澳大利亚精神卫生和相关系统中卫生信息的收集和共享:获得精神卫生服务的人的观点。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06347-1
Anne Honey, Nicola Hancock, Helen Glover, Justin Newton Scanlan, Yidan Cao, Andrew Povolny, Mark Orr, Grenville Rose, Sumathi Govindasamy, Lorraine Smith, Naseem Ahmadapour
{"title":"澳大利亚精神卫生和相关系统中卫生信息的收集和共享:获得精神卫生服务的人的观点。","authors":"Anne Honey, Nicola Hancock, Helen Glover, Justin Newton Scanlan, Yidan Cao, Andrew Povolny, Mark Orr, Grenville Rose, Sumathi Govindasamy, Lorraine Smith, Naseem Ahmadapour","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06347-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Information sharing and information privacy are important issues in mental health services. Yet the perspectives of Australians who access mental health services about these issues are poorly understood. This article addresses the research question: What are the concerns of people who use mental health services about the collection and use of their health information in mental health and related systems in Australia?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 16 people who had accessed mental health services and were involved in a series of co-design workshops as part of a larger study. Focused group activities were conducted in which participants were asked to discuss and create a visual map to describe their collective experiences of sharing information relating to mental health and recovery. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and the coding techniques of constant comparative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants expressed a sense of unknowability about the information held and accessed by various organisations. They described providing information to a wide variety of entities, though not always in a free or informed way. They believed other information held about them had been generated and/or shared by people other than themselves, often without their knowledge or consent. Participants reported that both the collection and storage of this information involved risks for them, and they sometimes restricted the information they provided. To improve their comfort with the use of their information, participants recommended customised and transparent information collection; individuals' access and input to their own information; and use of information only for their benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trust is key to positive experiences of information provision and information sharing. Central to establishing trust are transparent practices that facilitate greater choice and control.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collection and sharing of health information in mental health and related systems in Australia: perspectives of people who access mental health services.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Honey, Nicola Hancock, Helen Glover, Justin Newton Scanlan, Yidan Cao, Andrew Povolny, Mark Orr, Grenville Rose, Sumathi Govindasamy, Lorraine Smith, Naseem Ahmadapour\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-024-06347-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Information sharing and information privacy are important issues in mental health services. Yet the perspectives of Australians who access mental health services about these issues are poorly understood. This article addresses the research question: What are the concerns of people who use mental health services about the collection and use of their health information in mental health and related systems in Australia?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 16 people who had accessed mental health services and were involved in a series of co-design workshops as part of a larger study. Focused group activities were conducted in which participants were asked to discuss and create a visual map to describe their collective experiences of sharing information relating to mental health and recovery. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and the coding techniques of constant comparative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants expressed a sense of unknowability about the information held and accessed by various organisations. They described providing information to a wide variety of entities, though not always in a free or informed way. They believed other information held about them had been generated and/or shared by people other than themselves, often without their knowledge or consent. Participants reported that both the collection and storage of this information involved risks for them, and they sometimes restricted the information they provided. To improve their comfort with the use of their information, participants recommended customised and transparent information collection; individuals' access and input to their own information; and use of information only for their benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trust is key to positive experiences of information provision and information sharing. Central to establishing trust are transparent practices that facilitate greater choice and control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656865/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06347-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06347-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:信息共享和信息隐私是精神卫生服务中的重要问题。然而,获得心理健康服务的澳大利亚人对这些问题的看法却知之甚少。这篇文章解决了研究问题:在澳大利亚的心理健康和相关系统中,使用心理健康服务的人对他们的健康信息的收集和使用有什么关注?方法:参与者是16人,他们接受过心理健康服务,并参与了一系列共同设计研讨会,作为一项更大研究的一部分。进行了重点小组活动,要求参与者讨论并创建一个视觉地图,以描述他们分享与心理健康和康复有关的信息的集体经验。采用定性内容分析和恒比分析编码技术对数据进行分析。结果:参与者对各种组织持有和访问的信息表达了一种不可知感。他们描述了向各种各样的实体提供信息,尽管并不总是以免费或知情的方式。他们认为,关于他们的其他信息是由其他人生成和/或分享的,通常是在他们不知情或不同意的情况下。与会者报告说,这些信息的收集和储存对他们都有风险,他们有时会限制所提供的信息。为了提高他们对信息使用的舒适度,参与者建议定制和透明的信息收集;个人对自己信息的获取和输入;并且只为了自己的利益而使用信息。结论:信任是信息提供和信息共享的积极体验的关键。建立信任的核心是促进更多选择和控制的透明做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collection and sharing of health information in mental health and related systems in Australia: perspectives of people who access mental health services.

Background: Information sharing and information privacy are important issues in mental health services. Yet the perspectives of Australians who access mental health services about these issues are poorly understood. This article addresses the research question: What are the concerns of people who use mental health services about the collection and use of their health information in mental health and related systems in Australia?

Methods: Participants were 16 people who had accessed mental health services and were involved in a series of co-design workshops as part of a larger study. Focused group activities were conducted in which participants were asked to discuss and create a visual map to describe their collective experiences of sharing information relating to mental health and recovery. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and the coding techniques of constant comparative analysis.

Results: Participants expressed a sense of unknowability about the information held and accessed by various organisations. They described providing information to a wide variety of entities, though not always in a free or informed way. They believed other information held about them had been generated and/or shared by people other than themselves, often without their knowledge or consent. Participants reported that both the collection and storage of this information involved risks for them, and they sometimes restricted the information they provided. To improve their comfort with the use of their information, participants recommended customised and transparent information collection; individuals' access and input to their own information; and use of information only for their benefit.

Conclusions: Trust is key to positive experiences of information provision and information sharing. Central to establishing trust are transparent practices that facilitate greater choice and control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
CareVR, a Virtual Reality assisted communication training programme to support informal carers of people with psychosis: a feasibility study. Effect of parallel adolescent and parent dialectical behavior therapy skills training vs. adolescent-only skills training on nonsuicidal self-injury: a pilot randomized trial. Cost-utility analysis of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation as adjunctive therapies in Chinese patients with major depressive disorder. Factors related to employment across vocational levels in patients with schizophrenia: focus on subminimum wage non-competitive employment. Co-existence of clinical high-risk for psychosis and bipolar disorder: a multi-dimensional psychopathological analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1