从试验到实践:挪威黑色素瘤患者的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Acta Oncologica Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2024.41266
Denise Reis Costa, Anna K Winge-Main, Anna Skog, Kaitlyn M Tsuruda, Trude Eid Robsahm, Bettina Kulle Andreassen
{"title":"从试验到实践:挪威黑色素瘤患者的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗。","authors":"Denise Reis Costa, Anna K Winge-Main, Anna Skog, Kaitlyn M Tsuruda, Trude Eid Robsahm, Bettina Kulle Andreassen","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.41266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Norway has one of the highest rates of cutaneous melanoma (CM) incidence and mortality globally. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for CM was introduced between 2014 and 2017 to improve treatment and patient prognosis, but knowledge about its clinical usage is limited. This study investigates patient's characteristics and treatment patterns in real-world practice compared to clinical trial results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All adult (≥18) CM patients treated with ICI therapy in Norway from 2014 to 2021 were included, utilizing high-coverage data from multiple national registries to describe patients' health, socioeconomic factors, and treatment management, stratified by first ICI therapy. We compared patient and tumour characteristics with findings from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,083 patients receiving ICI therapy, 975 (47%) received nivolumab as their first treatment in the metastatic setting. Patients on combination therapy were younger and had higher education and income levels compared to those on monotherapy. Overall, real-world patients were older and had a higher incidence of brain metastases than those in RCTs. Approximately, 1 in 5 patients would have been excluded from RCTs due to pre-existing autoimmune diseases. Targeted therapy was the most common secondary systemic treatment after first-line PD-1 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study details ICI therapy in Norway, highlighting differences between real-world ICI users and clinical trial participants, raising questions about the effectiveness of this treatment for patients not eligible for trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"63 ","pages":"965-973"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From trials to practice: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for melanoma patients in Norway.\",\"authors\":\"Denise Reis Costa, Anna K Winge-Main, Anna Skog, Kaitlyn M Tsuruda, Trude Eid Robsahm, Bettina Kulle Andreassen\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.41266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Norway has one of the highest rates of cutaneous melanoma (CM) incidence and mortality globally. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for CM was introduced between 2014 and 2017 to improve treatment and patient prognosis, but knowledge about its clinical usage is limited. This study investigates patient's characteristics and treatment patterns in real-world practice compared to clinical trial results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All adult (≥18) CM patients treated with ICI therapy in Norway from 2014 to 2021 were included, utilizing high-coverage data from multiple national registries to describe patients' health, socioeconomic factors, and treatment management, stratified by first ICI therapy. We compared patient and tumour characteristics with findings from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,083 patients receiving ICI therapy, 975 (47%) received nivolumab as their first treatment in the metastatic setting. Patients on combination therapy were younger and had higher education and income levels compared to those on monotherapy. Overall, real-world patients were older and had a higher incidence of brain metastases than those in RCTs. Approximately, 1 in 5 patients would have been excluded from RCTs due to pre-existing autoimmune diseases. Targeted therapy was the most common secondary systemic treatment after first-line PD-1 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study details ICI therapy in Norway, highlighting differences between real-world ICI users and clinical trial participants, raising questions about the effectiveness of this treatment for patients not eligible for trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"965-973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681278/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.41266\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.41266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:挪威是全球皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)发病率和死亡率最高的国家之一。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗CM于2014年至2017年引入,以改善治疗和患者预后,但对其临床应用的了解有限。本研究调查患者的特点和治疗模式,在现实世界的做法,比较临床试验结果。材料和方法:纳入2014年至2021年在挪威接受ICI治疗的所有成年(≥18)CM患者,利用来自多个国家登记处的高覆盖率数据来描述患者的健康状况、社会经济因素和治疗管理,并按首次ICI治疗分层。我们将患者和肿瘤特征与五项随机对照试验(rct)的结果进行比较。结果:在2083名接受ICI治疗的患者中,975名(47%)患者在转移性情况下首次接受纳武单抗治疗。与单药治疗的患者相比,联合治疗的患者更年轻,教育程度和收入水平更高。总体而言,现实世界中的患者年龄较大,脑转移的发生率高于随机对照试验中的患者。大约有五分之一的患者由于先前存在自身免疫性疾病而被排除在rct之外。靶向治疗是一线PD-1抑制剂后最常见的二次全身治疗。解释:这项研究详细介绍了挪威的ICI治疗,强调了现实世界中ICI使用者和临床试验参与者之间的差异,提出了这种治疗对不符合试验条件的患者的有效性的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From trials to practice: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for melanoma patients in Norway.

Background and purpose: Norway has one of the highest rates of cutaneous melanoma (CM) incidence and mortality globally. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for CM was introduced between 2014 and 2017 to improve treatment and patient prognosis, but knowledge about its clinical usage is limited. This study investigates patient's characteristics and treatment patterns in real-world practice compared to clinical trial results.

Material and methods: All adult (≥18) CM patients treated with ICI therapy in Norway from 2014 to 2021 were included, utilizing high-coverage data from multiple national registries to describe patients' health, socioeconomic factors, and treatment management, stratified by first ICI therapy. We compared patient and tumour characteristics with findings from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results: Among 2,083 patients receiving ICI therapy, 975 (47%) received nivolumab as their first treatment in the metastatic setting. Patients on combination therapy were younger and had higher education and income levels compared to those on monotherapy. Overall, real-world patients were older and had a higher incidence of brain metastases than those in RCTs. Approximately, 1 in 5 patients would have been excluded from RCTs due to pre-existing autoimmune diseases. Targeted therapy was the most common secondary systemic treatment after first-line PD-1 inhibitors.

Interpretation: This study details ICI therapy in Norway, highlighting differences between real-world ICI users and clinical trial participants, raising questions about the effectiveness of this treatment for patients not eligible for trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
期刊最新文献
Determining the effect of frailty on survival in advanced ovarian cancer: study protocol for a prospective multicentre national cohort study (FOLERO). Cardiac CT reveals high prevalence of coronary artery disease in esophageal cancer eligible for radiotherapy. Lynch syndrome screening in colorectal and endometrial cancers in Iceland. Relapse detection in the Danish surveillance program of patients with clinical stage I seminoma: a nationwide study. Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Finland: a national, population-based cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1