与患者接受转介到多用途资源中心的社会服务和社区资源相关的个人和临床因素。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Translational Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibae072
Gabrielle Green, Roxana Flores, Noel C Barragan, Karla Gonzalez, Tony Kuo
{"title":"与患者接受转介到多用途资源中心的社会服务和社区资源相关的个人和临床因素。","authors":"Gabrielle Green, Roxana Flores, Noel C Barragan, Karla Gonzalez, Tony Kuo","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibae072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emerging evidence suggests that bi-directional communication and referral pathways, when employed strategically, can lead to favorable health outcomes by connecting patients with complex, multi-faceted health and social needs to appropriate services and resources. However, despite these benefits, patient acceptance of referrals via these pathways remains suboptimal. In this study, we describe individual and clinical factors associated with patient acceptance of these referrals. We extracted individual-level demographic and clinical data for patients referred primarily from a large safety-net health system to a multi-purpose resource hub co-located on the campus of its largest hospital, for the period October 2019 to June 2023. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square analyses, and multinomial regression modeling were performed to examine these data. Of 1865 patients in the study sample, 54.2% accepted a referral, 27.4% were lost to follow-up, and 18.4% declined. Most patients who accepted referrals were female (67.1%), Latino (81.5%), and had hypertension and/or prediabetes or diabetes (84.1%). In modeling analyses, those who accepted referrals tended to be female, and were referred from primary care clinics; many were referred for multiple service/resource categories. We found associations between patient acceptance of referrals and gender and source of referral. Drawing upon these results as well as experience implementing these systems, we propose several practical strategies for increasing successful referrals, including identifying and addressing barriers for patients who declined or were lost to follow-up; using standardized screening tools to routinely assess for multi-faceted health and social needs; increasing provider awareness about the benefits and functioning of these pathways; and monitoring progress so mid-course adjustments can be made when necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual and clinical factors associated with patient acceptance of referrals to social services and community resources at a multi-purpose resource hub.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Green, Roxana Flores, Noel C Barragan, Karla Gonzalez, Tony Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibae072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Emerging evidence suggests that bi-directional communication and referral pathways, when employed strategically, can lead to favorable health outcomes by connecting patients with complex, multi-faceted health and social needs to appropriate services and resources. However, despite these benefits, patient acceptance of referrals via these pathways remains suboptimal. In this study, we describe individual and clinical factors associated with patient acceptance of these referrals. We extracted individual-level demographic and clinical data for patients referred primarily from a large safety-net health system to a multi-purpose resource hub co-located on the campus of its largest hospital, for the period October 2019 to June 2023. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square analyses, and multinomial regression modeling were performed to examine these data. Of 1865 patients in the study sample, 54.2% accepted a referral, 27.4% were lost to follow-up, and 18.4% declined. Most patients who accepted referrals were female (67.1%), Latino (81.5%), and had hypertension and/or prediabetes or diabetes (84.1%). In modeling analyses, those who accepted referrals tended to be female, and were referred from primary care clinics; many were referred for multiple service/resource categories. We found associations between patient acceptance of referrals and gender and source of referral. Drawing upon these results as well as experience implementing these systems, we propose several practical strategies for increasing successful referrals, including identifying and addressing barriers for patients who declined or were lost to follow-up; using standardized screening tools to routinely assess for multi-faceted health and social needs; increasing provider awareness about the benefits and functioning of these pathways; and monitoring progress so mid-course adjustments can be made when necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibae072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibae072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新出现的证据表明,如果策略性地采用双向沟通和转诊途径,可以将具有复杂、多方面健康和社会需求的患者与适当的服务和资源联系起来,从而产生有利的健康结果。然而,尽管有这些好处,通过这些途径转诊的患者接受度仍然不理想。在这项研究中,我们描述了个人和临床因素相关的病人接受这些转诊。我们提取了2019年10月至2023年6月期间,主要从大型安全网卫生系统转介到位于其最大医院校园内的多用途资源中心的患者的个人人口统计学和临床数据。采用描述性统计、卡方分析和多项回归模型对这些数据进行检验。在研究样本中的1865例患者中,54.2%接受转诊,27.4%失去随访,18.4%下降。大多数接受转诊的患者为女性(67.1%),拉丁裔(81.5%),患有高血压和/或糖尿病前期或糖尿病(84.1%)。在建模分析中,接受转诊的人往往是女性,并且是从初级保健诊所转诊的;许多人被推荐为多种服务/资源类别。我们发现患者接受转诊与性别和转诊来源之间存在关联。根据这些结果以及实施这些系统的经验,我们提出了一些实用的策略来增加成功转诊,包括识别和解决拒绝或失去随访的患者的障碍;使用标准化筛查工具,定期评估多方面的健康和社会需求;提高提供者对这些途径的益处和功能的认识;并监测进展情况,以便在必要时进行中途调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual and clinical factors associated with patient acceptance of referrals to social services and community resources at a multi-purpose resource hub.

Emerging evidence suggests that bi-directional communication and referral pathways, when employed strategically, can lead to favorable health outcomes by connecting patients with complex, multi-faceted health and social needs to appropriate services and resources. However, despite these benefits, patient acceptance of referrals via these pathways remains suboptimal. In this study, we describe individual and clinical factors associated with patient acceptance of these referrals. We extracted individual-level demographic and clinical data for patients referred primarily from a large safety-net health system to a multi-purpose resource hub co-located on the campus of its largest hospital, for the period October 2019 to June 2023. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square analyses, and multinomial regression modeling were performed to examine these data. Of 1865 patients in the study sample, 54.2% accepted a referral, 27.4% were lost to follow-up, and 18.4% declined. Most patients who accepted referrals were female (67.1%), Latino (81.5%), and had hypertension and/or prediabetes or diabetes (84.1%). In modeling analyses, those who accepted referrals tended to be female, and were referred from primary care clinics; many were referred for multiple service/resource categories. We found associations between patient acceptance of referrals and gender and source of referral. Drawing upon these results as well as experience implementing these systems, we propose several practical strategies for increasing successful referrals, including identifying and addressing barriers for patients who declined or were lost to follow-up; using standardized screening tools to routinely assess for multi-faceted health and social needs; increasing provider awareness about the benefits and functioning of these pathways; and monitoring progress so mid-course adjustments can be made when necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
期刊最新文献
The Selah trial: A preference-based partially randomized waitlist control study of three stress management interventions. Adaptation of a sleep hygiene intervention for individuals with poor sleep and their companions: Results of a randomized controlled pilot trial. Co-created improvement goals and strategies for implementing SBIRT and MAUD in primary care settings in a facilitator-supported, tailored implementation study. Application of an implementation premortem: A novel qualitative approach leveraging prospective hindsight to enhance barbershop health interventions for Black men. Differing conceptual maps of skills for implementing evidence-based interventions held by community-based organization practitioners and academics: A multidimensional scaling comparison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1