FAERS中的数据挖掘:新一代h1 -抗组胺药与神经系统疾病的关联。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s40360-024-00822-x
Weiping Hu, Hailong Li, Linan Zeng, Jing Gan, Chenghong Feng, Li Chen, Lingli Zhang
{"title":"FAERS中的数据挖掘:新一代h1 -抗组胺药与神经系统疾病的关联。","authors":"Weiping Hu, Hailong Li, Linan Zeng, Jing Gan, Chenghong Feng, Li Chen, Lingli Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40360-024-00822-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>H1-antihistamines are widely used to treat symptoms depending on histamine release in a variety of conditions. However, neurological adverse events have been reported in post-marketing surveillance studies and there are limited literatures comparing the neurological disorders associated with newer-generation H1-antihistamines from real-world datasets.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We performed a comparative analysis of nervous system disorders and several newer-generation H1-antihistamines including: cetirizine, loratadine, levocetirizine, desloratadine and fexofenadine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was used to identify the suspected drug neurological adverse events associated with H1-antihistamines of interest via the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR), χ<sup>2</sup> (chi-square) and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AE reports of 43,815 cases from 2017 to 2021 were extracted from FAERS. The H1-antihistamines included in our study were associated with various neurological adverse events that could be classified into 12 aspects, containing 42 preferred terms. The majority of adverse event reports were concentrated at somnolence: cetirizine [N = 1342, ROR (95%CI) = 11.8 (11.2-12.5), PRR = 10.8, χ<sup>2</sup> = 11755.4], levocetirizine [N = 1276, ROR(95%CI) = 28.5 (26.7-30.3), PRR = 22.7, χ<sup>2</sup> = 26218.4], loratadine[N = 516, ROR(95%CI) = 4.6 (4.2-5.0), PRR = 4.4, χ<sup>2</sup> = 1378.1], desloratadine [N = 33, ROR(95%CI) = 6.1 (4.3-8.6), PRR = 5.8, χ<sup>2</sup> = 131.9], fexofenadine [N = 498, ROR(95%CI) = 5.0 (4.6-5.5), PRR = 4.8, χ<sup>2</sup> = 1519.0].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neurological AEs associated with individual newer generation H1-antihistamines of interest varies a lot, whereas somnolence was the most common AE reports. Fexofenadine was highly associated with headaches. Sedative effects associated with levocetirizine and cetirizine should arouse more concern. Seizures significantly associated with levocetirizine and desloratadine were infrequently reported, further research is needed to avoid possible serious outcomes. Patients taking cetirizine probably have higher risk of dystonia and anticholinergic syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"25 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data mining in FAERS: association of newer-generation H1-antihistamines with nervous system disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Weiping Hu, Hailong Li, Linan Zeng, Jing Gan, Chenghong Feng, Li Chen, Lingli Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40360-024-00822-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>H1-antihistamines are widely used to treat symptoms depending on histamine release in a variety of conditions. However, neurological adverse events have been reported in post-marketing surveillance studies and there are limited literatures comparing the neurological disorders associated with newer-generation H1-antihistamines from real-world datasets.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We performed a comparative analysis of nervous system disorders and several newer-generation H1-antihistamines including: cetirizine, loratadine, levocetirizine, desloratadine and fexofenadine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was used to identify the suspected drug neurological adverse events associated with H1-antihistamines of interest via the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR), χ<sup>2</sup> (chi-square) and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AE reports of 43,815 cases from 2017 to 2021 were extracted from FAERS. The H1-antihistamines included in our study were associated with various neurological adverse events that could be classified into 12 aspects, containing 42 preferred terms. The majority of adverse event reports were concentrated at somnolence: cetirizine [N = 1342, ROR (95%CI) = 11.8 (11.2-12.5), PRR = 10.8, χ<sup>2</sup> = 11755.4], levocetirizine [N = 1276, ROR(95%CI) = 28.5 (26.7-30.3), PRR = 22.7, χ<sup>2</sup> = 26218.4], loratadine[N = 516, ROR(95%CI) = 4.6 (4.2-5.0), PRR = 4.4, χ<sup>2</sup> = 1378.1], desloratadine [N = 33, ROR(95%CI) = 6.1 (4.3-8.6), PRR = 5.8, χ<sup>2</sup> = 131.9], fexofenadine [N = 498, ROR(95%CI) = 5.0 (4.6-5.5), PRR = 4.8, χ<sup>2</sup> = 1519.0].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neurological AEs associated with individual newer generation H1-antihistamines of interest varies a lot, whereas somnolence was the most common AE reports. Fexofenadine was highly associated with headaches. Sedative effects associated with levocetirizine and cetirizine should arouse more concern. Seizures significantly associated with levocetirizine and desloratadine were infrequently reported, further research is needed to avoid possible serious outcomes. Patients taking cetirizine probably have higher risk of dystonia and anticholinergic syndrome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656970/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00822-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00822-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:h1 -抗组胺药被广泛用于治疗各种情况下依赖于组胺释放的症状。然而,在上市后监测研究中已经报道了神经系统不良事件,并且比较新一代h1 -抗组胺药相关神经系统疾病的文献有限。目的:我们对新一代h1抗组胺药西替利嗪、氯雷他定、左西替利嗪、地氯雷他定和非索非那定对神经系统疾病的影响进行了比较分析。方法:通过美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统,采用歧化分析来识别疑似与h1 -抗组胺药相关的药物神经系统不良事件。采用比例报告比(PRR)、χ2(卡方)和报告优势比(ROR)(95%置信区间(CI))来估计相关性。结果:从FAERS中提取了2017 - 2021年43815例AE报告。我们研究中的h1 -抗组胺药与各种神经系统不良事件相关,可分为12个方面,包含42个首选术语。不良事件报告的大部分集中在嗜睡:西替利嗪(N = 1342, ROR (95% ci) = 11.8(11.2 - -12.5)、PRR = 10.8,χ2 = 11755.4),levocetirizine (N = 1276, ROR (95% ci) = 28.5(26.7 - -30.3)、PRR = 22.7,χ2 = 26218.4),氯雷他定(N = 516, ROR (95% ci) = 4.6(4.2 - -5.0)、PRR = 4.4,χ2 = 1378.1)、地氯雷他定(N = 33岁的ROR (95% ci) = 6.1(4.3 - -8.6)、PRR = 5.8,χ2 = 131.9),盐酸非索非那定(N = 498, ROR (95% ci) = 5.0(4.6 - -5.5)、PRR = 4.8,χ2 = 1519.0)。结论:与新一代h1 -抗组胺药相关的神经学AE有很大差异,而嗜睡是最常见的AE报告。非索非那定与头痛高度相关。左西替利嗪和西替利嗪的镇静作用应引起更多关注。与左西替利嗪和地氯雷他定显著相关的癫痫发作很少报道,需要进一步研究以避免可能的严重后果。服用西替利嗪的患者可能有较高的肌张力障碍和抗胆碱能综合征的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Data mining in FAERS: association of newer-generation H1-antihistamines with nervous system disorders.

Background: H1-antihistamines are widely used to treat symptoms depending on histamine release in a variety of conditions. However, neurological adverse events have been reported in post-marketing surveillance studies and there are limited literatures comparing the neurological disorders associated with newer-generation H1-antihistamines from real-world datasets.

Aims: We performed a comparative analysis of nervous system disorders and several newer-generation H1-antihistamines including: cetirizine, loratadine, levocetirizine, desloratadine and fexofenadine.

Methods: Disproportionality analysis was used to identify the suspected drug neurological adverse events associated with H1-antihistamines of interest via the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR), χ2 (chi-square) and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the association.

Results: AE reports of 43,815 cases from 2017 to 2021 were extracted from FAERS. The H1-antihistamines included in our study were associated with various neurological adverse events that could be classified into 12 aspects, containing 42 preferred terms. The majority of adverse event reports were concentrated at somnolence: cetirizine [N = 1342, ROR (95%CI) = 11.8 (11.2-12.5), PRR = 10.8, χ2 = 11755.4], levocetirizine [N = 1276, ROR(95%CI) = 28.5 (26.7-30.3), PRR = 22.7, χ2 = 26218.4], loratadine[N = 516, ROR(95%CI) = 4.6 (4.2-5.0), PRR = 4.4, χ2 = 1378.1], desloratadine [N = 33, ROR(95%CI) = 6.1 (4.3-8.6), PRR = 5.8, χ2 = 131.9], fexofenadine [N = 498, ROR(95%CI) = 5.0 (4.6-5.5), PRR = 4.8, χ2 = 1519.0].

Conclusion: Neurological AEs associated with individual newer generation H1-antihistamines of interest varies a lot, whereas somnolence was the most common AE reports. Fexofenadine was highly associated with headaches. Sedative effects associated with levocetirizine and cetirizine should arouse more concern. Seizures significantly associated with levocetirizine and desloratadine were infrequently reported, further research is needed to avoid possible serious outcomes. Patients taking cetirizine probably have higher risk of dystonia and anticholinergic syndrome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the potential biological mechanisms of geniposide on renal fibrosis by network pharmacology and experimental verification. In vivo toxicological evaluation of 3-benzylideneindolin-2-one: antifungal activity against clinical isolates of dermatophytes. Conditioned medium from human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuates cardiac injury induced by Movento in male rats: role of oxidative stress and inflammation. Effect of combination therapy of methylfolate with antidepressants in patients with depressive disorder. Investigation of the protective effects of dichloroacetic acid in a rat model of diabetic neuropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1