. Both models were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values based on the highest Youden index for female and male patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Delirium incidence was 30.7% and 27.5% in female and male patients, respectively. In the PRE-DELIRIC model, the highest Youden index scores for female and male patients were 67.00 and 57.54, respectively, with sensitivities and specificities of 61% and 88%, and 72% and 79%, respectively. In the E-PRE-DELIRIC model, the highest scores for female and male patients were 14.25 and 14.05, with sensitivities and specificities of 78% and 50%, and 70% and 53%, respectively. The area under the curve of the PRE-DELIRIC model for female and male patients was 0.77 and 0.78, respectively, and that of the E-PRE-DELIRIC model was 0.67 and 0.63, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PRE-DELIRIC model showed higher specificity and was more reliable for male patients, whereas the E-PRE-DELIRIC model demonstrated better sensitivity for female patients due to its inclusion of more female-sensitive factors. A combined approach is recommended for improved reliability and validity in delirium risk assessment in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex-Specific Validity of the PRE-DELIRIC Model and the E-PRE-DELIRIC Model for Predicting Delirium in Patients After Cardiac Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Eun Joo Cho Msn, Myoung Soo Kim, Jiwon Park Msn\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several risk prediction models are used in intensive care units (ICUs) to detect delirium risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the sex-specific validity of the Prediction of Delirium in ICU patients (PRE-DELIRIC) and Early Prediction of Delirium in ICU patients (E-PRE-DELIRIC) models for predicting delirium in ICU patients after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from electronic medical records of ICU patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2019 and December 2022 were examined. Both models were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values based on the highest Youden index for female and male patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Delirium incidence was 30.7% and 27.5% in female and male patients, respectively. In the PRE-DELIRIC model, the highest Youden index scores for female and male patients were 67.00 and 57.54, respectively, with sensitivities and specificities of 61% and 88%, and 72% and 79%, respectively. In the E-PRE-DELIRIC model, the highest scores for female and male patients were 14.25 and 14.05, with sensitivities and specificities of 78% and 50%, and 70% and 53%, respectively. The area under the curve of the PRE-DELIRIC model for female and male patients was 0.77 and 0.78, respectively, and that of the E-PRE-DELIRIC model was 0.67 and 0.63, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PRE-DELIRIC model showed higher specificity and was more reliable for male patients, whereas the E-PRE-DELIRIC model demonstrated better sensitivity for female patients due to its inclusion of more female-sensitive factors. A combined approach is recommended for improved reliability and validity in delirium risk assessment in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护病房(ICU)使用多种风险预测模型来检测谵妄风险:本研究旨在比较 ICU 患者谵妄预测模型(PRE-DELIRIC)和 ICU 患者谵妄早期预测模型(E-PRE-DELIRIC)在预测心脏手术后 ICU 患者谵妄方面的性别特异性有效性:对2019年1月至2022年12月期间接受心脏手术的ICU患者电子病历中的回顾性数据进行了研究。根据女性和男性患者的最高尤登指数,使用灵敏度、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值对两种模型进行了评估。进行了接收者操作特征曲线分析:结果:女性和男性患者的谵妄发生率分别为 30.7% 和 27.5%。在 PRE-DELIRIC 模型中,女性和男性患者的最高尤登指数分别为 67.00 和 57.54,敏感性和特异性分别为 61% 和 88%,以及 72% 和 79%。在 E-PRE-DELIRIC 模型中,女性和男性患者的最高得分分别为 14.25 和 14.05,敏感性和特异性分别为 78% 和 50%,以及 70% 和 53%。女性和男性患者的 PRE-DELIRIC 模型的曲线下面积分别为 0.77 和 0.78,E-PRE-DELIRIC 模型的曲线下面积分别为 0.67 和 0.63:结论:PRE-DELIRIC模型对男性患者的特异性更高,更可靠,而E-PRE-DELIRIC模型由于包含了更多女性敏感因素,对女性患者的灵敏度更高。为了提高谵妄风险评估在临床环境中的可靠性和有效性,建议采用综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex-Specific Validity of the PRE-DELIRIC Model and the E-PRE-DELIRIC Model for Predicting Delirium in Patients After Cardiac Surgery.

Background: Several risk prediction models are used in intensive care units (ICUs) to detect delirium risk.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the sex-specific validity of the Prediction of Delirium in ICU patients (PRE-DELIRIC) and Early Prediction of Delirium in ICU patients (E-PRE-DELIRIC) models for predicting delirium in ICU patients after cardiac surgery.

Methods: Retrospective data from electronic medical records of ICU patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 2019 and December 2022 were examined. Both models were evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values based on the highest Youden index for female and male patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.

Results: Delirium incidence was 30.7% and 27.5% in female and male patients, respectively. In the PRE-DELIRIC model, the highest Youden index scores for female and male patients were 67.00 and 57.54, respectively, with sensitivities and specificities of 61% and 88%, and 72% and 79%, respectively. In the E-PRE-DELIRIC model, the highest scores for female and male patients were 14.25 and 14.05, with sensitivities and specificities of 78% and 50%, and 70% and 53%, respectively. The area under the curve of the PRE-DELIRIC model for female and male patients was 0.77 and 0.78, respectively, and that of the E-PRE-DELIRIC model was 0.67 and 0.63, respectively.

Conclusions: The PRE-DELIRIC model showed higher specificity and was more reliable for male patients, whereas the E-PRE-DELIRIC model demonstrated better sensitivity for female patients due to its inclusion of more female-sensitive factors. A combined approach is recommended for improved reliability and validity in delirium risk assessment in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Hand Reflexology Massage on Pain and Anxiety After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Cardiovascular Health Behavior Prediction Model in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Sensitivity and Specificity of Pulse Oximetry for Identification of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review. Dignity, Resilience, and Quality of Life in Patients With Cardiac Disease: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Diet Quality Mediates the Relationship Between Chronic Stress and Inflammation in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1