唐氏综合症退行性障碍家庭输液的安全性和耐受性。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.023
Jonathan D Santoro, Lina Nguyen, Nicole A Nishimori, Ruby Ferris, Benjamin N Vogel, Natalie K Boyd, Lilia Kazerooni, Shermila Pia, Mellad M Khoshnood, Saba Jafarpour
{"title":"唐氏综合症退行性障碍家庭输液的安全性和耐受性。","authors":"Jonathan D Santoro, Lina Nguyen, Nicole A Nishimori, Ruby Ferris, Benjamin N Vogel, Natalie K Boyd, Lilia Kazerooni, Shermila Pia, Mellad M Khoshnood, Saba Jafarpour","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) is a rare neuropsychiatric condition affecting otherwise healthy individuals with Down syndrome. Multiple studies on DSRD have revealed that immunotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is both safe and effective, although site of infusion has never been studied. This study sought to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IVIg in individuals with DSRD receiving home-based infusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective chart review evaluating infusion reactions was performed for individuals meeting criteria for DSRD and having received IVIg infusions between 2019 and 2024. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated for severity and need for alterations in infusion plan. A cohort of individuals receiving home-based infusions was compared with a cohort of individuals receiving infusions at an academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 315 individuals (162 institutional infusions [51%] and 153 home infusions [49%]) met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistical differences between the demographic and clinical features of the cohorts. Individuals receiving home infusions had the same rate of AE during an infusion (P = 0.14), although they did have a lower number of total AEs (P < 0.001). Individuals receiving home infusions experienced a lower number of behavioral issues with infusions (P = 0.03) and had significantly lower discontinuations of infusions secondary to behavioral issues (P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Rates of AEs and serious AEs in those with DSRD were the same regardless of site of infusion. These data should be considered in policy regarding the appropriateness of home-based infusions as a safe alternative, when suitable for patients and caregivers, for individuals with DSRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Tolerability of Home Infusions in Down Syndrome Regression Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan D Santoro, Lina Nguyen, Nicole A Nishimori, Ruby Ferris, Benjamin N Vogel, Natalie K Boyd, Lilia Kazerooni, Shermila Pia, Mellad M Khoshnood, Saba Jafarpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) is a rare neuropsychiatric condition affecting otherwise healthy individuals with Down syndrome. Multiple studies on DSRD have revealed that immunotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is both safe and effective, although site of infusion has never been studied. This study sought to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IVIg in individuals with DSRD receiving home-based infusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective chart review evaluating infusion reactions was performed for individuals meeting criteria for DSRD and having received IVIg infusions between 2019 and 2024. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated for severity and need for alterations in infusion plan. A cohort of individuals receiving home-based infusions was compared with a cohort of individuals receiving infusions at an academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 315 individuals (162 institutional infusions [51%] and 153 home infusions [49%]) met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistical differences between the demographic and clinical features of the cohorts. Individuals receiving home infusions had the same rate of AE during an infusion (P = 0.14), although they did have a lower number of total AEs (P < 0.001). Individuals receiving home infusions experienced a lower number of behavioral issues with infusions (P = 0.03) and had significantly lower discontinuations of infusions secondary to behavioral issues (P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Rates of AEs and serious AEs in those with DSRD were the same regardless of site of infusion. These data should be considered in policy regarding the appropriateness of home-based infusions as a safe alternative, when suitable for patients and caregivers, for individuals with DSRD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:唐氏综合征退行性障碍(DSRD)是一种罕见的神经精神疾病,影响其他健康的唐氏综合征患者。多项研究表明,静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)免疫治疗是安全有效的,尽管从未研究过输注部位。本研究旨在评估接受家庭输液的dsd患者IVIg的安全性和耐受性。方法:对2019年至2024年期间接受IVIg输注的符合dsd标准的个体进行单中心回顾性图表回顾,评估输液反应。评估不良事件(ae)的严重程度和是否需要改变输注计划。一组接受家庭输液的个体与一组在学术医疗中心接受输液的个体进行了比较。结果:共有315人(机构输液162例[51%],家庭输液153例[49%])符合纳入标准。队列的人口学和临床特征之间没有统计学差异。接受家庭输液的个体在输液期间的AE发生率相同(P = 0.14),尽管他们的AE总数较低(P < 0.001)。接受家庭输液的个体在输液过程中出现的行为问题较少(P = 0.03),因行为问题而停止输液的人数也显著减少(P = 0.04)。含义:无论输注部位如何,DSRD患者的不良反应发生率和严重不良反应发生率是相同的。这些数据应该在政策中考虑到家庭输液是否适合作为一种安全的替代方案,当适合患者和护理人员时,对于患有dsd的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and Tolerability of Home Infusions in Down Syndrome Regression Disorder.

Purpose: Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) is a rare neuropsychiatric condition affecting otherwise healthy individuals with Down syndrome. Multiple studies on DSRD have revealed that immunotherapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is both safe and effective, although site of infusion has never been studied. This study sought to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IVIg in individuals with DSRD receiving home-based infusions.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective chart review evaluating infusion reactions was performed for individuals meeting criteria for DSRD and having received IVIg infusions between 2019 and 2024. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated for severity and need for alterations in infusion plan. A cohort of individuals receiving home-based infusions was compared with a cohort of individuals receiving infusions at an academic medical center.

Findings: A total of 315 individuals (162 institutional infusions [51%] and 153 home infusions [49%]) met the inclusion criteria. There were no statistical differences between the demographic and clinical features of the cohorts. Individuals receiving home infusions had the same rate of AE during an infusion (P = 0.14), although they did have a lower number of total AEs (P < 0.001). Individuals receiving home infusions experienced a lower number of behavioral issues with infusions (P = 0.03) and had significantly lower discontinuations of infusions secondary to behavioral issues (P = 0.04).

Implications: Rates of AEs and serious AEs in those with DSRD were the same regardless of site of infusion. These data should be considered in policy regarding the appropriateness of home-based infusions as a safe alternative, when suitable for patients and caregivers, for individuals with DSRD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
Bioequivalence of Water-Soluble Progesterone Injection (GenSci070) in Healthy Chinese Postmenopausal Women Volunteers. Potential of Albumin-Bilirubin Score for Estimating the Voriconazole-Induced Hepatotoxicity Undergoing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Vancomycin Dosing in Patients on Intermittent Hemodialysis-A Retrospective Study. Efficacy of Apheresis in the Remission of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Efficacy of Oral Medication in Weight Loss Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1