危重肥胖成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者连续、固定剂量阿曲库铵输液对体重给药策略的反应评价

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Annals of Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1177/10600280241304406
Krishn S Patel, Gretchen L Sacha, Heather Torbic, Stephanie Bass, Lu Wang, Abhijit Duggal, Michael A Rudoni
{"title":"危重肥胖成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者连续、固定剂量阿曲库铵输液对体重给药策略的反应评价","authors":"Krishn S Patel, Gretchen L Sacha, Heather Torbic, Stephanie Bass, Lu Wang, Abhijit Duggal, Michael A Rudoni","doi":"10.1177/10600280241304406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fixed-rate infusions of weight-based neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were adopted during the COVID pandemic to limit caregiver exposure during titrations. Although fixed-rate infusions are supported in studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the optimal scalar for weight-based NMBAs in patients with obesity remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to compare change in oxygenation using two weight-based dosing strategies for atracurium in obese patients with ARDS. Secondary outcomes included total atracurium dose, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilator-free days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following an institutional practice update to use ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with obesity, we retrospectively compared adults (≥18 years) with ARDS and a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who received atracurium (15 µg/kg/min) based on actual body weight (ABW) with those using IBW. The primary outcome was change in PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio (P/F) 48 hours after atracurium initiation. Analysis-of-covariance compared change in P/F between groups after adjustment for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IBW group (<i>n</i> = 123), compared with the ABW group (<i>n</i> = 133), had lower baseline P/F (85.0 [71.0, 118.3] vs 93.3 [76.0, 128.3], <i>P</i> = 0.025) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (9.7 ± 2.6 vs 10.5 ± 2.6, <i>P</i> = 0.015), with greater use of steroids (96% vs 89%, <i>P</i> = 0.032) and prone positioning (72% vs 58%, <i>P</i> = 0.015). No difference was detected in change in P/F at 48 hours (adjusted least squares mean [95% confidence interval, CI]: 55.8 [37.0, 74.5] vs 56.9 [39.6, 74.1], <i>P</i> = 0.90). Atracurium doses were higher in the ABW group (97.4 mg/h [84.4, 110.3] vs 55.4 [47.2, 65.7], <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and ICU-free days or ventilator-free days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In patients with obesity with ARDS receiving fixed-rate atracurium infusions, the change in P/F at 48 hours did not differ based on weight. Atracurium dosed on IBW may use less total drug without compromising ability to improve oxygenation. This is the first study comparing the dosing weight used for continuous infusion atracurium in hospitalized, critically ill ARDS patients with obesity. Additional studies are warranted to optimize dosing in obese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280241304406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Response to Weight-based Dosing Strategies of Continuous, Fixed-Rate Atracurium Infusions in Critically Ill, Obese Adults With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Krishn S Patel, Gretchen L Sacha, Heather Torbic, Stephanie Bass, Lu Wang, Abhijit Duggal, Michael A Rudoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280241304406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fixed-rate infusions of weight-based neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were adopted during the COVID pandemic to limit caregiver exposure during titrations. Although fixed-rate infusions are supported in studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the optimal scalar for weight-based NMBAs in patients with obesity remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to compare change in oxygenation using two weight-based dosing strategies for atracurium in obese patients with ARDS. Secondary outcomes included total atracurium dose, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilator-free days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following an institutional practice update to use ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with obesity, we retrospectively compared adults (≥18 years) with ARDS and a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> who received atracurium (15 µg/kg/min) based on actual body weight (ABW) with those using IBW. The primary outcome was change in PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio (P/F) 48 hours after atracurium initiation. Analysis-of-covariance compared change in P/F between groups after adjustment for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IBW group (<i>n</i> = 123), compared with the ABW group (<i>n</i> = 133), had lower baseline P/F (85.0 [71.0, 118.3] vs 93.3 [76.0, 128.3], <i>P</i> = 0.025) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (9.7 ± 2.6 vs 10.5 ± 2.6, <i>P</i> = 0.015), with greater use of steroids (96% vs 89%, <i>P</i> = 0.032) and prone positioning (72% vs 58%, <i>P</i> = 0.015). No difference was detected in change in P/F at 48 hours (adjusted least squares mean [95% confidence interval, CI]: 55.8 [37.0, 74.5] vs 56.9 [39.6, 74.1], <i>P</i> = 0.90). Atracurium doses were higher in the ABW group (97.4 mg/h [84.4, 110.3] vs 55.4 [47.2, 65.7], <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and ICU-free days or ventilator-free days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In patients with obesity with ARDS receiving fixed-rate atracurium infusions, the change in P/F at 48 hours did not differ based on weight. Atracurium dosed on IBW may use less total drug without compromising ability to improve oxygenation. This is the first study comparing the dosing weight used for continuous infusion atracurium in hospitalized, critically ill ARDS patients with obesity. Additional studies are warranted to optimize dosing in obese patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10600280241304406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241304406\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241304406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在COVID大流行期间,采用固定速率输注基于体重的神经肌肉阻滞剂(nmba),以限制滴定期间护理人员的暴露。尽管在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的研究中支持固定速率输注,但肥胖患者基于体重的NMBAs的最佳标量仍然存在争议。目的:本研究旨在比较肥胖ARDS患者使用两种基于体重的阿曲库铵给药策略时氧合的变化。次要结局包括阿曲库铵总剂量、死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)和无呼吸机天数。方法:根据机构实践更新,将理想体重(IBW)用于肥胖患者,我们回顾性比较了患有ARDS且体重指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m2的成人(≥18岁),根据实际体重(ABW)接受阿曲库ium(15µg/kg/min)治疗与使用IBW治疗的患者。主要终点是阿曲库铵起始48小时后PaO2/FiO2比值(P/F)的变化。协方差分析比较了校正混杂因素后各组间P/F的变化。结果:IBW组(n = 123)与ABW组(n = 133)相比,基线P/F (85.0 [71.0, 118.3] vs 93.3 [76.0, 128.3], P = 0.025)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(9.7±2.6 vs 10.5±2.6,P = 0.015)较低,类固醇使用较多(96% vs 89%, P = 0.032)和俯卧位(72% vs 58%, P = 0.015)。48小时P/F变化无差异(校正最小二乘平均值[95%置信区间,CI]: 55.8 [37.0, 74.5] vs 56.9 [39.6, 74.1], P = 0.90)。ABW组阿曲库铵剂量较高(97.4 mg/h [84.4, 110.3] vs 55.4 mg/h [47.2, 65.7], P < 0.001)。住院死亡率、ICU死亡率、无ICU天数或无呼吸机天数均无差异。结论及相关性:在接受固定速率阿曲库铵输注的肥胖合并ARDS患者中,48小时P/F的变化没有因体重而异。在IBW上使用阿曲库铵可以使用较少的总药物而不影响改善氧合的能力。这是第一个比较住院重症ARDS合并肥胖患者持续输注阿曲库铵的剂量重量的研究。需要进一步的研究来优化肥胖患者的用药剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Response to Weight-based Dosing Strategies of Continuous, Fixed-Rate Atracurium Infusions in Critically Ill, Obese Adults With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Background: Fixed-rate infusions of weight-based neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were adopted during the COVID pandemic to limit caregiver exposure during titrations. Although fixed-rate infusions are supported in studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the optimal scalar for weight-based NMBAs in patients with obesity remains controversial.

Objective: This study sought to compare change in oxygenation using two weight-based dosing strategies for atracurium in obese patients with ARDS. Secondary outcomes included total atracurium dose, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) and ventilator-free days.

Methods: Following an institutional practice update to use ideal body weight (IBW) for patients with obesity, we retrospectively compared adults (≥18 years) with ARDS and a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 who received atracurium (15 µg/kg/min) based on actual body weight (ABW) with those using IBW. The primary outcome was change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F) 48 hours after atracurium initiation. Analysis-of-covariance compared change in P/F between groups after adjustment for confounders.

Results: The IBW group (n = 123), compared with the ABW group (n = 133), had lower baseline P/F (85.0 [71.0, 118.3] vs 93.3 [76.0, 128.3], P = 0.025) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (9.7 ± 2.6 vs 10.5 ± 2.6, P = 0.015), with greater use of steroids (96% vs 89%, P = 0.032) and prone positioning (72% vs 58%, P = 0.015). No difference was detected in change in P/F at 48 hours (adjusted least squares mean [95% confidence interval, CI]: 55.8 [37.0, 74.5] vs 56.9 [39.6, 74.1], P = 0.90). Atracurium doses were higher in the ABW group (97.4 mg/h [84.4, 110.3] vs 55.4 [47.2, 65.7], P < 0.001). There was no difference in hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and ICU-free days or ventilator-free days.

Conclusion and relevance: In patients with obesity with ARDS receiving fixed-rate atracurium infusions, the change in P/F at 48 hours did not differ based on weight. Atracurium dosed on IBW may use less total drug without compromising ability to improve oxygenation. This is the first study comparing the dosing weight used for continuous infusion atracurium in hospitalized, critically ill ARDS patients with obesity. Additional studies are warranted to optimize dosing in obese patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
期刊最新文献
Outcome of Drug-Induced Parkinsonism in the Elderly: A Permanent Nonprogressive Parkinsonian Syndrome May Occur Following Discontinuation of Cinnarizine and Flunarizine. Review of Subcutaneous Insulin Regimens in the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Adults and Pediatrics. Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Genitourinary Infections at HbA1c ≥10%: A Population Health-Based Retrospective Review. Effect of Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Medications on Depression Risk: An Analysis of NHANES Data. Therapeutic Enoxaparin Dosing in Obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1