布地奈德/甘炔溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗二水合物三联治疗与双重治疗对COPD和哮喘表型特征患者的影响:一项KRONOS和ETHOS的综合事后分析

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/COPD.S478349
Shigeo Muro, Munehiro Seki, John R Hurst, David Petullo, Jonathan Marshall, Karin Bowen, Patrick F Darken, Elizabeth A Duncan, Ayman Megally, Mehul Patel
{"title":"布地奈德/甘炔溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗二水合物三联治疗与双重治疗对COPD和哮喘表型特征患者的影响:一项KRONOS和ETHOS的综合事后分析","authors":"Shigeo Muro, Munehiro Seki, John R Hurst, David Petullo, Jonathan Marshall, Karin Bowen, Patrick F Darken, Elizabeth A Duncan, Ayman Megally, Mehul Patel","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S478349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) versus dual LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA therapies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and phenotypic features of asthma (bronchodilator reversibility and elevated blood eosinophils), but no asthma diagnosis, for whom treatment guidelines are limited.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>KRONOS (NCT02497001) and ETHOS (NCT02465567) enrolled patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, no current asthma diagnosis, and either ≥0 (KRONOS) or ≥1 (ETHOS) moderate/severe exacerbations in the prior year. This pooled post hoc analysis evaluated trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and FEV<sub>1</sub> area under the curve from hours 0 to 4 (AUC<sub>0-4</sub>) change from baseline over 12-24 weeks, moderate/severe exacerbation rates, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score over 24 weeks with ICS/LAMA/LABA (BGF 320/14.4/10 µg), LAMA/LABA (glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate [GFF] 14.4/10 µg), and ICS/LABA (budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate [BFF] 320/10 µg) in patients with phenotypic features of asthma defined as reversibility to salbutamol and blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>. Analyses were not adjusted for multiplicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BGF improved trough FEV<sub>1</sub> and FEV<sub>1</sub> AUC<sub>0-4</sub> versus GFF (least squares mean [LSM] difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] 125 [39-211] and 153 [59-247] mL) and BFF (LSM difference [95% CI] 118 [30-207] and 146 [49-243] mL). Exacerbation rates were estimated to be lower with BGF versus GFF and BFF (respective rate ratios [95% CI] 0.28 [0.19-0.43] and 0.69 [0.45-1.05]) and SGRQ total score was estimated to be improved with BGF versus GFF and BFF (respective LSM differences [95% CI] -5.18 [-8.11 to -2.24] and -1.09 [-4.08 to 1.91]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BGF was estimated to have benefits on lung function, exacerbations, and health-related quality of life versus dual therapies in patients with COPD and phenotypic features of asthma.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02497001 and NCT02465567.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"2729-2737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triple Therapy with Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate versus Dual Therapies for Patients with COPD and Phenotypic Features of Asthma: A Pooled Post Hoc Analysis of KRONOS and ETHOS.\",\"authors\":\"Shigeo Muro, Munehiro Seki, John R Hurst, David Petullo, Jonathan Marshall, Karin Bowen, Patrick F Darken, Elizabeth A Duncan, Ayman Megally, Mehul Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S478349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) versus dual LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA therapies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and phenotypic features of asthma (bronchodilator reversibility and elevated blood eosinophils), but no asthma diagnosis, for whom treatment guidelines are limited.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>KRONOS (NCT02497001) and ETHOS (NCT02465567) enrolled patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, no current asthma diagnosis, and either ≥0 (KRONOS) or ≥1 (ETHOS) moderate/severe exacerbations in the prior year. This pooled post hoc analysis evaluated trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and FEV<sub>1</sub> area under the curve from hours 0 to 4 (AUC<sub>0-4</sub>) change from baseline over 12-24 weeks, moderate/severe exacerbation rates, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score over 24 weeks with ICS/LAMA/LABA (BGF 320/14.4/10 µg), LAMA/LABA (glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate [GFF] 14.4/10 µg), and ICS/LABA (budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate [BFF] 320/10 µg) in patients with phenotypic features of asthma defined as reversibility to salbutamol and blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>. Analyses were not adjusted for multiplicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BGF improved trough FEV<sub>1</sub> and FEV<sub>1</sub> AUC<sub>0-4</sub> versus GFF (least squares mean [LSM] difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] 125 [39-211] and 153 [59-247] mL) and BFF (LSM difference [95% CI] 118 [30-207] and 146 [49-243] mL). Exacerbation rates were estimated to be lower with BGF versus GFF and BFF (respective rate ratios [95% CI] 0.28 [0.19-0.43] and 0.69 [0.45-1.05]) and SGRQ total score was estimated to be improved with BGF versus GFF and BFF (respective LSM differences [95% CI] -5.18 [-8.11 to -2.24] and -1.09 [-4.08 to 1.91]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BGF was estimated to have benefits on lung function, exacerbations, and health-related quality of life versus dual therapies in patients with COPD and phenotypic features of asthma.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02497001 and NCT02465567.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"2729-2737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S478349\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S478349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们评估了吸入皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β2激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联治疗布地纳德/甘炔溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗二水合物(BGF)与LAMA/LABA和ICS/LABA双重治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘表型特征(支气管扩张剂可逆性和血嗜酸性粒细胞升高)患者的影响,但没有哮喘诊断,治疗指南有限。患者和方法:KRONOS (NCT02497001)和ETHOS (NCT02465567)纳入了中至极重度COPD患者,目前无哮喘诊断,前一年≥0 (KRONOS)或≥1 (ETHOS)中/重度加重。该合并后分析评估了12-24周内1秒强制呼气量(FEV1)和0-4小时曲线下FEV1面积(AUC0-4)与基线的变化,中度/重度加重率,以及24周内ICS/LAMA/LABA (BGF 320/14.4/10µg), LAMA/LABA (glycopyronium /富马酸福摩特罗二水合[GFF] 14.4/10µg)的圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)总分。ICS/LABA(布地奈德/富马酸福莫特罗二水合物[BFF] 320/10µg)在哮喘表型特征定义为沙丁丁醇可逆性和血嗜酸性粒细胞≥300细胞/mm3的患者中。分析没有对多重性进行调整。结果:与GFF相比,BGF通过FEV1和FEV1 AUC0-4得到改善(最小二乘平均[LSM]差[95%置信区间(CI)] 125[39-211]和153 [59-247]mL), BFF (LSM差[95% CI] 118[30-207]和146 [49-243]mL)。与GFF和BFF相比,BGF的恶化率估计更低(各自的比率[95% CI] 0.28[0.19-0.43]和0.69 [0.45-1.05]),SGRQ总分估计BGF与GFF和BFF相比有所改善(各自的LSM差异[95% CI] -5.18[-8.11至-2.24]和-1.09[-4.08至1.91])。结论:与双重治疗相比,BGF对COPD和哮喘表型特征患者的肺功能、加重和健康相关生活质量有益处。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02497001和NCT02465567。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Triple Therapy with Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate versus Dual Therapies for Patients with COPD and Phenotypic Features of Asthma: A Pooled Post Hoc Analysis of KRONOS and ETHOS.

Background: We evaluated the inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) versus dual LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA therapies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and phenotypic features of asthma (bronchodilator reversibility and elevated blood eosinophils), but no asthma diagnosis, for whom treatment guidelines are limited.

Patients and methods: KRONOS (NCT02497001) and ETHOS (NCT02465567) enrolled patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, no current asthma diagnosis, and either ≥0 (KRONOS) or ≥1 (ETHOS) moderate/severe exacerbations in the prior year. This pooled post hoc analysis evaluated trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and FEV1 area under the curve from hours 0 to 4 (AUC0-4) change from baseline over 12-24 weeks, moderate/severe exacerbation rates, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score over 24 weeks with ICS/LAMA/LABA (BGF 320/14.4/10 µg), LAMA/LABA (glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate [GFF] 14.4/10 µg), and ICS/LABA (budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate [BFF] 320/10 µg) in patients with phenotypic features of asthma defined as reversibility to salbutamol and blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/mm3. Analyses were not adjusted for multiplicity.

Results: BGF improved trough FEV1 and FEV1 AUC0-4 versus GFF (least squares mean [LSM] difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] 125 [39-211] and 153 [59-247] mL) and BFF (LSM difference [95% CI] 118 [30-207] and 146 [49-243] mL). Exacerbation rates were estimated to be lower with BGF versus GFF and BFF (respective rate ratios [95% CI] 0.28 [0.19-0.43] and 0.69 [0.45-1.05]) and SGRQ total score was estimated to be improved with BGF versus GFF and BFF (respective LSM differences [95% CI] -5.18 [-8.11 to -2.24] and -1.09 [-4.08 to 1.91]).

Conclusion: BGF was estimated to have benefits on lung function, exacerbations, and health-related quality of life versus dual therapies in patients with COPD and phenotypic features of asthma.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02497001 and NCT02465567.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
期刊最新文献
Hyperkalemia Is an Underestimated Risk Factor in COPD. The Causal Relationship Between Gut and Skin Microbiota and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis. The Impact of Beta-Blockers and Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors on the Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nation-Wide Registry Study. Application of Discrete Event Simulation Models for COPD Management: A Systematic Review. Predictive Value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio/Serum Albumin for All-Cause Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Suffering from COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1