产前 AUDIT 酒精紊乱筛查的有效性--瑞典全国登记研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Upsala journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.48101/ujms.v129.10770
Susanne Hesselman, Joline Asp, Ulrika Pellas, Susanne Lager, Anna Wikman
{"title":"产前 AUDIT 酒精紊乱筛查的有效性--瑞典全国登记研究。","authors":"Susanne Hesselman, Joline Asp, Ulrika Pellas, Susanne Lager, Anna Wikman","doi":"10.48101/ujms.v129.10770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the external validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in Swedish prenatal care as an indicator for alcohol-addiction disorders, and to characterize women with mismatched information in healthcare registers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was designed as a National register-based study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sweden.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study sample included 739,735 pregnancies over the period 2014-2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected prenatal AUDIT screening in the <i>Swedish Pregnancy register</i> was linked to national health databases through individual identification number. The AUDIT score was dichotomized into < 6 points (low-risk use) and ≥ 6 points (hazardous use). Alcohol addiction disorders were defined by a diagnostic code in <i>The Swedish National Patient Register</i> or drugs dispensed for alcohol dependence in the <i>Swedish Prescribed Drug Register</i>.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>The diagnostic properties of AUDIT were assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative) for an AUDIT score of ≥ 6 points for alcohol disorders. Women with mismatched information in the register were characterized and assessed by multinominal logistic regression, using women with matched information in the registers for reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An alcohol-related disorder was recorded in 3.1%, while 25,770 (3.5%) had an AUDIT point ≥ 6. The diagnostic accuracy of the AUDIT ≥ 6 points for detection of an alcohol related disorder during a year prior to pregnancy was 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.7, 95.8), with a positive LR of 8.03 (95% CI: 7.5, 8.6). The sensitivity for detecting a pre-pregnancy alcohol related disorder was 33.0% (95% CI: 30.9, 35.1). Being young, nulliparous, of low education, and of Swedish origin increased the likelihood of being misclassified with the AUDIT. Prior psychiatric care was associated with false negatives, especially for women with neuropsychiatric disorders (odds ratio [OR]: 10.39, 95% CI: 9.89, 10.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy of AUDIT in screening for alcohol disorders at a population-based level was high, but only identified one third of women with alcohol-related disorders when using a cut-off of six points criterion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23458,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","volume":"129 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of prenatal AUDIT screening for alcohol disorders - a Nationwide Swedish register study.\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Hesselman, Joline Asp, Ulrika Pellas, Susanne Lager, Anna Wikman\",\"doi\":\"10.48101/ujms.v129.10770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the external validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in Swedish prenatal care as an indicator for alcohol-addiction disorders, and to characterize women with mismatched information in healthcare registers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was designed as a National register-based study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sweden.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The study sample included 739,735 pregnancies over the period 2014-2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected prenatal AUDIT screening in the <i>Swedish Pregnancy register</i> was linked to national health databases through individual identification number. The AUDIT score was dichotomized into < 6 points (low-risk use) and ≥ 6 points (hazardous use). Alcohol addiction disorders were defined by a diagnostic code in <i>The Swedish National Patient Register</i> or drugs dispensed for alcohol dependence in the <i>Swedish Prescribed Drug Register</i>.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>The diagnostic properties of AUDIT were assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative) for an AUDIT score of ≥ 6 points for alcohol disorders. Women with mismatched information in the register were characterized and assessed by multinominal logistic regression, using women with matched information in the registers for reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An alcohol-related disorder was recorded in 3.1%, while 25,770 (3.5%) had an AUDIT point ≥ 6. The diagnostic accuracy of the AUDIT ≥ 6 points for detection of an alcohol related disorder during a year prior to pregnancy was 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.7, 95.8), with a positive LR of 8.03 (95% CI: 7.5, 8.6). The sensitivity for detecting a pre-pregnancy alcohol related disorder was 33.0% (95% CI: 30.9, 35.1). Being young, nulliparous, of low education, and of Swedish origin increased the likelihood of being misclassified with the AUDIT. Prior psychiatric care was associated with false negatives, especially for women with neuropsychiatric disorders (odds ratio [OR]: 10.39, 95% CI: 9.89, 10.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy of AUDIT in screening for alcohol disorders at a population-based level was high, but only identified one third of women with alcohol-related disorders when using a cut-off of six points criterion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upsala journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650420/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upsala journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v129.10770\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v129.10770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估瑞典产前护理中酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)作为酒精成瘾障碍指标的外部有效性,并表征医疗保健登记册中信息不匹配的妇女。设计:本研究设计为基于国家登记册的研究。设置:瑞典。参与者:研究样本包括2014-2020年期间的739,735例怀孕。方法:前瞻性收集产前审计筛选瑞典妊娠登记通过个人识别号码连接到国家卫生数据库。审计评分分为< 6分(低风险使用)和≥6分(危险使用)。酒精成瘾障碍由瑞典国家患者登记册中的诊断代码或瑞典处方药登记册中为酒精依赖而配发的药物来定义。主要结局指标:根据AUDIT评分≥6分对酒精障碍的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性似然比(LR+)、阴性似然比(LR-)和准确性(真阳性和真阴性比例)评估AUDIT的诊断特性。以注册表中信息匹配的女性为参考,采用多项逻辑回归对注册表中信息不匹配的女性进行表征和评估。结果:3.1%的患者存在酒精相关障碍,25,770例(3.5%)的审计点≥6。在妊娠前一年,AUDIT≥6分检测酒精相关障碍的诊断准确性为95.7%(95%可信区间[CI]: 95.7, 95.8),阳性LR为8.03 (95% CI: 7.5, 8.6)。检测孕前酒精相关疾病的敏感性为33.0% (95% CI: 30.9, 35.1)。年轻、未婚、教育程度低、瑞典裔增加了被误分类的可能性。先前的精神病学治疗与假阴性相关,特别是患有神经精神疾病的女性(优势比[OR]: 10.39, 95% CI: 9.89, 10.90)。结论:在以人群为基础的水平上,AUDIT筛查酒精相关疾病的准确性很高,但当使用6分的截止标准时,仅识别出三分之一患有酒精相关疾病的女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity of prenatal AUDIT screening for alcohol disorders - a Nationwide Swedish register study.

Objective: This study aims to assess the external validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in Swedish prenatal care as an indicator for alcohol-addiction disorders, and to characterize women with mismatched information in healthcare registers.

Design: This study was designed as a National register-based study.

Setting: Sweden.

Participants: The study sample included 739,735 pregnancies over the period 2014-2020.

Methods: Prospectively collected prenatal AUDIT screening in the Swedish Pregnancy register was linked to national health databases through individual identification number. The AUDIT score was dichotomized into < 6 points (low-risk use) and ≥ 6 points (hazardous use). Alcohol addiction disorders were defined by a diagnostic code in The Swedish National Patient Register or drugs dispensed for alcohol dependence in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.

Primary outcome measures: The diagnostic properties of AUDIT were assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative) for an AUDIT score of ≥ 6 points for alcohol disorders. Women with mismatched information in the register were characterized and assessed by multinominal logistic regression, using women with matched information in the registers for reference.

Results: An alcohol-related disorder was recorded in 3.1%, while 25,770 (3.5%) had an AUDIT point ≥ 6. The diagnostic accuracy of the AUDIT ≥ 6 points for detection of an alcohol related disorder during a year prior to pregnancy was 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.7, 95.8), with a positive LR of 8.03 (95% CI: 7.5, 8.6). The sensitivity for detecting a pre-pregnancy alcohol related disorder was 33.0% (95% CI: 30.9, 35.1). Being young, nulliparous, of low education, and of Swedish origin increased the likelihood of being misclassified with the AUDIT. Prior psychiatric care was associated with false negatives, especially for women with neuropsychiatric disorders (odds ratio [OR]: 10.39, 95% CI: 9.89, 10.90).

Conclusions: The accuracy of AUDIT in screening for alcohol disorders at a population-based level was high, but only identified one third of women with alcohol-related disorders when using a cut-off of six points criterion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Upsala journal of medical sciences
Upsala journal of medical sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences is published for the Upsala Medical Society. It has been published since 1865 and is one of the oldest medical journals in Sweden. The journal publishes clinical and experimental original works in the medical field. Although focusing on regional issues, the journal always welcomes contributions from outside Sweden. Specially extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics, congress proceedings and academic dissertations.
期刊最新文献
Special issue: frontiers in recent advances on cancer diagnosis and treatment. Determinants of growth differentiation factor 15 plasma levels in outpatients with peripheral arterial disease. From early methods for DNA diagnostics to genomes and epigenomes at high resolution during four decades - a personal perspective. The association between TNF-receptors (TNFR1 and TNFR2) and mortality as well as kidney function decline in patients with chronic kidney disease. Validity of prenatal AUDIT screening for alcohol disorders - a Nationwide Swedish register study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1