神经重症监护室医疗人员使用护理点超声和重症监护超声的情况:全国调查。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02174-0
Melvin Parasram, Shamelia Y Loiseau, Thanujaa Subramaniam, Neha S Dangayach, Aarti Sarwal, Judy H Ch'ang
{"title":"神经重症监护室医疗人员使用护理点超声和重症监护超声的情况:全国调查。","authors":"Melvin Parasram, Shamelia Y Loiseau, Thanujaa Subramaniam, Neha S Dangayach, Aarti Sarwal, Judy H Ch'ang","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02174-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)/critical care ultrasound (CCU) use in medical and surgical intensive care units has surged over the last few decades. It is unclear if this has similarly translated in neurocritical care (NCC) units. We designed a survey to describe the current state of POCUS/CCU use and training among NCC providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online 13-question survey was distributed nationally through newsletters and social media after endorsement by the Neurocritical Care Society. Participation was voluntary, and responses were anonymous. The survey queried respondent demographics, training, clinical use, confidence in POCUS/CCU, and barriers to POCUS/CCU use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 119 NCC providers responded to the survey. Most respondents were attending neurointensivists (52.1%) and had completed neurology residency training (62.2%). Approximately 23% of respondents did not have training in POCUS/CCU, and 71% of respondents had not completed POCUS/CCU board-certified training. Fifty-five percent of respondents used POCUS/CCU in their practice frequently, and 37% used it rarely on a weekly basis. Thirty-six percent and 42% of respondents felt moderately skilled at acquiring and interpreting POCUS/CCU images, respectively. Ultrasound guidance for procedures was the most common technique used by respondents. Most respondents felt that using ultrasound for volume status, procedural guidance, and evaluation of shock influenced clinical decision-making. Lack of confidence in interpreting data/imaging and comfort in performing POCUS/CCU were the most common barriers to ultrasound use. Respondents agreed with incorporation of POCUS/CCU training in NCC fellowship milestones and creating resources for credentialing providers in POCUS/CCU to increase use of POCUS/CCU in NCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This national survey indicated that POCUS/CCU is moderately used among NCC providers. However, more formalized and robust training in POCUS/CCU is needed for trainees and practitioners in NCC to enhance comfortability with using ultrasound for clinical assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Critical Care Ultrasound use Among Providers in Neurocritical Units: A National Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Melvin Parasram, Shamelia Y Loiseau, Thanujaa Subramaniam, Neha S Dangayach, Aarti Sarwal, Judy H Ch'ang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-024-02174-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)/critical care ultrasound (CCU) use in medical and surgical intensive care units has surged over the last few decades. It is unclear if this has similarly translated in neurocritical care (NCC) units. We designed a survey to describe the current state of POCUS/CCU use and training among NCC providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online 13-question survey was distributed nationally through newsletters and social media after endorsement by the Neurocritical Care Society. Participation was voluntary, and responses were anonymous. The survey queried respondent demographics, training, clinical use, confidence in POCUS/CCU, and barriers to POCUS/CCU use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 119 NCC providers responded to the survey. Most respondents were attending neurointensivists (52.1%) and had completed neurology residency training (62.2%). Approximately 23% of respondents did not have training in POCUS/CCU, and 71% of respondents had not completed POCUS/CCU board-certified training. Fifty-five percent of respondents used POCUS/CCU in their practice frequently, and 37% used it rarely on a weekly basis. Thirty-six percent and 42% of respondents felt moderately skilled at acquiring and interpreting POCUS/CCU images, respectively. Ultrasound guidance for procedures was the most common technique used by respondents. Most respondents felt that using ultrasound for volume status, procedural guidance, and evaluation of shock influenced clinical decision-making. Lack of confidence in interpreting data/imaging and comfort in performing POCUS/CCU were the most common barriers to ultrasound use. Respondents agreed with incorporation of POCUS/CCU training in NCC fellowship milestones and creating resources for credentialing providers in POCUS/CCU to increase use of POCUS/CCU in NCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This national survey indicated that POCUS/CCU is moderately used among NCC providers. However, more formalized and robust training in POCUS/CCU is needed for trainees and practitioners in NCC to enhance comfortability with using ultrasound for clinical assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02174-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02174-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的几十年里,在内科和外科重症监护病房中,即时超声(POCUS)/重症监护超声(CCU)的使用激增。目前尚不清楚这是否同样适用于神经危重症(NCC)病房。我们设计了一项调查来描述POCUS/CCU在NCC提供者中的使用和培训的现状。方法:经神经危重症护理学会认可后,通过通讯和社交媒体在全国范围内进行13个问题的在线调查。参与是自愿的,回答是匿名的。调查询问了受访者的人口统计、培训、临床使用情况、对POCUS/CCU的信心以及使用POCUS/CCU的障碍。结果:总体而言,119家NCC供应商回应了调查。大多数受访者是神经专科医生(52.1%),并完成了神经内科住院医师培训(62.2%)。大约23%的受访者没有接受过POCUS/CCU的培训,71%的受访者没有完成POCUS/CCU委员会认证的培训。55%的受访者在实践中经常使用POCUS/CCU, 37%的受访者每周很少使用。36%和42%的受访者分别认为在获取和解释POCUS/CCU图像方面具有中等水平的技能。超声指导手术是受访者最常用的技术。大多数受访者认为,使用超声对容积状态、程序指导和休克评估影响临床决策。对数据/图像的解读缺乏信心,以及在POCUS/CCU执行时的舒适性是超声应用的最常见障碍。受访者同意将POCUS/CCU培训纳入NCC奖学金里程碑,并为POCUS/CCU的认证提供者创建资源,以增加POCUS/CCU在NCC中的使用。结论:这项全国调查表明POCUS/CCU在NCC提供者中被适度使用。然而,NCC的受训者和从业人员需要对POCUS/CCU进行更正式、更有力的培训,以提高使用超声进行临床评估的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Critical Care Ultrasound use Among Providers in Neurocritical Units: A National Survey.

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)/critical care ultrasound (CCU) use in medical and surgical intensive care units has surged over the last few decades. It is unclear if this has similarly translated in neurocritical care (NCC) units. We designed a survey to describe the current state of POCUS/CCU use and training among NCC providers.

Methods: An online 13-question survey was distributed nationally through newsletters and social media after endorsement by the Neurocritical Care Society. Participation was voluntary, and responses were anonymous. The survey queried respondent demographics, training, clinical use, confidence in POCUS/CCU, and barriers to POCUS/CCU use.

Results: Overall, 119 NCC providers responded to the survey. Most respondents were attending neurointensivists (52.1%) and had completed neurology residency training (62.2%). Approximately 23% of respondents did not have training in POCUS/CCU, and 71% of respondents had not completed POCUS/CCU board-certified training. Fifty-five percent of respondents used POCUS/CCU in their practice frequently, and 37% used it rarely on a weekly basis. Thirty-six percent and 42% of respondents felt moderately skilled at acquiring and interpreting POCUS/CCU images, respectively. Ultrasound guidance for procedures was the most common technique used by respondents. Most respondents felt that using ultrasound for volume status, procedural guidance, and evaluation of shock influenced clinical decision-making. Lack of confidence in interpreting data/imaging and comfort in performing POCUS/CCU were the most common barriers to ultrasound use. Respondents agreed with incorporation of POCUS/CCU training in NCC fellowship milestones and creating resources for credentialing providers in POCUS/CCU to increase use of POCUS/CCU in NCC.

Conclusions: This national survey indicated that POCUS/CCU is moderately used among NCC providers. However, more formalized and robust training in POCUS/CCU is needed for trainees and practitioners in NCC to enhance comfortability with using ultrasound for clinical assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care Spiritual Assessment and Goals-of-Care Discussions in the Neurocritical Care Unit: Collaborating with Chaplains. States Do Not Delineate the "Accepted Medical Standards" for Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination. Does Celecoxib Actually Reduce Mortality in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage? Hemoglobin Decrements are Associated with Ischemic Brain Lesions and Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Safety Analysis of Visual Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Neurocritical Care Patients with Anticoagulation and Antithrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1