间歇性外斜视的非手术治疗:系统回顾和网络分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s12886-024-03804-z
Desheng Song, Yanqiu Ma, Hua Ji, Qing Zhou, Haixia Cheng
{"title":"间歇性外斜视的非手术治疗:系统回顾和网络分析。","authors":"Desheng Song, Yanqiu Ma, Hua Ji, Qing Zhou, Haixia Cheng","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03804-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of various non-surgical treatments for intermittent exotropia(IXT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to June 2024. Following independent screening, data extraction, and bias assessment by two researchers, network meta-analysis was conducted using R 4.2.2 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 RCTs involving 1411 patients were included. Treatment options included overminus lenses (OML), conventional prisms(base-in prism) (CP), part time occlusion (PTO), and binocular vision training (BVT). OML demonstrated superior efficacy in improving distance and near control(1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22 ∼ 1.8); 0.67, 95% CI :0.027 ∼ 1.2), as well as reducing near exodeviation compared to observation(4.5, 95% CI, 1.9 ∼ 6.9), but failed to reduce distance angle of deviation(3.2, 95%CI, -1.1 ∼ 6.4). No significant effect in improving control and reducing exodeviation angle at both distance and near was observed in PTO, BVT, and CP. Probability ranking indicated that the top-ranking three non-surgical interventions were OML, BVT and PTO for improving distance control and reducing near exodeviation; the top three non-surgical interventions for reducing distance exodevition were OML, PTO and BVT; the best non-surgical intervention for improving near control was OML, BVT、 PTO and CP have similar effects. The four non-surgical treatments had no significant impact on near stereoacuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, OML ranks first among the four conservative treatment methods. These four commonly used non-surgical interventions did not significantly impact near stereoacuity. Clinicians should tailor personalized treatment strategies for patients with intermittent exotropia based on disease severity, characteristics, efficacy, and cost considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"24 1","pages":"527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-surgical therapy for intermittent exotropia: a systematic review and network analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Desheng Song, Yanqiu Ma, Hua Ji, Qing Zhou, Haixia Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12886-024-03804-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of various non-surgical treatments for intermittent exotropia(IXT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to June 2024. Following independent screening, data extraction, and bias assessment by two researchers, network meta-analysis was conducted using R 4.2.2 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 RCTs involving 1411 patients were included. Treatment options included overminus lenses (OML), conventional prisms(base-in prism) (CP), part time occlusion (PTO), and binocular vision training (BVT). OML demonstrated superior efficacy in improving distance and near control(1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22 ∼ 1.8); 0.67, 95% CI :0.027 ∼ 1.2), as well as reducing near exodeviation compared to observation(4.5, 95% CI, 1.9 ∼ 6.9), but failed to reduce distance angle of deviation(3.2, 95%CI, -1.1 ∼ 6.4). No significant effect in improving control and reducing exodeviation angle at both distance and near was observed in PTO, BVT, and CP. Probability ranking indicated that the top-ranking three non-surgical interventions were OML, BVT and PTO for improving distance control and reducing near exodeviation; the top three non-surgical interventions for reducing distance exodevition were OML, PTO and BVT; the best non-surgical intervention for improving near control was OML, BVT、 PTO and CP have similar effects. The four non-surgical treatments had no significant impact on near stereoacuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, OML ranks first among the four conservative treatment methods. These four commonly used non-surgical interventions did not significantly impact near stereoacuity. Clinicians should tailor personalized treatment strategies for patients with intermittent exotropia based on disease severity, characteristics, efficacy, and cost considerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657624/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03804-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03804-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析,评价各种非手术治疗间歇性外斜视(IXT)的疗效。方法:对PubMed、EMbase和Cochrane Library数据库进行全面检索,以确定截至2024年6月的相关随机对照试验(rct)。经两位研究者独立筛选、数据提取、偏倚评估后,采用r4.2.2软件进行网络meta分析。结果:共纳入11项rct,涉及1411例患者。治疗方案包括超减镜片(OML)、常规棱镜(基片棱镜)(CP)、部分时间遮挡(PTO)和双眼视觉训练(BVT)。OML在改善距离和近距离控制方面表现出卓越的疗效(1.1,95%可信区间(CI), 0.22 ~ 1.8);0.67, 95%CI:0.027 ~ 1.2),以及与观测值相比减少近外偏差(4.5,95%CI, 1.9 ~ 6.9),但未能减少距离偏差角(3.2,95%CI, -1.1 ~ 6.4)。PTO、BVT和CP在改善距离控制和减少近距离外偏角度方面均无显著效果。概率排序显示,OML、BVT和PTO在改善距离控制和减少近距离外偏角度方面排名前三;减少距离外偏的非手术干预前三位为OML、PTO和BVT;改善近控制的最佳非手术干预是OML, BVT、PTO和CP效果相似。四种非手术治疗对近立体视力无明显影响。结论:总体而言,OML在4种保守治疗方法中排名第一。这四种常用的非手术干预对近立体视力没有显著影响。临床医生应该根据疾病的严重程度、特征、疗效和成本考虑,为间歇性外斜视患者量身定制个性化的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-surgical therapy for intermittent exotropia: a systematic review and network analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of various non-surgical treatments for intermittent exotropia(IXT).

Methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to June 2024. Following independent screening, data extraction, and bias assessment by two researchers, network meta-analysis was conducted using R 4.2.2 software.

Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 1411 patients were included. Treatment options included overminus lenses (OML), conventional prisms(base-in prism) (CP), part time occlusion (PTO), and binocular vision training (BVT). OML demonstrated superior efficacy in improving distance and near control(1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22 ∼ 1.8); 0.67, 95% CI :0.027 ∼ 1.2), as well as reducing near exodeviation compared to observation(4.5, 95% CI, 1.9 ∼ 6.9), but failed to reduce distance angle of deviation(3.2, 95%CI, -1.1 ∼ 6.4). No significant effect in improving control and reducing exodeviation angle at both distance and near was observed in PTO, BVT, and CP. Probability ranking indicated that the top-ranking three non-surgical interventions were OML, BVT and PTO for improving distance control and reducing near exodeviation; the top three non-surgical interventions for reducing distance exodevition were OML, PTO and BVT; the best non-surgical intervention for improving near control was OML, BVT、 PTO and CP have similar effects. The four non-surgical treatments had no significant impact on near stereoacuity.

Conclusion: Overall, OML ranks first among the four conservative treatment methods. These four commonly used non-surgical interventions did not significantly impact near stereoacuity. Clinicians should tailor personalized treatment strategies for patients with intermittent exotropia based on disease severity, characteristics, efficacy, and cost considerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparing structural and vascular parameters between advanced pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma using optical coherence tomography angiography. Phaeoisaria sp. fungal keratitis resembling corneal rust residue: a case report. Quantitative evaluation of the wide-field fundus photographs in eyes with severe stage 3 and stage 4A retinopathy of prematurity. Incidence of ophthalmic manifestations in congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV). Increased aqueous humor levels of endothelin-1 in patients with open angle glaucoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1