表征患者对地理萎缩生活的感知:全球地理萎缩洞察调查。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S488559
Sophie J Bakri, Christian K Brinkmann, Amy Mulvey, Kathy Steinberg, Roz Katz, Pooja Vatsyayan, Sujata P Sarda, Nancy M Holekamp
{"title":"表征患者对地理萎缩生活的感知:全球地理萎缩洞察调查。","authors":"Sophie J Bakri, Christian K Brinkmann, Amy Mulvey, Kathy Steinberg, Roz Katz, Pooja Vatsyayan, Sujata P Sarda, Nancy M Holekamp","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S488559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of age-related macular degeneration leading to irreversible vision loss and negative impacts on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the experiences of living with GA, the Geographic Atrophy Insights Survey (GAINS) was conducted between October 12, 2021, and December 10, 2021, captured the responses of individuals ≥60 years with a self-reported GA diagnosis residing in the United States, Canada, Australia, and six European countries. Survey questions focused on the perceptions of individuals living with GA and covered six themes: speed of disease progression, effect on independence, impact on quality of life, emotional toll of GA, misconceptions and need for further education about GA, and clinician interactions. An exploratory comparison between participants with unilateral and bilateral GA was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey included 203 individuals with a mean age of 70 years; 42% had bilateral GA. Most respondents (77%) agreed (\"strongly\" or \"somewhat agreed\") that GA impacted their vision faster than expected, and 68% agreed that it is hard to enjoy life fully the way they did before GA diagnosis. Regarding comparisons between individuals with bilateral and unilateral GA, both groups reported similar \"major\" or \"moderate\" negative impacts on their ability to drive (73% vs 75%, respectively), followed by the ability to read (66% vs 71%), and ability to travel as much as they would prefer (62% vs 62%). Among participants, 49% and 56% of respondents with bilateral and unilateral GA, respectively, reported major/moderate negative impacts on self-confidence and 40% of both cohorts reported major/moderate negative impacts on mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey provides further insight on the burden experienced by individuals living with GA. We find similar responses between unilateral and bilateral GA groups, highlighting the impact GA may have on an individual's quality of life even when only one eye is affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3725-3737"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Patient Perceptions of Living with Geographic Atrophy: The Global Geographic Atrophy Insights Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie J Bakri, Christian K Brinkmann, Amy Mulvey, Kathy Steinberg, Roz Katz, Pooja Vatsyayan, Sujata P Sarda, Nancy M Holekamp\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S488559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of age-related macular degeneration leading to irreversible vision loss and negative impacts on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the experiences of living with GA, the Geographic Atrophy Insights Survey (GAINS) was conducted between October 12, 2021, and December 10, 2021, captured the responses of individuals ≥60 years with a self-reported GA diagnosis residing in the United States, Canada, Australia, and six European countries. Survey questions focused on the perceptions of individuals living with GA and covered six themes: speed of disease progression, effect on independence, impact on quality of life, emotional toll of GA, misconceptions and need for further education about GA, and clinician interactions. An exploratory comparison between participants with unilateral and bilateral GA was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey included 203 individuals with a mean age of 70 years; 42% had bilateral GA. Most respondents (77%) agreed (\\\"strongly\\\" or \\\"somewhat agreed\\\") that GA impacted their vision faster than expected, and 68% agreed that it is hard to enjoy life fully the way they did before GA diagnosis. Regarding comparisons between individuals with bilateral and unilateral GA, both groups reported similar \\\"major\\\" or \\\"moderate\\\" negative impacts on their ability to drive (73% vs 75%, respectively), followed by the ability to read (66% vs 71%), and ability to travel as much as they would prefer (62% vs 62%). Among participants, 49% and 56% of respondents with bilateral and unilateral GA, respectively, reported major/moderate negative impacts on self-confidence and 40% of both cohorts reported major/moderate negative impacts on mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey provides further insight on the burden experienced by individuals living with GA. We find similar responses between unilateral and bilateral GA groups, highlighting the impact GA may have on an individual's quality of life even when only one eye is affected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3725-3737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S488559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S488559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:地理萎缩(GA)是老年性黄斑变性的一种晚期形式,可导致不可逆的视力丧失和对生活质量的负面影响。方法:为了评估GA患者的生活经历,在2021年10月12日至2021年12月10日期间进行了地理萎缩洞察调查(GAINS),收集了居住在美国,加拿大,澳大利亚和六个欧洲国家的≥60岁自我报告GA诊断的个体的反应。调查问题集中于对GA患者的看法,涵盖六个主题:疾病进展速度,对独立性的影响,对生活质量的影响,GA的情绪损失,对GA的误解和进一步教育的需要,以及临床医生的互动。对单侧和双侧GA患者进行了探索性比较。结果:调查对象203人,平均年龄70岁;42%为双侧GA。大多数受访者(77%)同意(“强烈”或“有些同意”)GA对他们视力的影响比预期的要快,68%的人同意很难像GA诊断前那样充分享受生活。关于双侧和单侧GA患者之间的比较,两组患者的驾驶能力都受到了类似的“严重”或“中度”负面影响(分别为73%和75%),其次是阅读能力(66%对71%),以及尽可能多地旅行的能力(62%对62%)。在参与者中,分别有49%和56%的双侧和单侧GA的应答者报告了对自信的严重/中度负面影响,两个队列中有40%的人报告了对心理健康的严重/中度负面影响。结论:我们的调查提供了对GA患者所经历的负担的进一步了解。我们发现单侧和双侧GA组之间的反应相似,突出了GA可能对个人生活质量的影响,即使只有一只眼睛受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing Patient Perceptions of Living with Geographic Atrophy: The Global Geographic Atrophy Insights Survey.

Background: Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of age-related macular degeneration leading to irreversible vision loss and negative impacts on quality of life.

Methods: To assess the experiences of living with GA, the Geographic Atrophy Insights Survey (GAINS) was conducted between October 12, 2021, and December 10, 2021, captured the responses of individuals ≥60 years with a self-reported GA diagnosis residing in the United States, Canada, Australia, and six European countries. Survey questions focused on the perceptions of individuals living with GA and covered six themes: speed of disease progression, effect on independence, impact on quality of life, emotional toll of GA, misconceptions and need for further education about GA, and clinician interactions. An exploratory comparison between participants with unilateral and bilateral GA was conducted.

Results: The survey included 203 individuals with a mean age of 70 years; 42% had bilateral GA. Most respondents (77%) agreed ("strongly" or "somewhat agreed") that GA impacted their vision faster than expected, and 68% agreed that it is hard to enjoy life fully the way they did before GA diagnosis. Regarding comparisons between individuals with bilateral and unilateral GA, both groups reported similar "major" or "moderate" negative impacts on their ability to drive (73% vs 75%, respectively), followed by the ability to read (66% vs 71%), and ability to travel as much as they would prefer (62% vs 62%). Among participants, 49% and 56% of respondents with bilateral and unilateral GA, respectively, reported major/moderate negative impacts on self-confidence and 40% of both cohorts reported major/moderate negative impacts on mental health.

Conclusion: Our survey provides further insight on the burden experienced by individuals living with GA. We find similar responses between unilateral and bilateral GA groups, highlighting the impact GA may have on an individual's quality of life even when only one eye is affected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses. Application of the 2021 AAPOS Guidelines in Clinics with Revision and Validation of SPOT Referral Criteria. Clinical Evaluation of Faricimab in Real-World Diabetic Macular Edema in India- A Multicenter Observational Study. Propensity Score to Compare Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckling in Retrospective Studies [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1