【甲氨蝶呤在类风湿性关节炎患者中的应用现状】。

Q3 Medicine 北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2024-12-18
Yijun Han, Xiaoli Chen, Changhong Li, Jinxia Zhao
{"title":"【甲氨蝶呤在类风湿性关节炎患者中的应用现状】。","authors":"Yijun Han, Xiaoli Chen, Changhong Li, Jinxia Zhao","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the current status of methotrexate (MTX) application in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical and laboratory data of RA patients who attended in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2022 to November 31, 2023 were collected retrospectively. In order to figure out the relationship between MTX use and RA disease control, we recorded information including the starting dose, maximum dose, current dose, reasons of discontinuation of MTX, <i>etc</i>. The <i>t</i> test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, Chi-square test, Fisher' s exact probability and multivariable Logistic regression were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 239 RA patients were enrolled, including 201 females and 38 males with a mean age of (54.5±14.3) years. Among them, 101 patients reached the therapeutic target [clinical remission or low disease activity assessed by 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)], accounting for 42.2% of the RA patients. Twenty-six patients met the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definition of difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA, accounting for 10.9% of RA patients. The proportion of the RA patients who had ever used MTX was 84. 1%, and those who were currently on it accounted for only 39.7%. The MTX dose was generally low, with a starting dose of (9.5±3.0) mg/week, the maximum dose of 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) mg/week, and the current dose being (12.4±2.7) mg/week. The most common reasons for MTX dose reduction or discontinuation were adverse reactions, mainly including abnormalities of hepatic function, gastrointestinal discomfort, leucopenia, <i>etc.</i> Those who were currently on MTX had a higher rate of treatment to target (52.6% <i>vs.</i> 35.4%, <i>P></i>0.05), lower disease activity score (DAS28-ESR, 3.6±1.8 <i>vs.</i> 4.2±1.8, <i>P</i> < 0.05), and fewer tender joint counts (4.8±8.3 <i>vs.</i> 8.6±10.4, <i>P</i> < 0.05) as compared with those who were not taking the drug, while swollen joint count, pain visual analog score and patient' s global score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level and ESR level were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with those who did not reach the target of treatment, those who did had a higher rate of current MTX application (48.5% <i>vs.</i> 33.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.05), but the history of MTX did not differ between the two groups (84.2% <i>vs.</i> 84.1%, <i>P</i>>0.05). The maximum dose of MTX (median 15.0 mg/week <i>vs.</i> 13.7 mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05) and the current dose [(12.9±2.5) mg/week <i>vs.</i> (11.8±2.8) mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05] was higher in those who achieved the target, while the starting dose [(9.6±2.8) mg/week <i>vs.</i> (9.5±3.1) mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05] and the rate of prior MTX (84.2% <i>vs.</i> 83.3%, <i>P</i>>0.05) was comparable between the two groups. The D2T RA patients had a higher rate of previous MTX use (96.2% <i>vs.</i> 82.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and a higher starting dose [(11.6±4.3) mg/week <i>vs.</i> (9.8±2.7) mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05], while the maximum dose (median 12.5 mg/week <i>vs.</i> 15.0 mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05) and the current dose were both lower [(11.6±3.2) mg/week <i>vs.</i> (12.5±2.6) mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05] than the non-D2T RA patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of regular use of MTX among RA patients was low and the dose was generally small. The RA patients with regular use of MTX had a higher rate of achieving treatment target and lower disease activity. Those who achieved the target had a higher rate of current MTX use, higher maximum and current doses than those who did not. The D2T RA patients had lower maximum and current doses of MTX than the non-D2T RA patients. Therefore, increasing the usage and dosage of MTX in RA patients may help to improve the rate of achieving treatment targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"56 6","pages":"994-1000"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Application status of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].\",\"authors\":\"Yijun Han, Xiaoli Chen, Changhong Li, Jinxia Zhao\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the current status of methotrexate (MTX) application in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical and laboratory data of RA patients who attended in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2022 to November 31, 2023 were collected retrospectively. In order to figure out the relationship between MTX use and RA disease control, we recorded information including the starting dose, maximum dose, current dose, reasons of discontinuation of MTX, <i>etc</i>. The <i>t</i> test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, Chi-square test, Fisher' s exact probability and multivariable Logistic regression were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 239 RA patients were enrolled, including 201 females and 38 males with a mean age of (54.5±14.3) years. Among them, 101 patients reached the therapeutic target [clinical remission or low disease activity assessed by 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)], accounting for 42.2% of the RA patients. Twenty-six patients met the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definition of difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA, accounting for 10.9% of RA patients. The proportion of the RA patients who had ever used MTX was 84. 1%, and those who were currently on it accounted for only 39.7%. The MTX dose was generally low, with a starting dose of (9.5±3.0) mg/week, the maximum dose of 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) mg/week, and the current dose being (12.4±2.7) mg/week. The most common reasons for MTX dose reduction or discontinuation were adverse reactions, mainly including abnormalities of hepatic function, gastrointestinal discomfort, leucopenia, <i>etc.</i> Those who were currently on MTX had a higher rate of treatment to target (52.6% <i>vs.</i> 35.4%, <i>P></i>0.05), lower disease activity score (DAS28-ESR, 3.6±1.8 <i>vs.</i> 4.2±1.8, <i>P</i> < 0.05), and fewer tender joint counts (4.8±8.3 <i>vs.</i> 8.6±10.4, <i>P</i> < 0.05) as compared with those who were not taking the drug, while swollen joint count, pain visual analog score and patient' s global score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level and ESR level were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with those who did not reach the target of treatment, those who did had a higher rate of current MTX application (48.5% <i>vs.</i> 33.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.05), but the history of MTX did not differ between the two groups (84.2% <i>vs.</i> 84.1%, <i>P</i>>0.05). The maximum dose of MTX (median 15.0 mg/week <i>vs.</i> 13.7 mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05) and the current dose [(12.9±2.5) mg/week <i>vs.</i> (11.8±2.8) mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05] was higher in those who achieved the target, while the starting dose [(9.6±2.8) mg/week <i>vs.</i> (9.5±3.1) mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05] and the rate of prior MTX (84.2% <i>vs.</i> 83.3%, <i>P</i>>0.05) was comparable between the two groups. The D2T RA patients had a higher rate of previous MTX use (96.2% <i>vs.</i> 82.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and a higher starting dose [(11.6±4.3) mg/week <i>vs.</i> (9.8±2.7) mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05], while the maximum dose (median 12.5 mg/week <i>vs.</i> 15.0 mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05) and the current dose were both lower [(11.6±3.2) mg/week <i>vs.</i> (12.5±2.6) mg/week, <i>P</i>>0.05] than the non-D2T RA patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of regular use of MTX among RA patients was low and the dose was generally small. The RA patients with regular use of MTX had a higher rate of achieving treatment target and lower disease activity. Those who achieved the target had a higher rate of current MTX use, higher maximum and current doses than those who did not. The D2T RA patients had lower maximum and current doses of MTX than the non-D2T RA patients. Therefore, increasing the usage and dosage of MTX in RA patients may help to improve the rate of achieving treatment targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":\"56 6\",\"pages\":\"994-1000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"北京大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解甲氨蝶呤(MTX)在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的应用现状。方法:回顾性收集北京大学第三医院风湿病免疫科2022年1月1日至2023年11月31日收治的RA患者的临床和实验室资料。为了了解MTX的使用与RA疾病控制的关系,我们记录了MTX的起始剂量、最大剂量、当前剂量、停药原因等信息。采用t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、卡方检验、Fisher精确概率和多变量Logistic回归进行分析。结果:共纳入239例RA患者,其中女性201例,男性38例,平均年龄(54.5±14.3)岁。其中101例患者达到治疗目标[以28关节疾病活动度评分(DAS28)-红细胞沉降率(ESR)评估临床缓解或低疾病活动度],占RA患者的42.2%。26例患者符合欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)对难治性(D2T) RA的定义,占RA患者的10.9%。曾使用过甲氨蝶呤的RA患者比例为84%。1%,而目前正在使用它的人只占39.7%。MTX剂量普遍较低,起始剂量为(9.5±3.0)mg/周,最大剂量为15.0 (10.0,15.0)mg/周,目前剂量为(12.4±2.7)mg/周。MTX减量或停药最常见的原因是不良反应,主要包括肝功能异常、胃肠道不适、白细胞减少等。与未服用MTX的患者相比,目前服用MTX的患者治疗成功率更高(52.6% vs. 35.4%, P < 0.05),疾病活动性评分(DAS28-ESR, 3.6±1.8 vs. 4.2±1.8,P < 0.05),压痛关节计数(4.8±8.3 vs. 8.6±10.4,P < 0.05),而肿胀关节计数、疼痛视觉模拟评分、患者整体评分、c反应蛋白(CRP)水平和ESR水平在两组间无显著差异。与未达到治疗目标的患者相比,达到治疗目标的患者目前使用MTX的比例更高(48.5%比33.3%,P < 0.05),但两组之间MTX史无差异(84.2%比84.1%,P < 0.05)。MTX的最大剂量(中位数15.0 mg/周vs. 13.7 mg/周,P >.05)和当前剂量[(12.9±2.5)mg/周vs.(11.8±2.8)mg/周,P >.05]在达到目标的患者中较高,而起始剂量[(9.6±2.8)mg/周vs.(9.5±3.1)mg/周,P >.05]和既往MTX率(84.2% vs. 83.3%, P b>.05)在两组之间具有可比性。D2T RA患者既往MTX使用率较高(96.2% vs. 82.6%, P < 0.05),起始剂量较高[(11.6±4.3)mg/周vs.(9.8±2.7)mg/周,P >.05],而最大剂量(中位12.5 mg/周vs. 15.0 mg/周,P >.05)和当前剂量均低于非D2T RA患者[(11.6±3.2)mg/周vs.(12.5±2.6)mg/周,P b>.05]。结论:甲氨蝶呤在RA患者中常规使用的比例较低,剂量普遍较小。定期使用MTX的RA患者达到治疗目标的率较高,疾病活动度较低。那些达到目标的人比那些没有达到目标的人有更高的当前MTX使用率,更高的最大剂量和当前剂量。与非D2T类RA患者相比,D2T类RA患者MTX的最大剂量和当前剂量较低。因此,在RA患者中增加MTX的使用和剂量可能有助于提高治疗目标的达成率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Application status of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].

Objective: To investigate the current status of methotrexate (MTX) application in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods: The clinical and laboratory data of RA patients who attended in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2022 to November 31, 2023 were collected retrospectively. In order to figure out the relationship between MTX use and RA disease control, we recorded information including the starting dose, maximum dose, current dose, reasons of discontinuation of MTX, etc. The t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, Fisher' s exact probability and multivariable Logistic regression were used for analysis.

Results: A total of 239 RA patients were enrolled, including 201 females and 38 males with a mean age of (54.5±14.3) years. Among them, 101 patients reached the therapeutic target [clinical remission or low disease activity assessed by 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)], accounting for 42.2% of the RA patients. Twenty-six patients met the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definition of difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA, accounting for 10.9% of RA patients. The proportion of the RA patients who had ever used MTX was 84. 1%, and those who were currently on it accounted for only 39.7%. The MTX dose was generally low, with a starting dose of (9.5±3.0) mg/week, the maximum dose of 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) mg/week, and the current dose being (12.4±2.7) mg/week. The most common reasons for MTX dose reduction or discontinuation were adverse reactions, mainly including abnormalities of hepatic function, gastrointestinal discomfort, leucopenia, etc. Those who were currently on MTX had a higher rate of treatment to target (52.6% vs. 35.4%, P>0.05), lower disease activity score (DAS28-ESR, 3.6±1.8 vs. 4.2±1.8, P < 0.05), and fewer tender joint counts (4.8±8.3 vs. 8.6±10.4, P < 0.05) as compared with those who were not taking the drug, while swollen joint count, pain visual analog score and patient' s global score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level and ESR level were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with those who did not reach the target of treatment, those who did had a higher rate of current MTX application (48.5% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.05), but the history of MTX did not differ between the two groups (84.2% vs. 84.1%, P>0.05). The maximum dose of MTX (median 15.0 mg/week vs. 13.7 mg/week, P>0.05) and the current dose [(12.9±2.5) mg/week vs. (11.8±2.8) mg/week, P>0.05] was higher in those who achieved the target, while the starting dose [(9.6±2.8) mg/week vs. (9.5±3.1) mg/week, P>0.05] and the rate of prior MTX (84.2% vs. 83.3%, P>0.05) was comparable between the two groups. The D2T RA patients had a higher rate of previous MTX use (96.2% vs. 82.6%, P < 0.05) and a higher starting dose [(11.6±4.3) mg/week vs. (9.8±2.7) mg/week, P>0.05], while the maximum dose (median 12.5 mg/week vs. 15.0 mg/week, P>0.05) and the current dose were both lower [(11.6±3.2) mg/week vs. (12.5±2.6) mg/week, P>0.05] than the non-D2T RA patients.

Conclusion: The proportion of regular use of MTX among RA patients was low and the dose was generally small. The RA patients with regular use of MTX had a higher rate of achieving treatment target and lower disease activity. Those who achieved the target had a higher rate of current MTX use, higher maximum and current doses than those who did not. The D2T RA patients had lower maximum and current doses of MTX than the non-D2T RA patients. Therefore, increasing the usage and dosage of MTX in RA patients may help to improve the rate of achieving treatment targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases. The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.
期刊最新文献
[Frameshift mutation in RELT gene causes amelogenesis imperfecta]. [Hydrodynamic finite element analysis of biological scaffolds with different pore sizes for cell growth and osteogenic differentiation]. [Influence of emergence profile designs on the peri-implant tissue in the mandibular molar: A randomized controlled trial]. [Knockdown of NPTX1 promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells]. [Application of dual chamber round tissue expander in immediate breast reconstruction].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1