限制性处方与开放式处方对血糖控制的影响

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP Pub Date : 2024-11-24 DOI:10.1002/jac5.2048
Tinh Duong Pharm.D., Jeff Jolliff Pharm.D., MBA, Alan Duvall Pharm.D., Raquel Aguirre Pharm.D., David Benjamin Lash Pharm.D., MPH
{"title":"限制性处方与开放式处方对血糖控制的影响","authors":"Tinh Duong Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Jeff Jolliff Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Alan Duvall Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Raquel Aguirre Pharm.D.,&nbsp;David Benjamin Lash Pharm.D., MPH","doi":"10.1002/jac5.2048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom introduced executive order N-01-19, which transitioned California's Medicaid (Medi-Cal) health plan pharmacy benefits from multiple managed care plans to a single-payer system. This transition occurred on January 1, 2022, and Medi-Cal stopped enforcing formulary restrictions for beneficiaries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study compared glycemic control of hemoglobin A1c in a pharmacist-led diabetes clinic during an open versus restrictive formulary.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a retrospective cohort study of Medi-Cal patients seen in a pharmacist-led diabetes clinic at Kern Medical in Bakersfield, California between January 2021 and September 2022. All new patients with type 2 diabetes and an A1c greater than 6.9% seen at the clinic between January and September 2021 were classified as the Restrictive Formulary group and those seen between January and September 2022 were the Open Formulary group. The primary end point was mean change in A1c at first follow-up. Secondary end points included attainment of an A1c &lt;7%, change in weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, and statin use, and change in estimated monthly drug expenditure for glucose-lowering medications per patient. Safety end points included diabetes-related visits to Kern Medical's emergency room and hospitalizations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>While both the Restrictive and Open Formulary groups had significant reductions in mean A1c from a baseline of −0.74 ± 2.1 (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and − 2.7 ± 2.4 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), respectively, the magnitude of A1c reduction was greater in the Open group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). For secondary outcomes, the Open group saw a higher utilization of agents with known cardiovascular and renal benefits. The Open group had a modest weight reduction (−2.5 kg ± 4.4 kg, <i>p</i> = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the cost of diabetes therapy between the two groups (<i>p =</i> 0.12).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>An open formulary resulted in better glycemic control without significantly increasing the average monthly cost of diabetes medications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 12","pages":"1154-1162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Restrictive Formulary on glycemic control compared with an Open Formulary\",\"authors\":\"Tinh Duong Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Jeff Jolliff Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Alan Duvall Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Raquel Aguirre Pharm.D.,&nbsp;David Benjamin Lash Pharm.D., MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jac5.2048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>In 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom introduced executive order N-01-19, which transitioned California's Medicaid (Medi-Cal) health plan pharmacy benefits from multiple managed care plans to a single-payer system. This transition occurred on January 1, 2022, and Medi-Cal stopped enforcing formulary restrictions for beneficiaries.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study compared glycemic control of hemoglobin A1c in a pharmacist-led diabetes clinic during an open versus restrictive formulary.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a retrospective cohort study of Medi-Cal patients seen in a pharmacist-led diabetes clinic at Kern Medical in Bakersfield, California between January 2021 and September 2022. All new patients with type 2 diabetes and an A1c greater than 6.9% seen at the clinic between January and September 2021 were classified as the Restrictive Formulary group and those seen between January and September 2022 were the Open Formulary group. The primary end point was mean change in A1c at first follow-up. Secondary end points included attainment of an A1c &lt;7%, change in weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, and statin use, and change in estimated monthly drug expenditure for glucose-lowering medications per patient. Safety end points included diabetes-related visits to Kern Medical's emergency room and hospitalizations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>While both the Restrictive and Open Formulary groups had significant reductions in mean A1c from a baseline of −0.74 ± 2.1 (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and − 2.7 ± 2.4 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), respectively, the magnitude of A1c reduction was greater in the Open group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). For secondary outcomes, the Open group saw a higher utilization of agents with known cardiovascular and renal benefits. The Open group had a modest weight reduction (−2.5 kg ± 4.4 kg, <i>p</i> = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the cost of diabetes therapy between the two groups (<i>p =</i> 0.12).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>An open formulary resulted in better glycemic control without significantly increasing the average monthly cost of diabetes medications.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"volume\":\"7 12\",\"pages\":\"1154-1162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,加州州长加文·纽森(Gavin Newsom)发布了N-01-19号行政命令,将加州医疗补助计划(Medi-Cal)的药品福利从多个管理式医疗计划转变为单一付款人系统。这一转变发生在2022年1月1日,加州医保停止了对受益人的规定限制。目的:本研究比较了药剂师主导的糖尿病诊所在开放处方和限制处方期间的糖化血红蛋白的血糖控制情况。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2021年1月至2022年9月期间在加州贝克斯菲尔德Kern Medical药剂师领导的糖尿病诊所就诊的Medi-Cal患者。所有在2021年1月至9月期间就诊且A1c大于6.9%的2型糖尿病新患者被归类为限制性处方组,2022年1月至9月期间就诊的患者被归类为开放式处方组。主要终点是第一次随访时A1c的平均变化。次要终点包括糖化血红蛋白(A1c)达到7%,体重、血压、胆固醇和他汀类药物使用的变化,以及每个患者每月估计的降糖药物支出的变化。安全性终点包括与糖尿病相关的Kern医疗急诊室就诊和住院。结果:虽然限制处方组和开放处方组的平均糖化血红蛋白均较基线显著降低,分别为- 0.74±2.1 (p = 0.02)和- 2.7±2.4 (p < 0.001),但开放处方组的糖化血红蛋白降低幅度更大(p < 0.001)。对于次要结果,开放组看到了具有已知心血管和肾脏益处的药物的更高利用率。Open组有适度的体重减轻(- 2.5 kg±4.4 kg, p = 0.027)。两组糖尿病治疗费用无显著差异(p = 0.12)。结论:开放处方可以更好地控制血糖,但不会显著增加糖尿病药物的月平均费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of a Restrictive Formulary on glycemic control compared with an Open Formulary

Introduction

In 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom introduced executive order N-01-19, which transitioned California's Medicaid (Medi-Cal) health plan pharmacy benefits from multiple managed care plans to a single-payer system. This transition occurred on January 1, 2022, and Medi-Cal stopped enforcing formulary restrictions for beneficiaries.

Objectives

This study compared glycemic control of hemoglobin A1c in a pharmacist-led diabetes clinic during an open versus restrictive formulary.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of Medi-Cal patients seen in a pharmacist-led diabetes clinic at Kern Medical in Bakersfield, California between January 2021 and September 2022. All new patients with type 2 diabetes and an A1c greater than 6.9% seen at the clinic between January and September 2021 were classified as the Restrictive Formulary group and those seen between January and September 2022 were the Open Formulary group. The primary end point was mean change in A1c at first follow-up. Secondary end points included attainment of an A1c <7%, change in weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, and statin use, and change in estimated monthly drug expenditure for glucose-lowering medications per patient. Safety end points included diabetes-related visits to Kern Medical's emergency room and hospitalizations.

Results

While both the Restrictive and Open Formulary groups had significant reductions in mean A1c from a baseline of −0.74 ± 2.1 (p = 0.02) and − 2.7 ± 2.4 (p < 0.001), respectively, the magnitude of A1c reduction was greater in the Open group (p < 0.001). For secondary outcomes, the Open group saw a higher utilization of agents with known cardiovascular and renal benefits. The Open group had a modest weight reduction (−2.5 kg ± 4.4 kg, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the cost of diabetes therapy between the two groups (p = 0.12).

Conclusions

An open formulary resulted in better glycemic control without significantly increasing the average monthly cost of diabetes medications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Teaching experiences in pharmacy residency Comment on “Pharmacists should be held to high standards, not hindered by bright-line rules” Not just a collection of papers Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1